28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

IntroduCtIon<br />

researched. Post-communist societies have been, as a rule, saddled<br />

with weak or ruined economies, dysfunctional institutions, corruption,<br />

crime, and demoralized societies. The belief that those countries<br />

could morph overnight into democracies proved fallacious.<br />

Nationalism has been present in most the post-communist world<br />

as a substitute for the failed ideology. Most post-communist societies<br />

have been multiethnic and have had no mechanisms to deal with<br />

tensions and conflicts generated by the newly arisen nationalism.<br />

However, Serbian radical nationalism, which led to the break-up of<br />

the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, was unique in the sense<br />

that the Serbian political leadership had neither the political will<br />

nor the skill to respect basic international standards in resolving the<br />

Yugoslav crisis.<br />

During the past two centuries, the development of the Serbian<br />

nation and the Serbian state has been marked by a conflict between<br />

patriarchy and modernity that slowed the creation of a “complete<br />

state” 1 and made the cultural integration of Serbs into the international<br />

community more difficult. That clash resurfaced in the final<br />

quarter of the past century when, seeing the possibility of the emergence<br />

of a genuinely confederal and multiethnic Yugoslav state<br />

as a loss of identity, many Serbs embraced the revived concept of<br />

“Greater Serbia,” a concept that drew its strength from the patriarchal,<br />

collectivist model of state and society, from an ethnic-religious<br />

understanding of a nation, and from an emotional reliance on the<br />

glory of the medieval Serbian empire.<br />

The collapse of Yugoslavia was the outcome of a long process<br />

and its nature was determined by the combined effects of international<br />

and domestic developments. My personal approach to those<br />

developments reflects the insight I acquired, as a senior diplomat,<br />

1 That term was coined by Zoran Đinđić . Emblematic of that idea is his study Yugoslavia<br />

as an Unfinished State (Novi Sad: Književna zadruga Novog Sada, 1988); and Nenad<br />

Dimitrijevic’s essay “Serbia as an Unfinished State,” Reč (Belgrade) 69, no . 15 (2003) .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!