12.07.2015 Views

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BondBond length (Å) Bond order Bond strain (k Cal/mol)Neutral Ionic Neutral Ionic Neutral IonicC1-C2 1.541 1.542 0.965 0.970 0.206 0.189Cl-C6 1.525 1.531 0.984 0.983 0.049 0.208Cl-C10 1.533 1.542 0.973 0.962 0.049 0.101C2-C3 1.548 1.547 0.969 0.971 0.457 0.639C2-C7 1.518 1.520 0.969 0.974 0.252 0.290C3-C4 1.519 1.519 0.993 0.996 0.034 0.071C4-C5 1.518 1.515 0.992 0.997 0.107 0.004C5-C6 1.526 1.522 0.987 0.992 0.174 0.095C7-C8 1.403 1.405 1.376 1.365 0.082 0.140C7-C14 1.395 1.393 1.424 1.442 0.084 0.097C8-C9 1.493 1.491 0.990 0.997 0.035 0.058C8-C11 1.396 1.397 1.409 1.401 0.044 0.047C9-C10 1.533 1.535 0.971 0.959 0.073 0.115C11-C12 1.388 1.387 1.429 1.444 0.007 0.003C12-C13 1.389 1.401 1.373 1.360 0.015 0.010C13-C14 1.400 1.405 1.371 1.351 0.012 0.015C13-C15 1.382 1.372 1.029 1.067 0.038 0.038C15-C16 1.406 1.409 0.987 0.980 0.008 0.009C10-N17 1.503 1.484 0.972 0.961 0.226 0.192C2-C18 1.545 1.547 0.964 0.967 0.118 0.178C18-C19 1.524 1.525 0.990 0.980 0.075 0.031N17-C20 1.480 1.450 0.997 1.013 0.057 0.063C19-N17 1.492 1.460 0.980 0.994 0.092 0.059Table 3: Comparison <strong>of</strong> computed bond length, bond order <strong>and</strong> bond strain (k Cal mol -1 ) using PM3 method for neutral <strong>and</strong> molecular cation.ness <strong>of</strong> the bond. After an easy disruption <strong>of</strong> this bond,the subsequent bond is C 2–C 18(bond order = 0.967, bondlength = 1.54 7Aº <strong>and</strong> bond strain = 0.178 K cal mol -1 ). Disruption<strong>of</strong> these two bonds (C10–N 17<strong>and</strong> C 2–C 18) formeda fragment ion at m/z = 214 by loss C 3H 7N (bridge) fromthe molecular ion. The subsequent loss <strong>of</strong> C 9H 11O (rupture<strong>of</strong> the B ring) formed the fragment ion C 6H 10at m/z = 82,which can lead to a loss <strong>of</strong> H 2to form the fragment ionC 6H 8at m/z = 80 (process 1, scheme 1). One can concludethat process 1 is the principal one for DMP, which can helpto interpret TA decomposition.The primary TA decomposition <strong>of</strong> DMP (wt loss =4.1%) between 100 ºC <strong>and</strong> 150ºC was mainly due to loss<strong>of</strong> water. It was followed by a mass loss <strong>of</strong> 32.5% between150 ºC <strong>and</strong> 350ºC. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the MO calculation(Table 2), C 2–C 18was the first bond cleavage <strong>of</strong> neutralsystem having the lowest bond order at 0.964 with a longbond length (1.545 ºA) <strong>and</strong> large bond strain (0.118 k calmol -1 ) followed by C 10–N 17(bond order = 0.972, bondlength = 1.503 Aº <strong>and</strong> bond strain = 0.226 k cal mol -1 ).As a result <strong>of</strong> the disruption <strong>of</strong> these two bonds, C 2–C18<strong>and</strong> C 10–N 17lost the bridge C 3H 7N. The wt loss <strong>of</strong> 32.5%resulted from the bridge <strong>and</strong> HBr molecule (C 3H 7N +HBr). The subsequent third mass loss <strong>of</strong> 54.57% occurredat 350-450ºC <strong>and</strong> may be attributed to the loss <strong>of</strong>OCH 3C 6H 4CH 2CH 2(i.e., C 9H 11O) via the cleavage <strong>of</strong> theB-ring (C 2–C 7<strong>and</strong> C 1–C 10).The final mass loss <strong>of</strong> 5.68%, which occurred at temperaturerange 450-600ºC, may be attributed to the loss <strong>of</strong> theremainder <strong>of</strong> the drug molecule. It is possible to rationalisethe thermal degradation scheme 2 as follows.The dextromethorphan (DMP-HBr) neutral compoundis stable up to 150ºC before being fragmented by the loss<strong>of</strong> the bridge C 3H 7N + HBr, whereas codeine fragments at160 o C [26]. In contrast, the molecular ion <strong>of</strong> DMP is RI =30%, while the molecular ion <strong>of</strong> codeine is considered thebase peak (RI = 100%). This high stability <strong>of</strong> codeine maybe due to the presence <strong>of</strong> OH <strong>and</strong> O atoms in its skeleton.This work provides further insights into utility <strong>of</strong> experimentalTA <strong>and</strong> MS techniques <strong>and</strong> a theoretical investigationwith MO calculation using the semi-empiricalPM3 procedure on DMP. From the practical <strong>and</strong> theoreticaltechniques, we concluded that the primary fragmentation<strong>of</strong> DMP is initiated by the loss <strong>of</strong> C 3H 7N + HBr in26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!