12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Key <strong>Science</strong> Knowledge*• DNA, RNA, protein, traits• Ecosystem• Genetic-modification and gene-insertion methods• Implications <strong>of</strong> scientific interventions• Mutation• Phenotype, genotype• Population dynamics• Selective breeding, monoculture*Bold items are explicitly addressed in this module.Teaching Sequence PreviewDay 1—<strong>Exploring</strong> Modifications <strong>of</strong> the Natural World: As a group,students generate a list <strong>of</strong> human-made modifications to the naturalworld. They then read about the main case study <strong>of</strong> the module, involvinga genetically modified rabbit named Alba, and they react to the ethicalacceptability <strong>of</strong> the modification. To deepen their thinking about humanmodification <strong>of</strong> animals, students consider a range <strong>of</strong> cases that vary inthe extent <strong>of</strong> human benefit and animal harm the modifications are likelyto cause. As homework, students classify the modifications according todegree <strong>of</strong> human benefit and animal harm and decide whether or not—ormaybe—each <strong>of</strong> the potential modifications should be allowed.Day 2—Deepening Your Thinking: Some Key Ethical Considerations toTake into Account: Individual responses from the homework assignmentare aggregated so that class results are visible to everyone, which underscoresthat these are difficult judgments and that reasonable people candisagree. Students begin to think about two key ethical considerations: theratio <strong>of</strong> animal harm to human benefit—which includes the availability <strong>of</strong>a less harmful (to animals) alternative, if one exists, for gaining the humanbenefit—and the concept <strong>of</strong> respect. Students consider and discuss whether,in cases where the harms to animals are minimal or nonexistent, somepeople might still reasonably believe the modification was ethically unacceptablebecause it disrespects the animal. Students then have a chance tochange their responses and if they do, to reflect on why they did so.Day 3—Making a Recommendation: Selecting from a Range <strong>of</strong> PolicyOptions: Students return to the case introduced on Day 1. Now armedwith the ideas from Day 2, they must decide whether they think the modification<strong>of</strong> Alba the rabbit should proceed. They choose a recommendationfrom a range <strong>of</strong> possible policy options that fall along a decision-makingcontinuum: prohibition, temporary moratorium, incrementalism, restrictedpursuit, and no restrictions.6-4<strong>Exploring</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!