28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38<br />

ChApter 1<br />

that Serbs and Croats could not live together, that a break was inevitable,<br />

and that Serbia should concentrate on building Greater<br />

Serbia. 9<br />

Serbia believed that it deserved a vanguard role in the 1934 Balkan<br />

Entente, the collective defense arrangement designed to discourage<br />

the territorial claims of various European countries. With the<br />

assassination of King Aleksandar that October, the Yugoslav dictatorship<br />

ended and the problem of restructuring the state surged to<br />

the forefront, threatening the very existence of Yugoslavia. The Serbian<br />

claims on Yugoslavia were neither economically nor culturally<br />

founded. Arising from a predominantly agrarian economy, Serbia’s<br />

political culture could not assimilate the much more developed western<br />

parts of the country. The state restructuring problem revolved<br />

around the issue of Croatian sovereignty, which had become acute.<br />

The 1939 Cvetković-Maček agreement between Yugoslav prime minister<br />

Dragiša Cvetković and Croat politician Vladko Maček establishing<br />

the Banovina (province) of Croatia was a concession to growing<br />

Croat discontent, an effort to mollify the pro-autonomy movement<br />

in Croatia lest it grow into a separatist movement. The agreement<br />

immediately agitated the Serbs, who countered with demands that a<br />

Serbian banovina be set up on ethnic Serbian territories.<br />

At the forefront of the criticism of the Croatian banovina was<br />

the Serbian Cultural Club, which viewed the agreement as an<br />

anti-Serbian deal that “left the Serbs in the Banovina of Croatia<br />

in such a frame of mind that they no longer feel at home there.” 10<br />

The club postulated that because “the Serbs were the chief architects<br />

of Yugoslavia,” the state “needs them more than ever before.”<br />

Such statements exemplified the attitude of Serbs toward the state:<br />

9 In 1927, the brochure “Amputation” was circulated by Serbian nationalists,<br />

drawing a line of demarcation between Greater Serbia and Croatia running from<br />

Virovitica to the Adriatic sea by way of Grbišno Polje, Sisak, Karlovac and the River<br />

Kupa, and leaving the Croats a stretch of the littoral from Bakar to Rijeka .<br />

10 Srpski glas, No . 16, February 29, 1940 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!