Striped Mullet FMP - NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources

More documents

Recommendations

Info

on each multi-gear trip ticket for the following summary.Current gear types in the fishery (1994 - 2002)An average of 92% of all landings are annually harvested by gill nets (runaround, set,and drift nets) since 1994. The runaround gill net is responsible for the greatest, singleproportion (49%) of total, annual landings in the striped mullet fishery [1994-2002 (Table 6.3;Figure 6.14)]. Set gill nets (combined sinking and floating) annually produced 42% of theharvest from 1994 to 2002. On average, beach seines were responsible for 5.4% of the annualharvest, and cast nets yielded 1.1% from 1994 to 2002.Table 6.3. Average yearly striped mullet landings by gear: 1994 – 2002.PercentGearAverage yearlylandings (lb)totallandingsGill net (runaround) 1,070,382 49.0%Gill net set (sink) 505,780 23.2%Gill net set (float) 420,950 19.3%Gill net (unknown) 5,119 0.7%Beach seine 17,383 5.4%Cast net 24,158 1.1%Pound net 12,210 0.6%Long haul seine 8,853 0.4%Others (28) 7,886 0.4%Gill netsRunaround gill netsThe importance of runaround gill nets has steadily increased since 1972 (Figure 6.14).Runaround gill netting was a major harvest producer in historic records during the late 1930s(59% of total harvest in 1939), although inconsistency in commercial sampling precludes a moredetailed historical fishing gear analysis prior to 1972. The continuing surge in the mid 1990s inrunaround gill net landings may have been bolstered by the 1995 gill net closure in Florida Statewaters. Anecdotal reports from North Carolina fishermen indicate an influx of Florida stripedmullet fishermen into North Carolina and subsequent improvements in harvesting methods.More jet drive boats, spotting towers, night fishing, and runaround gill netting were reported bythe mid 1990s. Also, expanded fishery rules requiring gill net attendance in additional areas ofNorth Carolina was required for small mesh gill nets (less than 5 inches stretch diameter)beginning in 1998, which may have further prompted a shift from set nets to runaround fishingfor mullets. However, the number of trips with runaround gill net landings has not risen since1997 and landings have increased only slightly (Figure 6.15).37
Landings (lb1,600,0001,400,0001,200,0001,000,000800,000600,000400,000200,0000Landings% of Total Landings2002200120001999199819971996199519941993199219911990198919881987198619851984198319821981198019791978197719761975197419731972Year60%50%40%30%20%10%0%% of Total LandingsFigure 6.14. Yearly landings and percentage of total yearly landings of striped mullet harvestedby runaround gill net: 1972 - 2002.Landings (lb)1,600,0001,400,0001,200,0001,000,000800,000600,000400,000200,0000Landings (lb) No. Trips1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002Year3,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000Percent of total landingsFigure 6.15.Yearly striped mullet landings and number of trips in the runaround gill netfishery: 1994 - 2002.Most runaround gill net trips and landings occur in October and November during the roeseason (Figure 6.16). Mesh sizes range from 2 ¾ in. to 5 in. stretch, although most runaroundnets are between 3 1/8 and 4 in. stretch mesh (DMF data).Ninety-four percent of runaround gill net landings are distributed among 14 waterbodies,with the largest contributions from Pamlico Sound (21%), Neuse River (16%), Core Sound(11%), and the Inland Waterway [9% (Table 6.4)]. Runaround gill netting has increasedconsiderably in Croatan Sound since 1994, increasing from 0.005% of the total runaroundharvest in 1994 to 13% in 2002. Runaround landings from other waterbodies have fluctuatedwithout much trend from 1994 to 2002 (Figure 6.17).38
Page 5 and 6: 9.1.4 Characterization of the Bait
Page 7 and 8: estoration are essential to accompl
Page 9 and 10: . Recommend management actions pert
Page 11 and 12: 4.4.1 Environmental degradationSuit
Page 13 and 14: History Note: Authority G.S. 113-13
Page 15 and 16: 76° 28.6000' W; to a point at 34°
Page 17 and 18: times specified for the identified
Page 19 and 20: 5. STATUS OF STOCK5.1 GENERAL LIFE
Page 21 and 22: microalgae, phytoplankton and zoopl
Page 23 and 24: North Carolina spans September to M
Page 25 and 26: 200 mm FL [Leard et al. 1995 (Appen
Page 27 and 28: Young-of-the-year and Juvenile Move
Page 29 and 30: surveys provided indices of adult C
Page 31 and 32: 6. STATUS OF FISHERIES6.1 COMMERCIA
Page 33 and 34: adjusted for inflationValue of the
Page 35 and 36: a.GSI151050Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Page 37 and 38: 6.1.6 Primary Waterbodies of Harves
