4.2.3 Imposing Pressure: BarostatsKeeping the pressure constant is a desirable feature for many applications of <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong>. The concept of barostats <strong>and</strong> thus constant–pressure <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong>was introduced in the framework of extended system <strong>dynamics</strong> by Hans Andersen14 , see e.g. Refs. 12,270,585,217 for introductions. This method was devised toallow for isotropic fluctuations in the volume of the supercell. A powerful extensionconsists in also allowing for changes of the shape of the supercell to occur as a resultof applying external pressure 459,460,461,678 , including the possibility of non–isotropicexternal stress 460 ; the additional fictitious degrees of freedom in the Parrinello–Rahman approach 459,460,461 are the lattice vectors of the supercell, whereas thestrain tensor is the dynamical variable in the Wentzcovitch approach 678 . Thesevariable–cell approaches make it possible to study dynamically structural phasetransitions in solids at finite temperatures. With the birth of ab <strong>initio</strong> <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> both approaches were combined starting out with isotropic volumefluctuations 94 à la Andersen 14 <strong>and</strong> followed by Born–Oppenheimer 681,682 <strong>and</strong>Car–Parrinello 201,202,55,56 variable–cell techniques.The basic idea to allow for changes in the cell shape consists in constructingan extended Lagrangian where the primitive Bravais lattice vectors a 1 , a 2 <strong>and</strong> a 3of the simulation cell are additional dynamical variables similar to the thermostatdegree of freedom ξ, see Eq. (268). Using the 3 × 3 matrix h = [a 1 ,a 2 ,a 3 ] (whichfully defines the cell with volume Ω) the real–space position R I of a particle in thisoriginal cell can be expressed asR I = hS I (274)where S I is a scaled coordinate with components S I,u ∈ [0, 1] that defines theposition of the Ith particle in a unit cube (i.e. Ω unit = 1) which is the scaledcell 459,460 , see Sect. 3.1 for some def<strong>initio</strong>ns. The resulting metric tensor G = h t hconverts distances measured in scaled coordinates to distances as given by theoriginal coordinates according to Eq. (106) <strong>and</strong> periodic boundary conditions areapplied using Eq. (107).In the case of ab <strong>initio</strong> <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> the orbitals have to be expressedsuitably in the scaled coordinates s = h −1 r. The normalized original orbitals φ i (r)as defined in the unscaled cell h are transformed according tosatisfying∫Ωφ i (r) = 1 √Ωφ i (s) (275)∫dr φ ⋆ i (r)φ i (r) =Ω unitso that the resulting charge density is given byds φ ⋆ i (s)φ i (s) (276)n(r) = 1 n (s) . (277)Ωin the scaled cell, i.e. the unit cube. Importantly, the scaled fields φ i (s) <strong>and</strong> thustheir charge density n(s) do not depend on the dynamical variables associated tothe cell degrees of freedom <strong>and</strong> thus can be varied independently from the cell; the97
original unscaled fields φ i (r) do depend on the cell variables h via the normalizationby the cell volume Ω = det h as evidenced by Eq. (275).After these preliminaries a variable–cell extended Lagrangian for ab <strong>initio</strong> <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> can be postulated 202,201,55L = ∑ 〈 µ ˙φi (s) ∣ ˙φ〉i (s) − E KS [{φ i }, {hS I }]i+ ∑ ij+ ∑ IΛ ij (〈φ i (s) |φ j (s)〉 − δ ij )12 M I(Ṡt I GṠI)+ 1 2 W Tr ḣt ḣ − p Ω , (278)with additional nine dynamical degrees of freedom that are associated to the latticevectors of the supercell h. This constant–pressure Lagrangian reduces to theconstant–volume Car–Parrinello Lagrangian, see e.g. Eq. (41) or Eq. (58), in thelimit ḣ → 0 of a rigid cell (apart from a constant term p Ω). Here, p defines theexternally applied hydrostatic pressure, W defines the fictitious mass or inertia parameterthat controls the time–scale of the motion of the cell h <strong>and</strong> the interactionenergy E KS is of the form that is defined in Eq. (75). In particular, this Lagrangianallows for symmetry–breaking fluctuations – which might be necessary to drivea solid–state phase transformation – to take place spontaneously. The resultingequations of motion readM I ¨S I,u = −3∑v=1µ¨φ i (s) = − δEKSδφ ⋆ i (s) + ∑ jWḧuv = Ω3∑s=1∂E KS∂R I,v( ht ) −1vu − M I3∑3∑v=1 s=1G −1uv ˙ G vs Ṡ I,s (279)Λ ij φ j (s) (280)(Πtotus − p δ us) (ht ) −1sv, (281)where the total internal stress tensorΠ totus = 1 ∑ )M I(ṠtΩI GṠI + Π us (282)usIis the sum of the thermal contribution due to nuclear motion at finite temperature<strong>and</strong> the electronic