The eigenvalues of A when multiplied by P are precisely the normal mode frequencies{λ} (s) . Since the transformation is unitary, its Jacobian is unity. Finally, it isconvenient to define a set of normal mode massesM (s)I= λ (s) M I (326)that vary along the imaginary time axis s = 1, . . ., P, where λ (1) = 0 for thecentroid mode u (1)I .Based on these transformations the Lagrangian corresponding to the ab <strong>initio</strong>path integral expressed in normal modes is obtained 644L AIPI = 1 PP∑s=1{∑iΛ (s)ij+ ∑ ij{P∑ ∑ N+s=1I=1µ(〈〈 ˙φ(s) iφ (s)i∣∣∣φ (s)j1(2 M ′(s)I〉 [ ( )} ] (s)(s) ˙φ i − E {φ i } (s) ,{R I u (1)I , . . .,u(P) I〉− δ ij) }) 2 ∑N˙u (s) 1I −I=12 M(s) IωP2(u (s)I) 2}, (327)where the masses M ′(s)Iwill be defined later, see Eq. (338). As indicated, theelectronic energy E (s) is always evaluated in practice in terms of the “primitive”path variables {R I } (s) in Cartesian space. The necessary transformation to switchforth <strong>and</strong> back between “primitive” <strong>and</strong> normal mode variables is easily performedas given by the relations Eq. (325).The chief advantage of the normal mode representation Eq. (325) for the presentpurpose is that the lowest–order normal mode u (1)Iu (1)I= R c I = 1 P∑R (s′ )I(328)Pturns out to be identical to the centroid R c Iof the path that represents the Ithnucleus. The centroid force can also be obtained from the matrix U accordingto 644∂E∂u (1)I= 1 PP∑s ′ =1s ′ =1∂E (s′ )∂R (s′ )Isince U 1s = U † s1 = 1/√ P <strong>and</strong> the remaining normal mode forces are given by∂E∂u (s)I= 1 √P P ∑s ′ =1∂E (s′ )U ss ′∂R (s′ )I(329)for s = 2, . . ., P (330)in terms of the “primitive” forces −∂E (s) /∂R (s)I. Here, E on the left–h<strong>and</strong>–sidewith no superscript (s) refers to the average electronic energy E = (1/P) ∑ Ps=1 E(s)from which the forces have to be derived. Thus, the force Eq. (329) acting on eachcentroid variable u (1)I, I = 1, . . .N, is exactly the force averaged over imaginarytime s = 1, . . ., P, i.e. the centroid force on the Ith nucleus as already given in115
Eq. (2.21) of Ref. 644 . This is the desired relation which allows in centroid <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> the centroid forces to be simply obtained as the average force which actson the lowest-order normal mode Eq. (328). The non–centroid normal modes u (s)I ,s = 2, 3, . . ., P of the paths establish the effective potential in which the centroidmoves.At this stage the equations of motion for adiabatic ab <strong>initio</strong> centroid <strong>molecular</strong><strong>dynamics</strong> 411 can be obtained from the Euler–Lagrange equations. These equationsof motion readM ′(1)Iü (1)I= − 1 PM ′(s)Iü (s)I,α = −µ¨φ (s)iP∑ ∂E [ {φ i } (s) , {R I } (s)]s=1∂∂u (s)I,α1PP∑s ′ =1−M (s)IωPu 2 (s)∂R (s)I[ (E {φ i } (s′) ,{R II,α − M ′(s)I˙ξ (s)I,α,1 ˙u(s) I,α= − δE [ {φ i } (s) , {R I } (s)]+ ∑ jδφ ⋆(s)iu (1)I)} ] (s, . . .,u (P)′ )I(331), s = 2, . . ., P (332)Λ (s)ij φ(s) j− µ ˙η (s)1˙φ (s)i, s = 1, . . ., P (333)where u (s)I,αdenotes the Cartesian components of a given normal mode vectoru (s)I= (u (s)I,1 , u(s) I,2 , u(s) I,3). In the present scheme, independent Nosé–Hoover chainthermostats 388 of length K are coupled to all non–centroid mode degrees of freedoms = 2, . . ., P[Q n¨ξ(s) I,α,1 =M ′(s)I( ] 2˙uI,α) (s) − kB T[ ( 2Q n¨ξ(s) I,α,k = Q n ˙I,α,k−1) ξ(s) − kB T]− Q n ˙ ξ(s)− Q n ˙ ξ(s)˙ I,α,1ξ (s)I,α,2(334)˙ I,α,kξ (s)I,α,k+1 (1 − δ kK) , k = 2, ..., K(335)<strong>and</strong> all orbitals at a given imaginary time slice s are thermostatted by one suchthermostat chain of length L[ ]∑ 〈〉Q e 1¨η(s) 1 = 2 µ φ (s) ∣i ∣φ (s)i− Te0 − Q e 1 ˙η(s) 1 ˙η (s)2 (336)i[ ( ) ] 2Q e l ¨η (s)l= Q e l−1 ˙η (s) 1l−1 −β e− Q e l ˙η (s)l˙η (s)l+1 (1 − δ lL) , l = 2, . . ., L ; (337)note that for st<strong>and</strong>ard ab <strong>initio</strong> path integral runs as discussed in the previoussection the centroid mode should be thermostatted as well. The desired fictitiouskinetic energy of the electronic subsystem Te 0 can be determined based on a shortequivalent classical Car–Parrinello run with P = 1 <strong>and</strong> using again the relation1/β e = 2Te 0 /6N e ′ where N e ′ is the number of orbitals. The mass parameters {Q e l }associated to the orbital thermostats are the same as those defined in Eq. (271),whereas the single mass parameter Q n for the nuclei is determined by the harmonicinteraction <strong>and</strong> is given by Q n = k B T/ωP 2 = β/P. The characteristic thermostat116
