Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Gislum, RenéAarhus UniversityDept. of Genetics and BiotechnologyDenmarkrene.gislum@agrsci.dkGlaser, DennisMid Valley Farms, Inc.31915 Seven Mile LnTangent, TX 97389USAmartha@midvalleyfarms.comHart, JohnOregon State UniversityDept. of Crop and Soil Science3017 Ag Life Science BuildingCorvallis, OR 97331USAjohn.hart@oregonstate.eduHavstad, LarsBioforsk, The Norwegian Institute ofAgricultural and Environmental ResearchArable Crop DivisionReddalsveien 215N-4886 Grimstad, Norwaylars.havstad@bioforsk.noHu, XiaowenN. 768, Jiayuguan West RoadChengguan DistrictLanzhou Universityhuxw@lzu.edu.cnJensen, PeterAarhus University, Dep. Integrated PestManagementForsoegsvej 1DK-4200Slagelse, DenmarkPeterK.Jensen@agrsci.dkJohnson, GeorgeJohnston, BillWashington State UniversityP.O. Box 646420Pullman, WA 99164USAwjohnston@wsu.eduKaragic, DjuraInstitute of Field and Vegetable CropsForage Crops DepartmentMaksima Gorkog 3021000 Novi SadSerbiadjura@ifvcns.ns.ac.rsKelly, MurrayPGG Wrightson Seeds LtdKimihia Research StnP.O. Box 175Lincoln 7640, Christchurchmkelly@pggwrightsonseeds.co.nzKudsk, PerAarhus UniversityFlakkebjergSlagelse, Denmark 4200Per.Kudsk@agrsci.dkLoch, DonaldGeneGro Pty Ltd35 Hilltop CrescentAlexandra Hillslochd@bigpond.comMachac, RadekOSEVA PRO Ltd.,Grassland Research Station at ZubriHamerska 698Zubri, 75654Czech Republicmachac@oseva.cz245
Mao, PeishengForage Seed LabChina Agricultural UniversityNo 2, Yuanmingyuan West Road,Haidian DistBeijing 100193 P R Chinamaopeisheng@hotmail.comMathiassen, SolvejgDepartment of Integrated Pest ManagementAarhus UniversityFlakkebjergDK-4200Slagelse, Denmarksolvejg.mathiassen@agrsci.dkMccloy, BedeNZ ArableP.O. Box 16101Christchurch 8841, New Zealandnzarable@xtra.co.nzMellbye, MarkOregon State UniversityP.O. Box 765Albany, OR 97321USAmark.mellbye@orst.eduMonks, DaveLincoln University Seed Research CentreP.O. Box 84Lincoln 7647, New ZealandDave.Monks@lincoln.ac.nzMueller-Warrant, GeorgeUSDA3450 SW Campus WayCorvallis, OR 97330USAmuellerg@onid.orst.eduNelson, LloydTexas AgriLife ResearchP.O. Box 200Overton, TX 75684USAlr-nelson@tamu.eduNiskanen, MarkkuMTT Agrifood Research FinlandMTT Ylistaro, Alapaantie 104Ylistaromarkku.niskanen@mtt.fiOddershede, StigDLF-TrifoliumNoerre Vedbyvej 14840 Noerre Alslevso@dlf.dkPfender, BillUSDA-ARS3450 SW Campus WayCorvallis, OR 97331USApfender@onid.orst.eduPitman, WilliamLSU AgCenterHill Farm Research Station11959 Hwy 9Homer, LA 71040USAwpitman@agcenter.lsu.eduPizarro, EstebanGrupo Papalotla5850 Coral Ridge Dr., Ste #302Coral Springs, FL 33076USAeapizarro@gmail.com246
Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the 7th Internationa
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsORAL PRESENTATIONS
Page 5 and 6:
Seed yield components and yield per
Page 7 and 8:
International Herbage Seed Conferen
Page 9 and 10:
16:15 - 16:30 Reliability of salini
Page 11 and 12:
Hotel expense is covered for night
Page 13 and 14:
40,000 were slaves (McDonald, 2007)
Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 1. Texas AgriLife Research and
Page 17 and 18:
$7 billion for cattle, $3 billion f
Page 19 and 20:
principle and encourages both AgriL
Page 21 and 22:
eceived by growers, the above perce
Page 23 and 24:
seed conditioning plants are locate
Page 25 and 26:
Table 4.Hectares of open-field burn
Page 27 and 28:
system, a seed crop is produced fro
Page 29 and 30:
Fig. 1. Land resource areas of Texa
Page 31 and 32:
y land owners. Seed yields are low
Page 33 and 34:
The influence of planting density o
Page 35 and 36:
Simple correlation and regression a
Page 37 and 38:
Variation in seed shattering in a g
Page 39 and 40:
