Quality Manual - KSS Deanery

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(updated 3 May 2012)AGREED PROPOSAL FOR A JOINT DEANERY COMMITTEE ON QUALITY MANAGEMENTOF TRAINING BETWEEN LONDON AND KSSBackground1. Both deaneries recognise that training and trainees will continue to cross SHA/localprovider boundaries as part of future programmes of training.2. Both deaneries/SHAs have to assure the GMC there are comprehensive qualitymanagement arrangements in place which local education provider will want to have theminimum number of bodies, ideally one, overseeing their quality management andcontrol arrangements.3. Both deaneries have already agreed we continue the current position where eachdeanery takes responsibility for posts and the educational environment within theirgeographical area.Initial Terms of Reference of the Joint Deanery Committee1. To discuss and share current quality management arrangements within the twodeaneries.2. To look for areas of agreement over commonality of process both now and in the future.3. To share reports, results and information on issues that have arisen from QualityManagement arrangements taking place within home deanery boundaries that mightaffect trainees in a programme being managed by another Lead Provider/Deanery.4. To act as a source of joint support and trouble shooting for “difficult or wicked” problems.5. To ensure that all such problems are escalated to the relevant Postgraduate Dean orResponsible Officer in a timely fashion.6. To share and log information about all trainees in difficulty that cross-deaneryboundaries.7. To keep the GMC informed of all activities, usually through the Deanery Report (DR) ofeach organisation. Both deaneries will agree the joint exception reporting in DRsinvolving cross-boundary programmes.8. Terms of Reference to be annually reviewed.Membership1. The deans responsible for postgraduate Secondary Care education from London andKSS.2. The Directors of the London Foundation School and the South Thames FoundationSchool.3. The Associate Dean for Quality in KSS and the two Trust liaison deans in South London.4. The Quality Managers of both Deaneries.5. The General Practice Deans of both Deaneries.6. KSS Education Department representative, as required.7. A Foundation trainee representative, alternating annually between Deaneries.8. A Specialty trainee representative, alternating annually between Deaneries.Meetings1. The group will meet three times per year, alternating meeting venue between KSSDeanery, STFS and London Deanery offices.2. The group will elect its own chairman on an annual basis
(updated 3 May 2012)3. The Quality Managers of the two Deaneries will be responsible for administering theCommittee. Primary administrative responsibility will normally alternate so that theadministrating manager comes from the other deanery from that of the chair.
Page 1: KENT SURREY AND SUSSEX DEANERYQUALI
Page 4 and 5: 1. Quality Structure and Terms of R
Page 6 and 7: E. Headline Feedback FormK:\QUALITY
Page 8 and 9: G. Earned Autonomy Verification Rep
Page 10 and 11: Postgraduate Deanery for Kent, Surr
Page 12 and 13: KSS DEANERY QUALITY MANAGEMENT STEE
Page 14 and 15: The Deanery Board will:DEANERY BOAR
Page 16 and 17: KSS DEANERY OPERATIONAL GROUPMEMBER
Page 18 and 19: KSS HIGHER SPECIALTY TRAINING BOARD
Page 20 and 21: KSS TRAINEE IN DIFFICULTY COMMITTEE
Page 22 and 23: KENT SURREY & SUSSEX DEANERYGENERAL
Page 24 and 25: • To maintain and progress facult
Page 26 and 27: Lay/Patient RepresentativeBrighton
Page 28 and 29: 6. Quorum:Meeting will be quorate i
Page 30 and 31: Doc EKENT SURREY & SUSSEX DEANERYGE
Page 32 and 33: • The School will adopt new proce
Page 34 and 35: • To advise on the provision of a
Page 36 and 37: Representative members will be expe
Page 38 and 39: Decisions made by formal vote will
Page 40 and 41: Doc AConstitution/Terms of Referenc
Page 42 and 43: Constitution/Terms of Reference/Mem
Page 44 and 45: Constitution/Terms of Reference/Mem
Page 48 and 49: Kent, Surrey & Sussex DeaneryQUALIT
Page 50 and 51: Producing the KSS Deanery ReportTim
Page 52 and 53: KSS DEANERY LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDE
Page 56 and 57: Doc Ref: QMV-PRO-001Version 1.6Kent
Page 58 and 59: When the HoS have decided which LEP
Page 60 and 61: 8. ExternalityIn line with GMC requ
Page 62 and 63: 14. Visiting Team Pro FormaEvidence
Page 64 and 65: After receiving the verbal feedback
Page 66 and 67: All responses to mandatory requirem
Page 71 and 72: Kent, Surrey & Sussex DeaneryProces
Page 73 and 74: Last LEP Visit ReportFaculty Handbo
Page 75 and 76: Specialty 2 Name5.5.5.6.5.7.5.8.Spe
Page 77 and 78: Section 3123456Notable PracticeNote
Page 79 and 80: Areas for ImprovementDomainAreas Re
Page 81 and 82: The following recommendations are s
Page 83 and 84: Areas / Issues of ConcernActions Pl
