disposable parameters that can be optimized for a particular calculation. Note thatthe discretization points in continuous space can also be considered to constitute asort of “finite basis set” – despite different statements in the literature – <strong>and</strong> thatthe “infinite basis set limit” is reached as h → 0 for N fixed. A variation on thetheme are Mehrstellen schemes where the discretization of the entire differentialequation <strong>and</strong> not only of the derivative operator is optimized 89 .The first real–space approach devised for ab <strong>initio</strong> <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> was basedon the lowest–order finite–difference approximation in conjunction with a equally–spaced cubic mesh in real space 109 . A variety of other implementations of moresophisticated real–space methods followed <strong>and</strong> include e.g. non–uniform meshes,multigrid acceleration, different discretization techniques, <strong>and</strong> finite–element methods686,61,39,130,131,632,633,431,634 . Among the chief advantages of the real–spacemethods is that linear scaling approaches 453,243 can be implemented in a naturalway <strong>and</strong> that the multiple–length scale problem can be coped with by adapting thegrid. However, the extension to such non–uniform meshes induces the (in)famousPulay forces (see Sect. 2.5) if the mesh moves as the nuclei move.3 Basic Techniques: <strong>Implementation</strong> within the CPMD Code3.1 Introduction <strong>and</strong> Basic Def<strong>initio</strong>nsThis section discusses the implementation of the plane wave–pseudopotential <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> method within the CPMD computer code 142 . It concentrates on thebasics leaving advanced methods to later chapters. In addition all formulas are forthe non-spin polarized case. This allows to show the essential features of a planewave code as well as the reasons for its high performance in detail. The implementationof other versions of the presented algorithms <strong>and</strong> of the more advancedtechniques in Sect. 4 is in most cases very similar.There are many reviews on the pseudopotential plane wave method alone or inconnection with the Car–Parrinello algorithm. Older articles 312,157,487,591 as wellas the book by Singh 578 concentrate on the electronic structure part. Other reviews513,472,223,224 present the plane wave method in connection with the <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> technique.3.1.1 Unit Cell <strong>and</strong> Plane Wave BasisThe unit cell of a periodically repeated system is defined by the Bravais latticevectors a 1 , a 2 , <strong>and</strong> a 3 . The Bravais vectors can be combined into a three by threematrix h = [a 1 ,a 2 ,a 3 ] 459 . The volume Ω of the cell is calculated as the determinantof hΩ = deth . (104)Further, scaled coordinates s are introduced that are related to r via hr = hs . (105)43
Distances in scaled coordinates are related to distances in real coordinates by themetric tensor G = h t h(r i − r j ) 2 = (s i − s j ) t G(s i − s j ) . (106)Periodic boundary conditions can be enforced by usingr pbc = r − h [ h −1 r ] NINT , (107)where [· · ·] NINT denotes the nearest integer value. The coordinates r pbc will bealways within the box centered around the origin of the coordinate system. Reciprocallattice vectors b i are defined as<strong>and</strong> can also be arranged to a three by three matrixb i · a j = 2π δ ij (108)[b 1 ,b 2 ,b 3 ] = 2π(h t ) −1 . (109)Plane waves build a complete <strong>and</strong> orthonormal basis with the above periodicity(see also the section on plane waves in Sect. 2.8)with the reciprocal space vectorsf PWG (r) = 1 √Ωexp[iG · r] = 1 √Ωexp[2π ig · s] , (110)G = 2π(h t ) −1 g , (111)where g = [i, j, k] is a triple of integer values. A periodic function can be exp<strong>and</strong>edin this basisψ(r) = ψ(r + L) = √ 1 ∑ψ(G) exp[iG · r] , (112)Ωwhere ψ(r) <strong>and</strong> ψ(G) are related by a three-dimensional Fourier transform. Thedirect lattice vectors L connect equivalent points in different cells.3.1.2 Plane Wave ExpansionsThe Kohn–Sham potential (see Eq. (82)) of a periodic system exhibits the sameperiodicity as the direct latticeGV KS (r) = V KS (r + L) , (113)<strong>and</strong> the Kohn–Sham orbitals can be written in Bloch form (see e.g. Ref. 27 )Ψ(r) = Ψ i (r,k) = exp[ik · r] u i (r,k) , (114)where k is a vector in the first Brillouin zone. The functions u i (r,k) have theperiodicity of the direct latticeu i (r,k) = u i (r + L,k) . (115)44
- Page 1 and 2: John von Neumann Institute for Comp
- Page 4: 2500Number200015001000CP PRL 1985AI
- Page 7 and 8: The goal of this section is to deri
- Page 9: ¡the Newtonian equation of motion
- Page 13 and 14: Ehrenfest molecular dynamics is cer
- Page 15 and 16: the Car-Parrinello approach 108 , s
- Page 17: According to the Car-Parrinello equ
- Page 20 and 21: Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the x-c
- Page 22 and 23: Up to this point the entire discuss
- Page 24 and 25: parameters are those used to repres
- Page 26 and 27: in terms of a linear combination of
- Page 28 and 29: structure calculations, see e.g. Re
- Page 30 and 31: “unbound electrons” dissolved i
- Page 32 and 33: Table 1. Timings in cpu seconds and
- Page 34 and 35: stressed that the energy conservati
- Page 36 and 37: see e.g. the discussion following E
- Page 38 and 39: from a set of one-particle spin orb
- Page 40 and 41: is used, which represents exactly a
- Page 42 and 43: 2.8.3 Generalized Plane WavesAn ext
- Page 46 and 47: The index i runs over all states an
- Page 48 and 49: f(G) are related by three-dimension
- Page 50 and 51: where j l are spherical Bessel func
- Page 52 and 53: andE self = ∑ I1√2πZ 2 IR c I.
