28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60<br />

ChApter 1<br />

cared about their life with the other Yugoslav peoples—with whom<br />

they had a common history—the argument ran, they must divest<br />

themselves of each other in order to “think of their survival.” The<br />

discussion of amendments to the 1974 Constitution raised the question<br />

of “historical accountability to the Serb people” and threw into<br />

focus matters of the utmost importance (e.g., the question of Serbia’s<br />

“identity and integrity, that is, the question of its unification under<br />

international law”). 43 The 1974 Constitution was clearly a pretext to<br />

raise the Serbian national issue on what Professor Radoslav Stojanović<br />

termed “the objective fact that nations tend towards their unity.”<br />

“Serb nationalism hoisted its banner when Serbia was confined<br />

within the Pashalik of Belgrade, so another reduction of Serbia to a<br />

Belgrade pashalik will rekindle Serb nationalism.” 44<br />

The last decade of Tito’s rule was characterized by the domination<br />

of Yugoslavia by the ypa, which exercised its constitutional role<br />

as the guarantor of Yugoslavia’s integrity—with the 1974 Constitution,<br />

the ypa was invested with a capacity to impose law and order if<br />

necessary. Yet the ypa, which was assigned a major role in the defense<br />

of the country under the system of Territorial Defense (adopted in<br />

response to the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia), was opposed to<br />

the confederation of Yugoslavia and the creation of republic-states as<br />

outlined in the 1974 Constitution. The attitude of the ypa toward the<br />

1974 Constitution became similar to attitudes prevailing in Serbia.<br />

Tito had consented to the 1974 Constitution because he believed<br />

that he still had the main say in any arbitration; he believed his most<br />

effective tool was the ypa, which could be used to quash dissident<br />

opinion or behavior. In addition, Tito’s insistence that the lcy was<br />

a cohesive factor in Yugoslavia prevented the country from becoming<br />

a true federation in spite of the normative changes made to that<br />

effect.<br />

43 Pravni anali (Legal records), Beograd, 1971, No . 3, p . 232 .<br />

44 Ibid . p . 266 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!