12.07.2015 Views

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

neurotoxicity and mechanisms of induced hyperexcitability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sisted <strong>of</strong> consecutive interruptions <strong>of</strong> at least four beamswithin a period <strong>of</strong> 500 ms. Small, repetitive beam breakswithin a virtual box <strong>of</strong> 4 x 4 beams around the rat wererecorded as stereotypic counts. Recordings <strong>of</strong> photocellbeam interruptions by the rat were taken every 5 min<strong>and</strong> stored by the computer s<strong>of</strong>tware. Three locomotoractivity tests were done after treatment with saline, 0.5mg/kg <strong>of</strong> amphetamine or 2.5 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> phencyclidine administeredin a r<strong>and</strong>om order. These locomotor activitytests were done with three to four day intervals to preventhabituation due to repeated testing <strong>and</strong> to allow forclearance <strong>of</strong> the drugs. Prior to any drug manipulation,the rats were placed in the locomotor photocell cages for30 min to establish baseline locomotor activity <strong>and</strong> allowfor habituation to the test environment. After 30 min <strong>of</strong>spontaneous baseline activity, the rats were injected <strong>and</strong>locomotor activity was recorded over a further 90 min,generating a total session time <strong>of</strong> two hours. For the purpose<strong>of</strong> this paper, locomotor activity data were expressedas cumulative data from 30 min periods <strong>and</strong> presented asa time course <strong>of</strong> distance moved during the 30 min beforeinjection <strong>and</strong> 90 min after injection.After locomotor activity experiments, rats were testedfor prepulse inhibition. This was done using six automatedstartle chambers (SR-LAB, San Diego Instruments, SanDiego, CA, USA) consisting <strong>of</strong> clear Plexiglas cylinders, 9cm in diameter, resting on a platform inside a ventilated,sound-attenuated <strong>and</strong> illuminated chamber. A speakermounted 24 cm above the cylinder produced both continuousbackground noise at 70 dB <strong>and</strong> the various acousticstimuli. Whole-body startle responses <strong>of</strong> the animal in responseto acoustic stimuli caused vibrations <strong>of</strong> the Plexiglascylinder, which were then converted into quantitativeresponses by a piezoelectric accelerometer unit attachedbeneath the platform. The percent prepulse inhibition wascalculated as 100 x {[pulse-alone trials – (prepulse + pulsetrials )] /(pulse-alone trials)} [31]. At least one day beforethe prepulse inhibition testing, rats underwent a pretestsession where they were exposed to the testing cylinders<strong>and</strong> the testing protocol for the first time. This session wasconducted to allow rats to habituate to the testing environment.Each rat was placed into the chamber for a 5 minacclimation period with a 70 dB background noise levelthat continued throughout the session. A single prepulseinhibition session lasted for about 45 min <strong>and</strong> consisted<strong>of</strong> high- <strong>and</strong> low-intensity stimulus combinations with acontinuous background noise <strong>of</strong> 70 dB. The session started<strong>and</strong> ended with a block <strong>of</strong> ten pulse-alone trials <strong>of</strong> 115dB. These blocks, together with twenty pseudo-r<strong>and</strong>omlypresented pulse-alone trials during the prepulse inhibitionprotocol, were used to calculate the basal startle reactivity<strong>and</strong> startle habituation. Prepulses were presented for 20 ms<strong>and</strong> differed in intensity. Prepulse inhibition was assessedby the r<strong>and</strong>om presentation <strong>of</strong> 115 dB pulses, ten each <strong>of</strong>prepulse-2, -4, -8, 12 <strong>and</strong> –16 <strong>and</strong> ten ‘no-stimulus’ trials.For example, prepulse-8 (PP8) is a 20-ms prepulse <strong>of</strong> 8 dBabove the background noise, i.e., 78 dB, followed 100 mslater by a 40-ms 115 dB pulse [58]. The interval betweentrials varied (10 - 37 s) to prevent conditioning <strong>of</strong> the responses.A microcomputer <strong>and</strong> an interface assembly thatcontrolled the delivery <strong>of</strong> acoustic stimuli digitised <strong>and</strong> recordedthe readings.Tissue preparation for histology <strong>and</strong> high pressureliquid chromatography (HPLC)At the end <strong>of</strong> the experiments, rats were killed by decapitation<strong>and</strong> the brains were removed from the skull.The brains were placed on a cold plate. First, the frontalcortex was dissected bilaterally [59], <strong>and</strong> then the mPFCwas dissected out. For the histological assessment <strong>of</strong> thelocation <strong>of</strong> the injection sites, 20-μm-thick sections <strong>of</strong> themedial prefrontal cortex <strong>of</strong> two mPFC-lesioned rats werecut on a cryostat <strong>and</strong> mounted onto gelatin-coated glassslides. The sections were then stained with cresyl violet(ProSciTech, Thuringowa, QLD, Australia) <strong>and</strong> examinedmicroscopically to verify the location <strong>of</strong> the tips <strong>of</strong> theinfusion cannulas.The HPLC measurements <strong>of</strong> the tissue serotonin (5-HT)concentration were carried out in 23 animals. The dissectedstructures were weighed <strong>and</strong> stored in Eppendorf tubes at–80°C until the biochemical assays were performed. The tissuesamples were homogenised in 500 μl <strong>of</strong> 0.1 M perchloricacid by ultrasonication <strong>and</strong> centrifuged at 15,500 g for 5min. A 50 μl aliquot <strong>of</strong> the supernatant was injected into ahigh pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system to determinethe content <strong>of</strong> 5-HT (ng/mg tissue <strong>of</strong> wet weight).The HPLC system consisted <strong>of</strong> a Waters Model 510 Solventdelivery system, a Waters U6K injector, an Alphabond C18125A 10 U 150* 3.9 mm column <strong>and</strong> a Column & Spectra-Physics 970 D-A1 fluorescence spectrometer. The outputsignal from the fluorescence detector was analysed with thechromatography s<strong>of</strong>tware package, 810 Baseline, version3.31. The mobile phase used consisted <strong>of</strong> 9.8 g/l KH 2PO 4, 1.0g/l Na 2EDTA, 5% acetonitrile <strong>and</strong> 1 ml/l triethylamine. ThepH <strong>of</strong> the mobile phase solution was adjusted to 3.0 with 1M HCl. Subsequently, the solution was filtered <strong>and</strong> degassed<strong>and</strong> delivered to the HPLC at a flow rate <strong>of</strong> 1 ml/min. Priorto sample testing, the following st<strong>and</strong>ards for 5-HT were runthrough the system: 12.5 ng/ml, 25 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml <strong>and</strong> 200 ng/ml. Calibration curves were constructed, <strong>and</strong>the level <strong>of</strong> 5-HT in tissue samples was calculated relativeto these st<strong>and</strong>ards. Each run lasted 8 min <strong>and</strong> the retentiontime for serotonin was 2.6 min.Statistical analysisData were expressed as the mean ± the st<strong>and</strong>ard error<strong>of</strong> the mean (SEM). All <strong>of</strong> the statistical analyses were performedusing the statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware package SYSTAT 9.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All <strong>of</strong> the data were analysedusing an analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) with repeatedmeasures where appropriate. In the locomotor activity experiments,data were summed in 30-min blocks, <strong>and</strong> theseblocks were used to assess the main effects <strong>of</strong> the lesiontype (group), the treatment with amphetamine or phency-14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!