stress tensor 440,441 Π which is defined in Eq. (189) <strong>and</strong> thefollowing equations, see Sect. 3.4.Similar to the thermostat case discussed in the previous section one can recognizea sort of frictional feedback mechanism. The average internal pressure〈(1/3) Tr Π tot 〉 equals the externally applied pressure p as a result of maintainingdynamically a balance between p δ <strong>and</strong> the instantaneous internal stress Π totby virtue of the friction coefficient ∝ G ˙ in Eq. (279). Ergodic trajectories obtainedfrom solving the associated ab <strong>initio</strong> equations of motion Eq. (279)–(281) lead toa sampling according to the isobaric–isoenthalpic or NpH ensemble. However, thegenerated <strong>dynamics</strong> is fictitious similar to the constant–temperature case discussed98
- Page 1 and 2:
John von Neumann Institute for Comp
- Page 4:
2500Number200015001000CP PRL 1985AI
- Page 7 and 8:
The goal of this section is to deri
- Page 9:
¡the Newtonian equation of motion
- Page 13 and 14:
Ehrenfest molecular dynamics is cer
- Page 15 and 16:
the Car-Parrinello approach 108 , s
- Page 17:
According to the Car-Parrinello equ
- Page 20 and 21:
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the x-c
- Page 22 and 23:
Up to this point the entire discuss
- Page 24 and 25:
parameters are those used to repres
- Page 26 and 27:
in terms of a linear combination of
- Page 28 and 29:
structure calculations, see e.g. Re
- Page 30 and 31:
“unbound electrons” dissolved i
- Page 32 and 33:
Table 1. Timings in cpu seconds and
- Page 34 and 35:
stressed that the energy conservati
- Page 36 and 37:
see e.g. the discussion following E
- Page 38 and 39:
from a set of one-particle spin orb
- Page 40 and 41:
is used, which represents exactly a
- Page 42 and 43:
2.8.3 Generalized Plane WavesAn ext
- Page 44 and 45:
disposable parameters that can be o
- Page 46 and 47:
The index i runs over all states an
- Page 48 and 49: f(G) are related by three-dimension
- Page 50 and 51: where j l are spherical Bessel func
- Page 52 and 53: andE self = ∑ I1√2πZ 2 IR c I.
- Page 54 and 55: ¢££¤¤¢¢¢n tot (G)inv FTn to
- Page 56 and 57: correlation energyΩ ∑E xc = ε x
- Page 58 and 59: 3.4 Total Energy, Gradients, and St
- Page 60 and 61: 3.4.3 Gradient for Nuclear Position
- Page 62 and 63: The local part of the pseudopotenti
- Page 64 and 65: ¢¢¢¢¢i = 1 . . .N b¢c i (G)¢
- Page 66 and 67: ¢¢¢¢¢c i (G)123g, E self∆V I
- Page 68 and 69: where G c is a free parameter that
- Page 70 and 71: and a matrix form of the Gram-Schmi
- Page 72 and 73: The two sets of equations are coupl
- Page 74 and 75: introducing different masses for di
- Page 76 and 77: The Lagrange multiplier have to be
- Page 78 and 79: Table 3. Relative size of character
- Page 80 and 81: of the G vectors, and only real ope
- Page 82 and 83: CALL SGEMM(’T’,’N’,M,N b ,2
- Page 84 and 85: ing standard communication librarie
- Page 86 and 87: over processors. All processors sho
- Page 88 and 89: ab = 2 * sdot(2 * N p D ,A(1),1,B(1
- Page 90 and 91: ENDCALL ParallelFFT3D("INV",scr1,sc
- Page 92 and 93: are the improved load-balancing for
- Page 94 and 95: situations where• it is necessary
- Page 96 and 97: espectively), but completely analog
- Page 100 and 101: in the previous section. The isobar
- Page 102 and 103: 4.3.2 Many Excited States: Free Ene
- Page 104 and 105: down the generalization of the Helm
- Page 106 and 107: free energy functional discussed in
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 16. Four patterns of spin de
- Page 110 and 111: and electrons r = {r i } can be wri
- Page 112 and 113: The effective classical partition f
- Page 114 and 115: up e.g. in Refs. 132,37,596,597,428
- Page 116 and 117: The eigenvalues of A when multiplie
- Page 118 and 119: frequency of the electronic degrees
- Page 120 and 121: 5.2 Solids, Polymers, and Materials
- Page 122 and 123: the penetration of the oxidation la
- Page 124 and 125: in terms of their electronic struct
- Page 126 and 127: culations on very accurate global p
- Page 128 and 129: AcknowledgmentsOur knowledge on ab
- Page 130 and 131: 57. M. Bernasconi, G. L. Chiarotti,
- Page 132 and 133: Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)
- Page 134 and 135: 175. E. Ermakova, J. Solca, H. Hube
- Page 136 and 137: 244. H. Goldstein, Klassische Mecha
- Page 138 and 139: 313. T. Ikeda, M. Sprik, K. Terakur
- Page 140 and 141: 384. N. A. Marks, D. R. McKenzie, B
- Page 142 and 143: 442. S. Nosé and M. L. Klein, Mol.
- Page 144 and 145: 502. L. M. Ramaniah, M. Bernasconi,
- Page 146 and 147: 562. F. Shimojo, K. Hoshino, and Y.
- Page 148 and 149:
620. A. Tongraar, K. R. Liedl, and
- Page 150:
682. R. M. Wentzcovitch, Phys. Rev.