Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Harvest methods and seed yield potential in Brachiaria hybridsE. A. Pizarro 1 , M. Hare 2 , J. H. Antezana Rojas 3 , R. R. Ramón 1 , I. G. Miranda 1 , A. Chávez Chena 1 , A.Balbuena 1 , and J. W. Miles 41 Grupo Papalotla, 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand, 3 SEFO - SAM,Bolivia, 4 Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, ColombiaE-mail: eapizarro@gmail.comAbstractUntil 2000, Brachiaria spp. cultivars were derived without genetic modification directly fromnatural germplasm collected in Africa. A breeding program was initiated at CIAT in 1988. Trialsdemonstrated the superiority of Mulato II, a vigorous, semi-erect grass with very deep andbranched roots giving it excellent drought resistance. Mulato II has excellent nutritional value:CP is in the range of 14 to 22% and IVDMD from 55 to 65%. These values, similar to temperategrasses, are unusual in warm-season grasses. Seeds yields are encouraging and are related withmanagement, harvest methods, and geographical locations.IntroductionUntil 2000, Brachiaria spp. cultivars were derived without genetic modification directly fromnatural germplasm collected in Africa.A breeding program, based on sexual germplasm kindly provided by C.B. do Valle (EMBRAPA-CNPGC), was initiated at CIAT in 1988, to combine desirable attributes found in accessions ofB. brizantha and B. decumbens. (Miles et al., 2004).Since the release of cv. Mulato II, a series of agronomic experiments have been conducted.Trials, demonstrated the superiority of Mulato II, a vigorous, semi-erect grass with very deep andbranched roots giving it excellent drought resistance, confirmed by results in the BrazilianCerrado, Central America, Mexico, Asia, as well as in the Argentine Chaco (Pizarro et al., 2008).Mulato II is the most innovative alternative to improve ruminant livestock productivity in thetropics (Pizarro et al., 2008).Mulato II has the potential to produce in excess of 500 kg ha -1 of pure seed, as evidenced byexperiments where an effort is made to recover all pure seed produced, either by bagginginflorescences or by opportune recovery of fallen seed (Hare et al., 2007c; Chávez Chena et al.,Personal communication). How much of this potential is realized in practice will depend onmany factors, including harvest method.Choosing an appropriate method for seed harvest depends firstly on the particular species,especially its growth habit and seed structure, the synchrony of crop development and relativeamounts of standing and fallen seed. Secondly, it depends on the availability of machinery orhand labor and finally, on previous experience.33
Several methods are commonly used for harvesting forage grass seed. For the genus Brachiariaboth manual and mechanized harvest has been employed. Mechanized harvest is further dividedinto direct heading and recovery of fallen seed.Seed harvesting procedures used in Brachiaria hybrids: Manual harvestingThailand: (Field trials were conducted in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand (15 o N Lat., 130masl, AAR 1538 mm).Effect of time of planting on seed production of Mulato II (Hare et. al., 2007a)Seven tiller planting dates were compared in a five replicate, randomized complete block fieldtrial. Tillers with roots were divided from 1-yr-old Mulato II plants.Table 1. Effect of time of planting Mulato II on seed yields and seed yield componentsTime ofplantingInflorescencesm 2RacemesinflorescenceSpikeletsracemeSeed yieldkg ha -1May 16 163 4.7 35.0 138June 1 138 5.2 34.6 109June 16 122 5.3 34.0 80July 1 104 5.0 32.7 54July 15 59 2.8 25.5 20August 1 23 2.7 21.9 6August 16 - - -LSD(P
- Page 1 and 2: Proceedings of the 7th Internationa
- Page 3 and 4: Table of ContentsORAL PRESENTATIONS
- Page 5 and 6: Seed yield components and yield per
- Page 7 and 8: International Herbage Seed Conferen
- Page 9 and 10: 16:15 - 16:30 Reliability of salini
- Page 11 and 12: Hotel expense is covered for night
- Page 13 and 14: 40,000 were slaves (McDonald, 2007)
- Page 15 and 16: Fig. 1. Texas AgriLife Research and
- Page 17 and 18: $7 billion for cattle, $3 billion f
- Page 19 and 20: principle and encourages both AgriL
- Page 21 and 22: eceived by growers, the above perce
- Page 23 and 24: seed conditioning plants are locate
- Page 25 and 26: Table 4.Hectares of open-field burn
- Page 27 and 28: system, a seed crop is produced fro
