28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

finance the war and to enrich those close to the regime, reflects the<br />

fact that nationalism is not a doctrine of human rights, but rather<br />

a doctrine which repudiates human rights, even of the members<br />

of one’s own nation. This also means that encounters with other<br />

nations are seen as zero-sum games, in which a gain for one side<br />

is seen as necessarily coming at the expense of the other side. This<br />

way of thinking about nationalism allows one to speak of degrees<br />

of nationalism: in practice, the more radical nationalists are those<br />

who are the most consistent in acting out the principles enumerated<br />

above. Viewed in these terms, it is clear that nationalism is anti-individualist,<br />

anti-liberal, and inclined to xenophobia. But there is<br />

more: because there is a correlation between nationalism and violence<br />

toward outsiders and because, at a certain level, such violence<br />

affects the entire society, politically active nationalists may be said to<br />

do injury to their own nation, as well as to other nations.<br />

At this point in time, the alternative to nationalism should be<br />

obvious. The example set by France and Germany after 1945, in setting<br />

aside old resentments, quarrels, and distrust, and in building a<br />

new relationship based on mutual respect, trust, and cooperation,<br />

provides a model for other nations. Moreover, the European Union<br />

itself may be understood as a community of states working for the<br />

common good, and rejecting zero-sum thinking. The challenge for<br />

Serbia today is to escape the vicious cycle of denial, self-righteousness,<br />

self-pitying, and – in the case of more extreme nationalists<br />

such as Bosnian Serb President Milorad Dodik – refusal to accept<br />

documented evidence about past events. For Dodik and those Serbs<br />

who prefer myth to documentation, it is easy to claim that 700,000<br />

Serbs died at Jasenovac; the truth, however – as historical researcher<br />

Nataša Mataušić has shown – is that just over 80,000 persons were<br />

killed at Jasenovac and that, among these, just over 45,000 were Serbs.<br />

The insistence on a much higher figure, especially when demographic<br />

research has shown that the total number of Yugoslav dead<br />

13<br />

Foreword

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!