Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Nitrogen fertilization management for seed production of tall fescueMarie-Laure CasalsFrench seed growers association (F.N.A.M.S.)Impasse du Verger, 49800 Brain sur l‟AuthionE-mail: marie-laure.casals@fnams.frAbstract:In France, rules relative to nitrates use (instruction n°91/676/CEE) prescribe 3 differentcompulsory instructions to farms located in sensitive areas: firstly calculation of N supply bymethod of nitrogen balance per crop, secondarily edition of a forecasting fertilization scheme,thirdly registration of quantities used and spraying dates in respect to forbidden periods.For grass seed production, and especially tall fescue, number of analyses of many experimentscarried out by FNAMS, in different areas and years have led to define for the first time the exactN needs for the crop (first trials serial between 1986 and 1994). Then, a good ratio was foundbetween N level uptake and seed yield: 160 kg N uptake /ha (at full ear emergence, from aerialpart and root system) is necessary to obtain the maximum seed yield. A N balance method habeen described for the N fertilization management of this grass specie.Following then, different experiments confirmed the validity of this N balance method. In 2007and 2008, trials have been carried out in different areas of France: south west, centre and northeast. In those areas several fields had been selected and three treatments have been compared: T1without nitrogen (to estimate N soil contribution), T2 calculated with N balance method and T3based upon the usual farmer practice. For the majority of experiments, the T2 modalities led toreduce the N supply of approximately 10 kg N/ha without any significant difference on seedyield, but varied from 40 kg N/ha to -15 kg N/ha. On the contrary, reduction of N supply (someT3 modalities, compared to T2 - N balance method), decreased significantly seed yield.These experiments also focussed similar N needs between two different fescue types: turf type(variety TOMAHAWK) and forage type (variety DULCIA), and also between first or secondyear of production. These results demonstrate that a more extensive use of N balance methodcould improve N fertilization management in these crops, and reduce luxurious N intake.Key words: grass seed production, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), N fertilizationIntroduction:In France, tall fescue is cultivated on small areas, on various latitudes like North-east, West andSouth-west which are submitted to various conditions of soils and climates.Before 2003, N fertilization was essentially empiric, based upon visual observations or based onother crops like cereal.75
In 2010, France has launched the forth procedure referring the nitrate policies (CEE n°91/676 ofthe 12 December 1991).The program covering 2009-2012, restrict the use of N in view to respectenvironment by elimination of the most dangerous practices.Considering the new context, seed growers located in vulnerable areas are constraint to adjust Nfertilization with possibility to refer to three methods. In seed production, only balance methodcan be used to determine the quantity of N needed for seed crop. FNAMS researches haveestablished the N needs for tall fescue to reach the maximum yield. This quantity can be used inthe balance method to calculate the spring N supply.Material and methods:Field experiments were carried out on tall fescue from 1986 to 2003 in four locations in France:Angers (north-west), Troyes (north-east), Lavaur and Condom (south-west), Bourges (middle).On these 4 locations and for each year, four rates of spring nitrogen application were compared:0, 60, 120 and 180 kg N ha -1 . Different cultivars were used: Clarine, Barcel, Bariane (foragetype) and Apache, Sinfonia,Villageoise (turf type). Each trial is conducted on autumn sowing(august), with 4 replications per object and harvested with an experimental combiner to obtainseed production data after drying and cleaning. In each experiment, a plants sample is clipped atthe end of ear emergence, dried (80°C during 24 h), weighted (t ha -1) and analysed for N content(Dumas method by flash combustion with automatic N analyser). At least N uptake is calculated(kg ha -1 ). A total of 158 dataset has been compiled to define the optimum N uptake to achievethe highest seed yield.In 2007 and 2008, 17 experiments were carried out on different areas of France. The Nfertilization levels varied in each trial. Three treatments are compared (table 1): T1- a controlplot without nitrogen (N=0), T2 – N supply calculated with the N balance method and T3 - basedupon the usual farmer practice. In all experiments, at ear emergence, plants samples were cut.Methods to carry out trials and to calculate N uptake are the same than described before.Results and Discussion• Relationship between N uptake and seed yieldThe maximum seed yields obtained on different trials are very variable (from 800 to 2350 kg ha -1 ), so results are expressed in percentage of the maximum seed yield obtained in each trial. Thefigure 1 shows the relationship between N uptake at the end of ear emergence and the seed yieldfor all trials. The response curve can be divided in three parts: (1) until 110 kg ha -1 of uptakennitrogen, yields increase rapidly in all trials, (2) between 110 and 130 kg ha-1, most themaximum seed yields are obtained, (3) above 130 kg ha-1, the increased of uptaken N has noeffect on yields.From the logistic curve Y = a / [1 + b × exp (-c × X)] (with Y = yield in % and X = nitrogenuptake in kg ha -1 ), we can consider that the optimum amount of N uptake in aerial part at ear76
- Page 35 and 36: Simple correlation and regression a