Page 39 and 40: 25,000No. Trips% of Total Landings0
Page 41: 6.1.9 Major gear types used in the
Page 45 and 46: 40%Pamlico S. Neuse R. Core S.Inlan
Page 47 and 48: Landings (lb)1,400,0001,200,0001,00
Page 49 and 50: movement of schooling fish so that
Page 51 and 52: Landings (lb)45,00040,00035,00030,0
Page 53 and 54: Table 6.6.Number of mullets (stripe
Page 55 and 56: Table 6.8.Estimated catch statistic
Page 57 and 58: ex-vessel prices began to drop due
Page 59 and 60: 60%50%43%48%40%Percent30%20%10%0%Gi
Page 61 and 62: 7.2.3 Marketing, Distribution, and
Page 63 and 64: (RCGL) who are licensed to use limi
Page 65 and 66: trip where striped mullet were land
Page 67 and 68: didn’t fish all year, fishing act
Page 69 and 70: 8. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS8.1 HABITAT
Page 71 and 72: Seagrass meadows are a complex ecos
Page 73 and 74: early 1980s (Khalil 1997).Oxygen De
Page 75 and 76: fish, (2) Season for taking fish, a
Page 77 and 78: 9. PRINCIPAL ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT
Page 79 and 80: enhance protection of water quality
Page 81 and 82: ecreational gill netting of adult f
Page 83 and 84: 9.1.8 Management Implications of Pr
Page 85 and 86: 6. Annual review of commercial and
Page 87 and 88: Blanton, J. O., F. E. Werner, A. Ka
Page 89 and 90: Foster, J.R. 2001. Data analysis su
Page 91 and 92: Mahmoudi, B., Foushee, L., McGlothi
Page 93 and 94:
Pattillo, M.E., Czapla, T.E., Nelso
Page 95 and 96:
Taylor, H. F. 1951. Survey of marin
Page 97 and 98:
11. APPENDICES11.1 Appendix 1 GLOSS
Page 99 and 100:
Table 2. Size at annuli formation (
Page 101 and 102:
11.2 Appendix 2 BYCATCH ASSESSMENT
Page 103 and 104:
have mandatory observer coverage fo
Page 105 and 106:
the Pamlico, Pungo, and Neuse River
Page 107 and 108:
and 2002 were quantified based upon
Page 109 and 110:
sets. These were caught in Outer Ba
Page 111 and 112:
Fishery-dependent and fishery-indep
Page 113 and 114:
Table 3.Comparison of striped mulle
Page 115 and 116:
Unmarketable bycatchIn 1999 and 200
Page 117 and 118:
SECTION .0100 - NET RULES, GENERAL.
Page 119 and 120:
11.3 Appendix 3 CHARACTERIZATION OF
Page 121 and 122:
100%Striped MulletWhite Mullet90%87
Page 123 and 124:
Table 1.Number and weight of stripe
Page 125 and 126:
The fall commercial cast net landin
Page 127 and 128:
2. Minimum size limit+ Reduced harv
Page 129 and 130:
Advisory Committee Recommendation:T
Page 131 and 132:
21.81.6FcurrentF25% = 1.25F30% = 0.
Page 133 and 134:
Limited EntryA limited entry system
Page 135 and 136:
and in fisheries targeting perches
Page 137 and 138:
Fran and Floyd likely depressed lan
Page 139 and 140:
3. Implementation of Regulationsa.
Page 141 and 142:
11.5 Appendix 5 PIER, STOP NET AND
Page 143 and 144:
distance can be established to sepa
Page 145 and 146:
11.6 Appendix 6 INSHORE STRIPED MUL
Page 147 and 148:
2. Adopt 24 hour, 365 day per year
Page 149 and 150:
III.DISCUSSIONIn 1994, the DMF impl
Page 151 and 152:
- contentious relations with NMFS o
Page 153 and 154:
Fisheries by proclamation, shall be
Page 155 and 156:
Supplement 2. North Carolina Marine
Page 157 and 158:
mesh webbing to capture monkfish in
Page 159 and 160:
12. ATTACHMENTS12.1 Attachment 1. P
Page 161 and 162:
data were used for defining F-based
Page 163 and 164:
stock. The stock has been recognize
Page 165 and 166:
Table 1.Von Bertalanffy growth para
Page 167 and 168:
Length-Weight RelationshipA linear,
Page 169 and 170:
Table 2.Various instantaneous natur
Page 171 and 172:
age using DMF male and female age-l
Page 173 and 174:
affected by schooling artifacts and
Page 175 and 176:
whereas age 0 fish comprise the bul
Page 177 and 178:
Alosid Seine Survey CPUEStandard Er
Page 179 and 180:
Table 12. Annual length composition
Page 181 and 182:
growth, longevity, and harvest char
Page 183 and 184:
Table 15. Model-estimated von Berta
Page 185 and 186:
Selectivity .1.00.80.60.40.20.0Age
Page 187 and 188:
Table 20. Age specific commercial f
Page 189 and 190:
Table 23. Full year, commercial + r
Page 191 and 192:
assessment, peaking in 2002 (Figure
Page 193 and 194:
Fishing Mortality (F)2.01.51.00.50.
Page 195 and 196:
low, and F high were based on histo
Page 197 and 198:
Discussion:Age-growthThe growth cur
Page 199 and 200:
6+ females between 1994-2002.Overfi
Page 201 and 202:
assessment, as overfishing occurred
Page 203 and 204:
The future economics of the roe fis
Page 205 and 206:
References CitedAlagaraja, K. 1984.
Page 207:
McGurk, M.D. 1999. Size dependent m
show all

Striped Mullet FMP - NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?