28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

304<br />

ChApter 4<br />

killed by the same hand. Let them sleep their eternal sleep. Their<br />

graves are a symbol of a major historical tragedy and a lasting warning<br />

to our offspring. They are sacrifices for the homeland, faith and<br />

freedom. Their sacrifices constitute the foundation of Republika<br />

Srpska.” 518<br />

The Serbian elite’s efforts to distance the Serbian state from<br />

responsibility for war crimes received help from an unexpected<br />

quarter, the International Court of Justice (icj) in The Hague. On<br />

February 26, 2007, the icj declared that there was not sufficient evidence<br />

to prove that the Serbian state was responsible for genocide<br />

during the Bosnian war. 519 The icj found that although Serbia had<br />

failed to fulfill its obligation to stop, and punish the perpetrators of,<br />

the July 1995 genocide in Srebrenica, there was not enough evidence<br />

that Serbia had assisted or financed the acts of genocide in Bosnia<br />

and Herzegovina during the conflicts of the 1990s. Serbia was not<br />

found guilty of responsibility for genocide when the genocide took<br />

place; there was no clear evidence that the government in Belgrade<br />

was aware that such a crime was being committed.<br />

The icj, however, refused the Bosnian applicants’ request to<br />

order Serbia to disclose an edited version of the minutes of the Serbian<br />

Supreme Defense Council, the body in charge of the Yugoslav<br />

army. Judges in the Milošević case had those minutes at their disposal<br />

when they found that there was enough evidence to convict<br />

Milošević on genocide charges in Bosnia—not only in Srebrenica in<br />

1995, but in relation to events that had began in 1992.<br />

The icj also said that because it had not been shown that the<br />

genocide would have been averted if the fry had tried to prevent it,<br />

“financial compensation for the failure to prevent the genocide at<br />

Srebrenica is not the appropriate form of reparation.” However, the<br />

518 Vecernje novosti, June 30, 2005 .<br />

519 See, for instance, the report by Jeremy Bransten, “ICJ Bosnia Ruling Sets Important<br />

Precedents,” February 27, 2007, Radio France Europe/Radio Liberty, reproduced at<br />

http://www .globalpolicy .org/component/content/article/163-general/28681 .html .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!