Page 85 and 86: Areas / issues of concernIssues req
Page 87 and 88: Domain 3 - Equality, Diversity and
Page 89 and 90: Domain 7 - Management of Education
Page 91 and 92: Visiting Team ReviewAfter the sessi
Page 95 and 96: Section 2: The VisitStrongly agreeA
Page 97 and 98:
Kent, Surrey & Sussex DeaneryQUALIT
Page 99 and 100:
Section 2: The VisitStrongly agreeA
Page 101 and 102:
Doc Ref: QMV-FOR-001Version 1.2Huma
Page 103 and 104:
QUALITY MANAGEMENT VISITOR DECLARAT
Page 105 and 106:
4. STFS VISITING TEAMSMinimum Requi
Page 107 and 108:
• Foundation training programme d
Page 109 and 110:
Next Scheduled meeting of QMSGConsi
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix ASouth Thames Foundation S
Page 113 and 114:
20. How would you rate the level of
Page 115 and 116:
AveragePoorNone36. GPs (if applicab
Page 117 and 118:
52. Do you have easy access to a ne
Page 119 and 120:
DOCUMENT CONTROLTitle:Originator:Ma
Page 121 and 122:
c) Do you have appropriate middle g
Page 123 and 124:
South Thames Foundation SchoolCHECK
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
South Thames Foundation SchoolFOUND
Page 131 and 132:
South Thames Foundation SchoolFOUND
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix 1Kent, Surrey & Sussex Dea
Page 135 and 136:
www.stfs.org.ukPage 3 of 2Updated:
Page 137 and 138:
consistently low trainee progressio
Page 139 and 140:
4. Visitor TrainingPotential future
Page 141 and 142:
In developmental and exception visi
Page 143 and 144:
The Visit Secretary will circulate
Page 145 and 146:
Kent, Surrey & Sussex DeaneryAction
Page 147 and 148:
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR GPSTRSThis proce
Page 149 and 150:
A full visiting team will consist o
Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX 1Specimen Questions Visito
Page 153 and 154:
APPENDIX 2Guidance for a GP Trainin
Page 155 and 156:
APPENDIX 3Roles and responsibilitie
Page 157 and 158:
APPENDIX 5Exception VisitsException
Page 159 and 160:
1.12 If the LEP has gained Earned A
Page 161 and 162:
3 Contract Review Visits3.1 The col
Page 163 and 164:
7 Bermondsey StreetLondonSE1 2DDMai
Page 165 and 166:
Education ContractPurposes and Scop
Page 167 and 168:
21. Schedule A - Pay and Non-PaySch
Page 169 and 170:
AppendicesSchedules of Funding: Sch
Page 171 and 172:
7 Bermondsey StreetLondonSE1 2DDMai
Page 173 and 174:
Glossary of TermsARCP Annual Review
Page 175 and 176:
3 Clinical responsibilityDomain 1.2
Page 177 and 178:
7 Intrepid: postgraduate doctor and
Page 179 and 180:
Domain 4: Recruitment, selection an
Page 181 and 182:
Domain 5: Provision of approved cur
Page 183 and 184:
28 Study leave availabilityDomain 5
Page 185 and 186:
d) Postgraduates should be allowed
Page 187 and 188:
40 Faculty development: Job PlansDo
Page 189 and 190:
Domain 7: Management of educationEd
Page 191 and 192:
51 Education technologiesDomain 8.1
Page 193 and 194:
58 Annual finance returnsDomain 8.1
Page 195 and 196:
Educational Governance:KSS Contract
Page 197 and 198:
CONTENTSGMCDomains
Page 199 and 200:
Results of Action Plan 2011The KSS
Page 201 and 202:
Cross-CurricularRolesNumbers Compli
Page 203 and 204:
Acute Care Common StemAnaestheticsE
Page 205 and 206:
posts)8 Education Centre Usage duri
Page 207 and 208:
Medical Education Manager is a full
Page 209 and 210:
In your narratives, you should tell
Page 211 and 212:
FinanceLong-termRecurrentShort-term
Page 213 and 214:
LAB Strategy Specification 2012Note
Page 215 and 216:
Leadership moved very rapidly from
Page 217 and 218:
form or work effectively. The 80/20
Page 219 and 220:
LABStrategic DevelopmentQuality Man
Page 221 and 222:
developing and utilising capacity t
Page 223 and 224:
Assistant Dean Education leading on
Page 225 and 226:
School Specific DevelopmentGeneral
Page 227 and 228:
Please provide targets in order to:
Page 229 and 230:
School of OpthalmologyLFG Establish
Page 231 and 232:
Library and Knowledge Services Deve
Page 233 and 234:
KSS Pharmacy Local Faculty Group An
Page 235 and 236:
Domain 2Monitoring, review and eval
Page 237 and 238:
Domain 5Curriculum delivery and stu
Page 239 and 240:
Domain 7 Support and development fo
Page 241 and 242:
Domain 10 OutcomesThere should be a
Page 243 and 244:
Appendix AKSS Collective Exit Repor
Page 245 and 246:
EventinvestigationIf not, please gi
Page 247 and 248:
LocationInfo on likely locationsinc
Page 249 and 250:
Domain 4: Recruitment, selection an
Page 251 and 252:
Domain 3: Equality, Diversity and O
Page 253 and 254:
57 Budgetary Accountability 58 Annu
Page 255 and 256:
1. Good Practice Examples:a. LKS:b.
Page 257 and 258:
KSScontractLEP ActionLOCAL ACADEMIC
Page 259 and 260:
KSScontract2012 Business Analysis12
Page 261 and 262:
Serious Incidents PolicyA Serious I
Page 263:
Serious Incident Preliminary Notifi
show all

Quality Manual - KSS Deanery

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?