12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Day 3: Core Ethical ConsiderationsPurposeOn Day 3, students deepen their understanding <strong>of</strong> the core ethical considerations and then apply theirunderstandings <strong>of</strong> the four key questions and the considerations to a new case. This gives them practice inmaking well-reasoned ethical arguments.Activity 6:Understanding the Ethical ConsiderationsEstimated Time: 30 minutesProcedureSee theIntroductionTo review tips for conducting anethical discussion, see Table 2 in theIntroduction, pages 16–19.1. Briefly review Carl’s case, which students read for homework.They should have answered the first three key questions on Master 1.7.Share with students that the next activity will build their understanding<strong>of</strong> the core ethical considerations <strong>of</strong> respect for persons, harms andbenefits, and fairness. They will then apply the ethical considerationsto Carl’s case and complete the remainder <strong>of</strong> Master 1.7 as a finalassessment.See Teacher Support MaterialsTo prepare for upcoming discussions, you could review thisresource now: Facilitating a Good Ethical Discussion <strong>of</strong> Carl’sCase—Sample Student-Teacher Dialogue, available online at http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/bioethics/teacher.Tip from the FieldIf students are at fixed desks, itmay be easier to give each groupfour regular pieces <strong>of</strong> paper andhave them pass the papers amongeach other.2. Make groups <strong>of</strong> four students each, and give each group fourmarkers and a large sheet <strong>of</strong> paper. Ask one member <strong>of</strong> each groupto use a marker to divide their sheet <strong>of</strong> paper into four quadrants.If possible, students should cluster around the paper, with one student in front <strong>of</strong> each quadrant. 3. Have each student in the group write one <strong>of</strong> the following termsat the top <strong>of</strong> each quadrant: respect, harms and benefits, fairness,and authenticity (being authentic). Share with students that each <strong>of</strong>these considerations is very important because each one is a differentway to honor the moral standing <strong>of</strong> persons.4. Instruct students to spend three to four minutes, workingsilently and independently, writing down examples <strong>of</strong> what theseconsiderations could look like. Students should ask themselves, Whatare examples that illustrate the considerations or their opposite? Eachstudent should write only in the quadrant in front <strong>of</strong> him or her.1-26 <strong>Exploring</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!