Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group

Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group

12.07.2015 Views

measurements. Plants were collected within 1m×1m from each plot to determine abovegroundbiomass, and plant materials was dried at 60℃ for 48 h, then weighed. Plants were harvestedwithin another 1m×1m from each plot to obtain the seed, air-dried and weighed.ResultsAboveground biomassAboveground biomass increased with increasing plant density, and it was significantly higher(P0.05)differences between 2007 and 2008 (Table 1). Harvest index of C. songorica were the highest(21.1% in 2007, 21.3% in 2008 and 15.9% in 2009, respectively) under 30 plants/m 2 treatmentwhile they were the lowest (6.1% in 2007, 12.2% in 2008 and 8.5% in 2009, respectly) under 5plants/m 2 treatment.Table 1 . Effect of plant density (plants/m 2 ) on seed yield (kg/hm 2 ) of C. songorica in threeyearsDensity 2007 Significance 2008 Significance 2009 Significanceyield Y T yield Y T yield Y T5 39.7 c e 188.5 a d 129.0 b f10 149.8 b d 316.6 a bc 166.5 b ef15 273.6 a c 333.1 a bc 189.2 b de20 340.9 a c 410.4 a b 214.7 b cd25 458.5 a b 488.2 a ab 293.2 b b30 631.5 a a 636.2 a ab 387.6 b a50 447.0 a b 410.2 a b 242.5 b cdY and T indicate significant level at 5% among years and density treatments, respectively.23

Simple correlation and regression analysis between seed yield and its componentsThe results showed that the most important yield component of C. songorica was the number offertile shoots/m 2 that was significantly (P

measurements. Plants were collected within 1m×1m from each plot to determine abovegroundbiomass, and plant materials was dried at 60℃ for 48 h, then weighed. Plants were harvestedwithin another 1m×1m from each plot to obtain the seed, air-dried and weighed.ResultsAboveground biomassAboveground biomass increased with increasing plant density, and it was significantly higher(P0.05)differences between 2007 and 2008 (Table 1). Harvest index of C. songorica were the highest(21.1% in 2007, 21.3% in 2008 and 15.9% in 2009, respectively) under 30 plants/m 2 treatmentwhile they were the lowest (6.1% in 2007, 12.2% in 2008 and 8.5% in 2009, respectly) under 5plants/m 2 treatment.Table 1 . Effect of plant density (plants/m 2 ) on seed yield (kg/hm 2 ) of C. songorica in threeyearsDensity 2007 Significance 2008 Significance 2009 Significanceyield Y T yield Y T yield Y T5 39.7 c e 188.5 a d 129.0 b f10 149.8 b d 316.6 a bc 166.5 b ef15 273.6 a c 333.1 a bc 189.2 b de20 340.9 a c 410.4 a b 214.7 b cd25 458.5 a b 488.2 a ab 293.2 b b30 631.5 a a 636.2 a ab 387.6 b a50 447.0 a b 410.2 a b 242.5 b cdY and T indicate significant level at 5% among years and density treatments, respectively.23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!