- Page 37 and 38: Variation in seed shattering in a g
- Page 39 and 40: Seed retention (SR) was calculated
- Page 41 and 42: mm160120Precipitation8040020Km h -1
- Page 43 and 44: Young, B. A. (1986). A Source of Re
- Page 45 and 46: Several methods are commonly used f
- Page 47 and 48: Table 3. Effect of the length of ha
- Page 49 and 50: Alfalfa seed production in semi-hum
- Page 51 and 52: Rather near the meteorological stat
- Page 53 and 54: ReferencesBolaños-Aguilar E.D., Hu
- Page 55 and 56: ased bioenergy conversion plants wa
- Page 57 and 58: Table 1. Average distances required
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 1. Optimized locations for 1
- Page 61 and 62: Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne
- Page 63 and 64: Relative Seed Yieldsingle composite
- Page 65 and 66: Flowers, M.D.; Hart, J.M.; Young II
- Page 67 and 68: Thus, similar to tissue tests, remo
- Page 69 and 70: Conclusion:Perhaps our most importa
- Page 71 and 72: Modelling critical NDVI curves in p
- Page 73 and 74: The five spectral reflectance measu
- Page 75 and 76: Harvest loss in ryegrass seed crops
- Page 77 and 78: Larger than expected harvest losses
- Page 79 and 80: Rolston, P.; Trethewey, J.; McCloy,
- Page 81 and 82: Optical sensors have the potential
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 2. Seed yield response to ap
- Page 85: Flowers, M. D., Hart, J.M., Young I
- Page 89 and 90: Yield (% maximum)ConclusionThe resu
- Page 91 and 92: Plant N uptakeN unavailableSoil nit
- Page 93 and 94: Stresses associated with germinatio
- Page 95 and 96: correspond to electrical conductivi
- Page 97 and 98: applied later in the fall was more
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 2. Establishment of five ove
- Page 101 and 102: The seed vigour testing was perform
- Page 103 and 104: Table 1. Germination index (GI) for
- Page 105 and 106: Reliability of salinity screening L
- Page 107 and 108: AcknowledgmentThis research was sup
- Page 109 and 110: Table 2. Greenhouse salinity screen
- Page 111 and 112: The seeds were collected from the A
- Page 113 and 114: increases germination to its potent
- Page 115 and 116: Light, lodging and flag leaves-what
- Page 117 and 118: Relative seed yieldSeed yield (kg/h
- Page 119 and 120: Hampton, J.G.; Clemence, T.G.A.; He
- Page 121 and 122: The seed set is of major importance
- Page 123 and 124: In grass species with poor seed ret
- Page 125 and 126: support system to optimize fungicid
- Page 127 and 128: weather stations in grass seed fiel
- Page 129 and 130: ust resistance loci in Lolium peren
- Page 131 and 132: Seed yield variation in a red clove
- Page 133 and 134: 100Seed yield plant -1 (g)806040200
- Page 135 and 136: Marden, J. H. 1984. Remote percepti
In <strong>2010</strong>, France has launched the forth procedure referring the nitrate policies (CEE n°91/676 ofthe 12 December 1991).The program covering 2009-2012, restrict the use of N in view to respectenvironment by elimination of the most dangerous practices.Considering the new context, seed growers located in vulnerable areas are constraint to adjust Nfertilization with possibility to refer to three methods. In seed production, only balance methodcan be used to determine the quantity of N needed for seed crop. FNAMS researches haveestablished the N needs for tall fescue to reach the maximum yield. This quantity can be used inthe balance method to calculate the spring N supply.Material and methods:Field experiments were carried out on tall fescue from 1986 to 2003 in four locations in France:Angers (north-west), Troyes (north-east), Lavaur and Condom (south-west), Bourges (middle).On these 4 locations and for each year, four rates of spring nitrogen application were compared:0, 60, 120 and 180 kg N ha -1 . Different cultivars were used: Clarine, Barcel, Bariane (foragetype) and Apache, Sinfonia,Villageoise (turf type). Each trial is conducted on autumn sowing(august), with 4 replications per object and harvested with an experimental combiner to obtainseed production data after drying and cleaning. In each experiment, a plants sample is clipped atthe end of ear emergence, dried (80°C during 24 h), weighted (t ha -1) and analysed for N content(Dumas method by flash combustion with automatic N analyser). At least N uptake is calculated(kg ha -1 ). A total of 158 dataset has been compiled to define the optimum N uptake to achievethe highest seed yield.In 2007 and 2008, 17 experiments were carried out on different areas of France. The Nfertilization levels varied in each trial. Three treatments are compared (table 1): T1- a controlplot without nitrogen (N=0), T2 – N supply calculated with the N balance method and T3 - basedupon the usual farmer practice. In all experiments, at ear emergence, plants samples were cut.Methods to carry out trials and to calculate N uptake are the same than described before.Results and Discussion• Relationship between N uptake and seed yieldThe maximum seed yields obtained on different trials are very variable (from 800 to 2350 kg ha -1 ), so results are expressed in percentage of the maximum seed yield obtained in each trial. Thefigure 1 shows the relationship between N uptake at the end of ear emergence and the seed yieldfor all trials. The response curve can be divided in three parts: (1) until 110 kg ha -1 of uptakennitrogen, yields increase rapidly in all trials, (2) between 110 and 130 kg ha-1, most themaximum seed yields are obtained, (3) above 130 kg ha-1, the increased of uptaken N has noeffect on yields.From the logistic curve Y = a / [1 + b × exp (-c × X)] (with Y = yield in % and X = nitrogenuptake in kg ha -1 ), we can consider that the optimum amount of N uptake in aerial part at ear76