28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

they considered him “the incarnation of Serbdom, a man bidden by<br />

history to personalize politically this age and state. … [T]hey respect<br />

him because they believe him to be the state symbol of Serbia.” 27<br />

Croatian politician Branko Horvat described the Brioni Plenum’s<br />

dismissal of Ranković and ensuing crackdown on the State Security<br />

Service as the “formal beginning of our third revolution,” the<br />

first, in his opinion, having taken place in 1941 and the second in 1948<br />

(the break with the Soviet Union). Parallel with this development<br />

was a gradual shift toward the concept of a republican statehood in<br />

response to the centralist and unitarian tendencies. The Brioni Plenum<br />

made it possible to embark on processes that galvanized the<br />

whole of Yugoslavia, including Serbia, and sharpened the clash<br />

between the lcy’s conservative and reformist wings. The articulation<br />

of demands to democratize the country coincided with increasing<br />

manifestations of the problem of intercommunal relations in the<br />

wider Yugoslav context, for the national “emancipation” (the process<br />

of national profiling of Macedonians, Montenegrins, Bosnians,<br />

Croats, and Slovenes) had raised the question of the character of<br />

Yugoslavia in all respects, especially economic.<br />

The political demise of Ranković created a political climate that<br />

encouraged national movements throughout the country, including<br />

an awakening of the ethnic Albanian population. Democratic forces<br />

in Serbia capitalized on the Brioni Plenum to push through major<br />

decisions concerning the political system, especially the role and<br />

character of the State Security Service, and to transform the lcy.<br />

Even the Central Committee of the League of Communists of Serbia<br />

sharply criticized the work of the State Security Service in Kosovo<br />

as a “drastic example of chauvinistic practice”—that is, of favoring<br />

Serbs at the expense of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo.<br />

However, Ranković’s dismissal and the reaction in Serbia to the<br />

move were the first signs of a clash between two different concepts in<br />

27 Dobrica Ćosić, Piščevi zapisi 1951–1968 (A writer’s notes), (Belgrade: Filip Višnjić, 2000) p 263 .<br />

47<br />

ChApter 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!