12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tell students that to move from their initial gut reactions to a more consideredopinion, it’s important to ask, What is the likely benefit to humans? What is thelikely nature and extent <strong>of</strong> harm to the animal? Is the ratio <strong>of</strong> animal harm tohuman benefit suffcient to make proceeding ethically acceptable?Tell them that two more important questions are, Is there any alternative to usinganimals in this way that would still bring the hoped-for human benefit? What arethe harms and benefits <strong>of</strong> the alternative?Point out that the immunoglobulin-cow case has an alternative approach thatwould be less harmful to the cows and ask, “Does the existence <strong>of</strong> that alternativemake anyone wish to change their recommendation?”Ask, “Should human benefits always trump animal harms?”Referring to the purebred-dog case or the dyed-feathers case, ask, “Do you believethat these manipulations for human purposes should always be acceptable? Whenmight they not be acceptable?”Ask students to start thinking about the question, In cases where there are no, oronly slight, animal harms, is it always acceptable to make these modifications?Activity 6: <strong>Exploring</strong> Respect as an Ethical ConsiderationEstimated Time: 15 minutesTell students who are still concerned by cases that include small harms to animalsthat they may have made their decisions based on reasons other than harms andbenefits. They will discuss some <strong>of</strong> these other reasons next.Direct students to turn to Master 6.4 and ask them, “Did you put any <strong>of</strong> the casesinto the ‘Small’ Harm to Animals row? Which ones?”Ask a student who placed a red or yellow sticker next to the dyed-feathers case onthe class poster to explain why.Ask students, “Why is it ethically acceptable to treat some things, like pencils,solely as a means to human benefit, but it is not ethically acceptable to treat onehuman being solely as a means to benefit other human beings?”Emphasize that humans are not to be treated solely as means to an end, evenwhen the end involves significant benefits to many human beings.Explain that placing a green sticker next to a case indicates that it is acceptable totreat animals as a means to humans’ ends in that case.Ask students, “Do you believe that animals might also deserve respect and that peopleshould not always treat them as a mere means to human benefit? Why or why not?”Closure: Sum up the discussion, and ask students to name the two major ethicalconsiderations they have been taking into account today.Homework: Complete Round 2 on Master 6.3.Page 6-15, Step 8Page 6-15, Step 9Page 6-15, Step 10Page 6-16, Step 11Page 6-16, Step 12Page 6-16, Step 13Page 6-16, Step 1Page 6-17, Steps 2–3Page 6-17, Step 4Page 6-17, Step 5Page 6-17, Step 6Page 6-17, Step 7Page 6-17, Step 8Page 6-18Page 6-186-20 <strong>Exploring</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!