- Page 29 and 30: Fig. 1. Land resource areas of Texa
- Page 31 and 32: y land owners. Seed yields are low
- Page 33 and 34: The influence of planting density o
- Page 35 and 36: Simple correlation and regression a
- Page 37 and 38: Variation in seed shattering in a g
- Page 39 and 40: Seed retention (SR) was calculated
- Page 41 and 42: mm160120Precipitation8040020Km h -1
- Page 43: Young, B. A. (1986). A Source of Re
- Page 47 and 48: Table 3. Effect of the length of ha
- Page 49 and 50: Alfalfa seed production in semi-hum
- Page 51 and 52: Rather near the meteorological stat
- Page 53 and 54: ReferencesBolaños-Aguilar E.D., Hu
- Page 55 and 56: ased bioenergy conversion plants wa
- Page 57 and 58: Table 1. Average distances required
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 1. Optimized locations for 1
- Page 61 and 62: Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne
- Page 63 and 64: Relative Seed Yieldsingle composite
- Page 65 and 66: Flowers, M.D.; Hart, J.M.; Young II
- Page 67 and 68: Thus, similar to tissue tests, remo
- Page 69 and 70: Conclusion:Perhaps our most importa
- Page 71 and 72: Modelling critical NDVI curves in p
- Page 73 and 74: The five spectral reflectance measu
- Page 75 and 76: Harvest loss in ryegrass seed crops
- Page 77 and 78: Larger than expected harvest losses
- Page 79 and 80: Rolston, P.; Trethewey, J.; McCloy,
- Page 81 and 82: Optical sensors have the potential
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 2. Seed yield response to ap
- Page 85 and 86: Flowers, M. D., Hart, J.M., Young I
- Page 87 and 88: In 2010, France has launched the fo
- Page 89 and 90: Yield (% maximum)ConclusionThe resu
- Page 91 and 92: Plant N uptakeN unavailableSoil nit
- Page 93 and 94: Stresses associated with germinatio
Harvest methods and seed yield potential in Brachiaria hybridsE. A. Pizarro 1 , M. Hare 2 , J. H. Antezana Rojas 3 , R. R. Ramón 1 , I. G. Miranda 1 , A. Chávez Chena 1 , A.Balbuena 1 , and J. W. Miles 41 Grupo Papalotla, 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Ubon Ratchathani University, Thailand, 3 SEFO - SAM,Bolivia, 4 Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, ColombiaE-mail: eapizarro@gmail.comAbstractUntil 2000, Brachiaria spp. cultivars were derived without genetic modification directly fromnatural germplasm collected in Africa. A breeding program was initiated at CIAT in 1988. Trialsdemonstrated the superiority of Mulato II, a vigorous, semi-erect grass with very deep andbranched roots giving it excellent drought resistance. Mulato II has excellent nutritional value:CP is in the range of 14 to 22% and IVDMD from 55 to 65%. These values, similar to temperategrasses, are unusual in warm-season grasses. <strong>Seed</strong>s yields are encouraging and are related withmanagement, harvest methods, and geographical locations.IntroductionUntil 2000, Brachiaria spp. cultivars were derived without genetic modification directly fromnatural germplasm collected in Africa.A breeding program, based on sexual germplasm kindly provided by C.B. do Valle (EMBRAPA-CNPGC), was initiated at CIAT in 1988, to combine desirable attributes found in accessions ofB. brizantha and B. decumbens. (Miles et al., 2004).Since the release of cv. Mulato II, a series of agronomic experiments have been conducted.Trials, demonstrated the superiority of Mulato II, a vigorous, semi-erect grass with very deep andbranched roots giving it excellent drought resistance, confirmed by results in the BrazilianCerrado, Central America, Mexico, Asia, as well as in the Argentine Chaco (Pizarro et al., 2008).Mulato II is the most innovative alternative to improve ruminant livestock productivity in thetropics (Pizarro et al., 2008).Mulato II has the potential to produce in excess of 500 kg ha -1 of pure seed, as evidenced byexperiments where an effort is made to recover all pure seed produced, either by bagginginflorescences or by opportune recovery of fallen seed (Hare et al., 2007c; Chávez Chena et al.,Personal communication). How much of this potential is realized in practice will depend onmany factors, including harvest method.Choosing an appropriate method for seed harvest depends firstly on the particular species,especially its growth habit and seed structure, the synchrony of crop development and relativeamounts of standing and fallen seed. Secondly, it depends on the availability of machinery orhand labor and finally, on previous experience.33