View - ResearchGate
View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate
70 Uversky et al.in protein function. Importantly, bioinformatics played a key role in transforminga set of anecdotal examples of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), whichwere originally considered to be intriguing exceptions within the protein realm,into a very promising branch of protein science.1.1. Defining and Identifying IDPsIDPs or ID protein regions are those that fail to form specific three-dimensional(3D) structure under physiological conditions in vitro. They are also known as partiallyfolded (3), flexible (4), mobile (5), rheomorphic (6), natively denatured (7),natively unfolded (8), intrinsically unstructured (9), ID(10), and natively disordered(11). Furthermore, several other names representing different combinationsof “natively, naturally, and intrinsically” with “unfolded, unstructured, flexible,mobile, and denatured,” are present in literature (12). The interested reader willfind the discussion of the etymology of the term “ID” in a recent review (13). Incontrast to the ordered proteins, the atoms and dihedral angles of IDPs do not haveequilibrium positions. Instead, IDPs exist as highly dynamic ensembles whoseatoms and backbone Ramachandran angles fluctuate significantly over time. AnID region can be as short as a few amino acid residues, or it can propagate throughthe long disordered loops, ends, domains, or even through entire proteins (13). Inthe authors’ view, an IDP is a protein that contains at least one disordered region.Functional ID regions exist in at least two different structural forms: moltenglobule-like (collapsed) and random coil-like (extended) (14). Later, the existenceof another functional disordered form, the premolten globule, which appears to bea distinct category between extended and molten-globular conformations, wassuggested (15). Thus, protein function might be associated with three (or four)distinct conformations: ordered, molten globule, (premolten globule), andrandom coil, and with the transitions between them. These hypotheses are knownas the protein-trinity (14) or protein-quartet models (15).IDPs can be identified by the variety of physicochemical methods elaborated tocharacterize protein structure and self-organization. These methods include missingelectron density in X-ray crystallography maps (16); nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy (for recent reviews see refs. 11 and 17–20 and referencestherein); circular dichroism spectroscopy in the near-ultraviolet (21) and far-ultravioletregions (22–25); optical rotatory dispersion spectroscopy (ORD) (22,25); Fouriertransform infased spectroscopy (FTIR) (25); Raman spectroscopy and Ramanoptical activity (26); fluorescence spectroscopy (27,28); gel-filtration, viscometry,small-angle X-ray scattering, small-angle neutron scattering, sedimentation, anddynamic and static light scattering (27–29); limited proteolysis (30–34); aberrantmobility in sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis (35,36); conformationalstability (27,37–40); hydrogen/deuterium exchange (H/D exchange) (28);immunochemical methods (41,42); interaction with molecular chaperones
- Page 110: Estimating Gene Function With LS-NM
- Page 114: Estimating Gene Function With LS-NM
- Page 118: Estimating Gene Function With LS-NM
- Page 122: 50 Gonye et al.activity and problem
- Page 126: 52 Gonye et al.Currently, PAINT can
- Page 130: 54 Gonye et al.dynamic nature of th
- Page 136: Prediction Using PAINT 57represente
- Page 140: Prediction Using PAINT 59In PAINT,
- Page 144: Prediction Using PAINT 6114. On the
- Page 148: Prediction Using PAINT 634.2. Size
- Page 152: 65Fig. 4. Localization of enrichmen
- Page 156: Prediction Using PAINT 673. Okubo,
- Page 160: 5Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder a
- Page 166: 72 Uversky et al.sequence space and
- Page 170: Table 1 (Continued)Server name URL
- Page 174: 76 Uversky et al.1.5. When to Use t
- Page 178: 78 Uversky et al.elucidating compos
- Page 182: Table 2Averaged Frequencies of Diff
- Page 186: 82 Uversky et al.the box Raw Output
- Page 190: 84 Uversky et al.peculiarities of t
- Page 194: 86 Uversky et al.Fig. 4. Prediction
- Page 198: 88 Uversky et al.13. Uversky, V. N.
- Page 202: 90 Uversky et al.50. Vucetic, S., O
- Page 206: 92 Uversky et al.84. Ritter, L. M.,
- Page 210: 6Sybil: Methods and Software for Mu
70 Uversky et al.in protein function. Importantly, bioinformatics played a key role in transforminga set of anecdotal examples of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), whichwere originally considered to be intriguing exceptions within the protein realm,into a very promising branch of protein science.1.1. Defining and Identifying IDPsIDPs or ID protein regions are those that fail to form specific three-dimensional(3D) structure under physiological conditions in vitro. They are also known as partiallyfolded (3), flexible (4), mobile (5), rheomorphic (6), natively denatured (7),natively unfolded (8), intrinsically unstructured (9), ID(10), and natively disordered(11). Furthermore, several other names representing different combinationsof “natively, naturally, and intrinsically” with “unfolded, unstructured, flexible,mobile, and denatured,” are present in literature (12). The interested reader willfind the discussion of the etymology of the term “ID” in a recent review (13). Incontrast to the ordered proteins, the atoms and dihedral angles of IDPs do not haveequilibrium positions. Instead, IDPs exist as highly dynamic ensembles whoseatoms and backbone Ramachandran angles fluctuate significantly over time. AnID region can be as short as a few amino acid residues, or it can propagate throughthe long disordered loops, ends, domains, or even through entire proteins (13). Inthe authors’ view, an IDP is a protein that contains at least one disordered region.Functional ID regions exist in at least two different structural forms: moltenglobule-like (collapsed) and random coil-like (extended) (14). Later, the existenceof another functional disordered form, the premolten globule, which appears to bea distinct category between extended and molten-globular conformations, wassuggested (15). Thus, protein function might be associated with three (or four)distinct conformations: ordered, molten globule, (premolten globule), andrandom coil, and with the transitions between them. These hypotheses are knownas the protein-trinity (14) or protein-quartet models (15).IDPs can be identified by the variety of physicochemical methods elaborated tocharacterize protein structure and self-organization. These methods include missingelectron density in X-ray crystallography maps (16); nuclear magnetic resonancespectroscopy (for recent reviews see refs. 11 and 17–20 and referencestherein); circular dichroism spectroscopy in the near-ultraviolet (21) and far-ultravioletregions (22–25); optical rotatory dispersion spectroscopy (ORD) (22,25); Fouriertransform infased spectroscopy (FTIR) (25); Raman spectroscopy and Ramanoptical activity (26); fluorescence spectroscopy (27,28); gel-filtration, viscometry,small-angle X-ray scattering, small-angle neutron scattering, sedimentation, anddynamic and static light scattering (27–29); limited proteolysis (30–34); aberrantmobility in sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis (35,36); conformationalstability (27,37–40); hydrogen/deuterium exchange (H/D exchange) (28);immunochemical methods (41,42); interaction with molecular chaperones