12.07.2015 Views

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

Exploring Bioethics - NIH Office of Science Education - National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Have students, in pairs, quickly discuss where they placed theirstickers and why.16. Bring students back together and engage them in afull-class discussion.Possible discussion questions include• What do you notice when looking at the three posters around the room?• Why do you think the ________ poster received so many votes?• Would you have voted differently if a positive result on the genetictest—that is, having the mutation—only signaled an increased riskfor the thyroid cancer but not 100-percent certainty?• Would you have voted differently if medicine could <strong>of</strong>fer nothing toMax if he had the mutation?• Looking at the ________ poster (with so many votes), what argumentsmight people make against this person having so much power?See Teacher Support MaterialsIf the discussion becomes too one-sided, elicit counter opinionsusing tips from Who Should Decide Whether Max Gets Tested?available online at http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/bioethics/teacher. This resource provides possible probing questions to help students clarify,deepen, and challenge their thinking.NoteYou may want to refer studentsback to the Alzheimer’s diseasecase, where there are no treatmentsor cures and a positive test resultdid not mean a 100-percent chance<strong>of</strong> getting the disease.NoteThe fifth question is meant to helpstudents begin thinking aboutcounterarguments.See theIntroductionFor more discussion tips, seeTable 2 in the Introduction,pages 16–19.23Activity 8:Who Should Have Access to the Results?Estimated Time: 15–20 minutesIn this activity, students consider who should be able to access the results <strong>of</strong> agenetic test. Emphasize that shared knowledge isn’t necessarily public knowledge.In other words, if genetic information is shared with another person,that person would typically be expected to keep the information confidential.4Procedure1. Tell students that they will continue to look at the ethicalconsideration <strong>of</strong> respect for persons, but now will examine thisconsideration within the context <strong>of</strong> confidentiality. To whatextent should Max’s request that the information not be sharedwith other family members be honored?2. Ask students, “Should Max’s father be able to distribute—withoutMax’s permission—Max’s genetic information to differentmembers <strong>of</strong> the family?” Here, remind students <strong>of</strong> the need tobalance these aspects: Max’s request for confidentiality, whether otherfamily members would want this additional information, and theModule 4 4-2756

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!