12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Direct students to turn to their responses on Master 6.4.3. Ask students, “Did you put any <strong>of</strong> the cases in the ‘Small’ Harm toAnimals row? Which ones?”The dyed-feathers case poses very little harm to the chicks and <strong>of</strong>fersvery low human benefit. Some students probably approved thismodification, and others may have objected to it.4. Ask a student who placed a red or yellow sticker next to the dyedfeatherscase on the poster to explain why he or she did that. Youcan address the question to the class if specific students do not wishto speak up.5. Ask students, “Why is it ethically acceptable to treat some things,like pencils, solely as a means to human benefit, but it is notethically acceptable to treat one human being solely as a means tobenefit other human beings?”6. If it does not come out in the discussion, explain that humans arenot to be treated solely as means to an end, even when the endinvolves significant benefits to many human beings.Not treating someone solely as a means to an end is one way peopleshow respect to each other. For example, even though a doctor couldsave five patients by killing just one person and transplanting all <strong>of</strong>that person’s organs to the five people, that is not ethically acceptable.If a doctor cares for a patient to the best <strong>of</strong> her ability, she is treatingthe patient as both a means (to support herself and her family) and anend (to make the patient healthy), which is acceptable.7. Explain that placing a green sticker next to a case indicates thatit is acceptable to treat animals as a means to humans’ ends inthat case.8. Ask students, “Do you believe that animals might also deserverespect and that people should not always treat them as a meremeans to human benefit? Why or why not?”Respect for Animals: Not treating animals as merely useful forhuman purposes.You may wish to use the following questions to deepen and expandthe discussion:• What does deserving respect entail for an animal?• What are the limits to how scientists can modify animals for thebenefit <strong>of</strong> humans?• What should our responsibilities be toward animals?Module 6 6-17NoteBy emphasizing that some peoplewould find dyeing birds’ feathers objectionable,it is clear that somethingother than an assessment <strong>of</strong> harmsand benefits is influencing their decisionmaking. It is likely related to theconcept <strong>of</strong> respect. Initially, studentsmight not think <strong>of</strong> the term respectin relation to animals, but many willsense that it’s not right to manipulateanimals just to do it.123456

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!