- Page 1 and 2:
John von Neumann Institute for Comp
- Page 4:
2500Number200015001000CP PRL 1985AI
- Page 7 and 8:
The goal of this section is to deri
- Page 9:
¡the Newtonian equation of motion
- Page 13 and 14:
Ehrenfest molecular dynamics is cer
- Page 15 and 16:
the Car-Parrinello approach 108 , s
- Page 17:
According to the Car-Parrinello equ
- Page 20 and 21:
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of the x-c
- Page 22 and 23:
Up to this point the entire discuss
- Page 24 and 25:
parameters are those used to repres
- Page 26 and 27:
in terms of a linear combination of
- Page 28 and 29:
structure calculations, see e.g. Re
- Page 30 and 31:
“unbound electrons” dissolved i
- Page 32 and 33:
Table 1. Timings in cpu seconds and
- Page 34 and 35:
stressed that the energy conservati
- Page 36 and 37:
see e.g. the discussion following E
- Page 38 and 39:
from a set of one-particle spin orb
- Page 40 and 41:
is used, which represents exactly a
- Page 42 and 43:
2.8.3 Generalized Plane WavesAn ext
- Page 44 and 45:
disposable parameters that can be o
- Page 46 and 47:
The index i runs over all states an
- Page 48 and 49:
f(G) are related by three-dimension
- Page 50 and 51:
where j l are spherical Bessel func
- Page 52 and 53:
andE self = ∑ I1√2πZ 2 IR c I.
- Page 54 and 55:
¢££¤¤¢¢¢n tot (G)inv FTn to
- Page 56 and 57:
correlation energyΩ ∑E xc = ε x
- Page 58 and 59:
3.4 Total Energy, Gradients, and St
- Page 60 and 61:
3.4.3 Gradient for Nuclear Position
- Page 62 and 63:
The local part of the pseudopotenti
- Page 64 and 65:
¢¢¢¢¢i = 1 . . .N b¢c i (G)¢
- Page 66 and 67: ¢¢¢¢¢c i (G)123g, E self∆V I
- Page 68 and 69: where G c is a free parameter that
- Page 70 and 71: and a matrix form of the Gram-Schmi
- Page 72 and 73: The two sets of equations are coupl
- Page 74 and 75: introducing different masses for di
- Page 76 and 77: The Lagrange multiplier have to be
- Page 78 and 79: Table 3. Relative size of character
- Page 80 and 81: of the G vectors, and only real ope
- Page 82 and 83: CALL SGEMM(’T’,’N’,M,N b ,2
- Page 84 and 85: ing standard communication librarie
- Page 86 and 87: over processors. All processors sho
- Page 88 and 89: ab = 2 * sdot(2 * N p D ,A(1),1,B(1
- Page 90 and 91: ENDCALL ParallelFFT3D("INV",scr1,sc
- Page 92 and 93: are the improved load-balancing for
- Page 94 and 95: situations where• it is necessary
- Page 96 and 97: espectively), but completely analog
- Page 98 and 99: 4.2.3 Imposing Pressure: BarostatsK
- Page 100 and 101: in the previous section. The isobar
- Page 102 and 103: 4.3.2 Many Excited States: Free Ene
- Page 104 and 105: down the generalization of the Helm
- Page 106 and 107: free energy functional discussed in
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 16. Four patterns of spin de
- Page 110 and 111: and electrons r = {r i } can be wri
- Page 112 and 113: The effective classical partition f
- Page 114 and 115: up e.g. in Refs. 132,37,596,597,428
- Page 118 and 119: frequency of the electronic degrees
- Page 120 and 121: 5.2 Solids, Polymers, and Materials
- Page 122 and 123: the penetration of the oxidation la
- Page 124 and 125: in terms of their electronic struct
- Page 126 and 127: culations on very accurate global p
- Page 128 and 129: AcknowledgmentsOur knowledge on ab
- Page 130 and 131: 57. M. Bernasconi, G. L. Chiarotti,
- Page 132 and 133: Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)
- Page 134 and 135: 175. E. Ermakova, J. Solca, H. Hube
- Page 136 and 137: 244. H. Goldstein, Klassische Mecha
- Page 138 and 139: 313. T. Ikeda, M. Sprik, K. Terakur
- Page 140 and 141: 384. N. A. Marks, D. R. McKenzie, B
- Page 142 and 143: 442. S. Nosé and M. L. Klein, Mol.
- Page 144 and 145: 502. L. M. Ramaniah, M. Bernasconi,
- Page 146 and 147: 562. F. Shimojo, K. Hoshino, and Y.
- Page 148 and 149: 620. A. Tongraar, K. R. Liedl, and
- Page 150: 682. R. M. Wentzcovitch, Phys. Rev.