12.07.2015 Views

Ab initio molecular dynamics: Theory and Implementation

Ab initio molecular dynamics: Theory and Implementation

Ab initio molecular dynamics: Theory and Implementation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3. Various energies Eqs. (48)–(51) for a model system propagatedvia Car–Parrinello<strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> for at short (up to 300 fs), intermediate, <strong>and</strong> long times (up to 6.3 ps); for furtherdetails see text. Adapted from Ref. 467 .for the stability of the Car–Parrinello <strong>dynamics</strong>, vide infra. But already the visiblevariations are three orders of magnitude smaller than the physically meaningful oscillationsof V e . As a result, E phys defined as E cons − T e or equivalently as the sumof the nuclear kinetic energy <strong>and</strong> the electronic total energy (which serves as thepotential energy for the nuclei) is essentially constant on the relevant energy <strong>and</strong>time scales. Thus, it behaves approximately like the strictly conserved total energyin classical <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> (with only nuclei as dynamical degrees of freedom)or in Born–Oppenheimer <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> (with fully optimized electronic degreesof freedom) <strong>and</strong> is therefore often denoted as the “physical total energy”.This implies that the resulting physically significant <strong>dynamics</strong> of the nuclei yieldsan excellent approximation to microcanonical <strong>dynamics</strong> (<strong>and</strong> assuming ergodicityto the microcanonical ensemble). Note that a different explanation was advocatedin Ref. 470 (see also Ref. 472 , in particular Sect. VIII.B <strong>and</strong> C), which was howeverrevised in Ref. 110 . A discussion similar in spirit to the one outlined here 467 isprovided in Ref. 513 , see in particular Sect. 3.2 <strong>and</strong> 3.3.Given the adiabatic separation <strong>and</strong> the stability of the propagation, the centralquestion remains if the forces acting on the nuclei are actually the “correct” onesin Car–Parrinello <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong>. As a reference serve the forces obtainedfrom full self–consistent minimizations of the electronic energy min {ψi}〈Ψ 0 |H e |Ψ 0 〉at each time step, i.e. Born–Oppenheimer <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> with extremely wellconverged wavefunctions. This is indeed the case as demonstrated in Fig. 4(a):the physically meaningful <strong>dynamics</strong> of the x–component of the force acting on onesilicon atom in the model system obtained from stable Car–Parrinello fictitious<strong>dynamics</strong> propagation of the electrons <strong>and</strong> from iterative minimizations of the electronicenergy are extremely close.Better resolution of one oscillation period in (b) reveals that the gross deviationsare also oscillatory but that they are four orders of magnitudes smaller than18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!