- Page 54 and 55: ¢££¤¤¢¢¢n tot (G)inv FTn to
- Page 56 and 57: correlation energyΩ ∑E xc = ε x
- Page 58 and 59: 3.4 Total Energy, Gradients, and St
- Page 60 and 61: 3.4.3 Gradient for Nuclear Position
- Page 62 and 63: The local part of the pseudopotenti
- Page 64 and 65: ¢¢¢¢¢i = 1 . . .N b¢c i (G)¢
- Page 66 and 67: ¢¢¢¢¢c i (G)123g, E self∆V I
- Page 68 and 69: where G c is a free parameter that
- Page 70 and 71: and a matrix form of the Gram-Schmi
- Page 72 and 73: The two sets of equations are coupl
- Page 74 and 75: introducing different masses for di
- Page 76 and 77: The Lagrange multiplier have to be
- Page 78 and 79: Table 3. Relative size of character
- Page 80 and 81: of the G vectors, and only real ope
- Page 82 and 83: CALL SGEMM(’T’,’N’,M,N b ,2
- Page 84 and 85: ing standard communication librarie
- Page 86 and 87: over processors. All processors sho
- Page 88 and 89: ab = 2 * sdot(2 * N p D ,A(1),1,B(1
- Page 90 and 91: ENDCALL ParallelFFT3D("INV",scr1,sc
- Page 92 and 93: are the improved load-balancing for
- Page 94 and 95:
situations where• it is necessary
- Page 96 and 97:
espectively), but completely analog
- Page 98 and 99:
4.2.3 Imposing Pressure: BarostatsK
- Page 100 and 101:
in the previous section. The isobar
- Page 102 and 103:
4.3.2 Many Excited States: Free Ene
- Page 104 and 105:
down the generalization of the Helm
- Page 106 and 107:
free energy functional discussed in
- Page 108 and 109:
Figure 16. Four patterns of spin de
- Page 110 and 111:
and electrons r = {r i } can be wri
- Page 112 and 113:
The effective classical partition f
- Page 114 and 115:
up e.g. in Refs. 132,37,596,597,428
- Page 116 and 117:
The eigenvalues of A when multiplie
- Page 118 and 119:
frequency of the electronic degrees
- Page 120 and 121:
5.2 Solids, Polymers, and Materials
- Page 122 and 123:
the penetration of the oxidation la
- Page 124 and 125:
in terms of their electronic struct
- Page 126 and 127:
culations on very accurate global p
- Page 128 and 129:
AcknowledgmentsOur knowledge on ab
- Page 130 and 131:
57. M. Bernasconi, G. L. Chiarotti,
- Page 132 and 133:
Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)
- Page 134 and 135:
175. E. Ermakova, J. Solca, H. Hube
- Page 136 and 137:
244. H. Goldstein, Klassische Mecha
- Page 138 and 139:
313. T. Ikeda, M. Sprik, K. Terakur
- Page 140 and 141:
384. N. A. Marks, D. R. McKenzie, B
- Page 142 and 143:
442. S. Nosé and M. L. Klein, Mol.
- Page 144 and 145:
502. L. M. Ramaniah, M. Bernasconi,
- Page 146 and 147:
562. F. Shimojo, K. Hoshino, and Y.
- Page 148 and 149:
620. A. Tongraar, K. R. Liedl, and
- Page 150:
682. R. M. Wentzcovitch, Phys. Rev.