12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Issues Explored• Should there be limits on the extent to which humans modify the natural world?• Is the natural world important only because it is useful to human beings?At a GlancePurpose and RationaleOver thousands <strong>of</strong> years, human beings have been developing technologies thatmodify the natural world. Today, people can alter plants and animals in more pr<strong>of</strong>oundways than ever before. Current and future modifications will undoubtedlybring enormous benefits, but they will also carry risks and uncertainties. Citizenswill need to make decisions about the use <strong>of</strong> these modifying technologies. Suchdecisions should be grounded in an examination <strong>of</strong> humans’ place in the naturalworld and their responsibility to other life forms (also known as stewardship).This module, which focuses on human modifications to animals, could be usedin conjunction with units on DNA structure and function, biotechnology, evolution,genetics, ecology, food webs, and biodiversity. If used with another unit, therabbit case study from Day 1 could introduce that unit.OverviewIn this module, students address ethical questions related to modifying thenatural world. Although humans have been modifying their environment forthousands <strong>of</strong> years, modern technology has allowed people to modify animalsin new ways that help them meet their needs. Which, if any, <strong>of</strong> thesemodifications are ethically acceptable, and under what circumstances? Studentsconsider whether animals deserve respect, how to balance the harmsto the animal and the benefits to human beings, and the relevance <strong>of</strong> lessharmful alternatives to making the modifications.Students first examine the case <strong>of</strong> Alba, a rabbit that was genetically modifiedto be fluorescent, and, using the ethical consideration <strong>of</strong> minimizingharms while maximizing benefits, decide whether the modification is justifiable.Students then apply their understandings from the Alba case to othercases <strong>of</strong> genetic modification <strong>of</strong> animals, weigh the harms and benefits,and consider the nature and extent <strong>of</strong> respect animals deserve. In a finalassessment, students return to the Alba case and develop and justify policyrecommendations based on the relevant scientific information and on thetwo ethical considerations, respect and harms and benefits.6-2 <strong>Exploring</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!