Seed retention (SR) was calculated
Page 41 and 42:
mm160120Precipitation8040020Km h -1
Page 43 and 44:
Young, B. A. (1986). A Source of Re
Page 45 and 46:
Several methods are commonly used f
Page 47 and 48:
Table 3. Effect of the length of ha
Page 49 and 50:
Alfalfa seed production in semi-hum
Page 51 and 52:
Rather near the meteorological stat
Page 53 and 54:
ReferencesBolaños-Aguilar E.D., Hu
Page 55 and 56:
ased bioenergy conversion plants wa
Page 57 and 58:
Table 1. Average distances required
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 1. Optimized locations for 1
Page 61 and 62:
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne
Page 63 and 64:
Relative Seed Yieldsingle composite
Page 65 and 66:
Flowers, M.D.; Hart, J.M.; Young II
Page 67 and 68:
Thus, similar to tissue tests, remo
Page 69 and 70:
Conclusion:Perhaps our most importa
Page 71 and 72:
Modelling critical NDVI curves in p
Page 73 and 74:
The five spectral reflectance measu
Page 75 and 76:
Harvest loss in ryegrass seed crops
Page 77 and 78:
Larger than expected harvest losses
Page 79 and 80:
Rolston, P.; Trethewey, J.; McCloy,
Page 81 and 82:
Optical sensors have the potential
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 2. Seed yield response to ap
Page 85 and 86:
Flowers, M. D., Hart, J.M., Young I
Page 87 and 88:
In 2010, France has launched the fo
Page 89 and 90:
Yield (% maximum)ConclusionThe resu
Page 91 and 92:
Plant N uptakeN unavailableSoil nit
Page 93 and 94:
Stresses associated with germinatio
Page 95 and 96:
correspond to electrical conductivi
Page 97 and 98:
applied later in the fall was more
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 2. Establishment of five ove
Page 101 and 102:
The seed vigour testing was perform
Page 103 and 104:
Table 1. Germination index (GI) for
Page 105 and 106:
Reliability of salinity screening L
Page 107 and 108:
AcknowledgmentThis research was sup
Page 109 and 110:
Table 2. Greenhouse salinity screen
Page 111 and 112:
The seeds were collected from the A
Page 113 and 114:
increases germination to its potent
Page 115 and 116:
Light, lodging and flag leaves-what
Page 117 and 118:
Relative seed yieldSeed yield (kg/h
Page 119 and 120:
Hampton, J.G.; Clemence, T.G.A.; He
Page 121 and 122:
The seed set is of major importance
Page 123 and 124:
In grass species with poor seed ret
Page 125 and 126:
support system to optimize fungicid
Page 127 and 128:
weather stations in grass seed fiel
Page 129 and 130:
ust resistance loci in Lolium peren
Page 131 and 132:
Seed yield variation in a red clove
Page 133 and 134:
100Seed yield plant -1 (g)806040200
Page 135 and 136:
Marden, J. H. 1984. Remote percepti
Page 137 and 138:
Crimson clover seed production in t
Page 139 and 140:
Piper, C.V. 1935. Forage plants and
Page 141 and 142:
deal of investigation into the caus
Page 143 and 144:
genes and subsequent ability to pro
Page 145 and 146:
Gatenby, W.A., S.C. Munday-Finch, A
Page 147 and 148:
Control of Vulpia myuros in red fes
Page 149 and 150:
The strip design provides an opport
Page 151 and 152:
The pot experiments did not reveale
Page 153 and 154:
CharacterWeed abundance1 A few plan
Page 155 and 156:
Jensen, P. K. (2010) Longevity of s
Page 157 and 158:
Effects of intraspecific competitio
Page 159 and 160:
flowering, Gangi accumulated a high
Page 161 and 162:
The seed yield of Gangi was, on ave
Page 163 and 164:
Seed yield components and yield per
Page 165 and 166:
ResultsVariation among populations
Page 167 and 168:
Table 2. Means of total seeds per p
Page 169 and 170:
Ryle, G. J. (1970). Partition of As
Page 171 and 172:
Control of Apion trifolii in red cl
Page 173 and 174:
Number of seeds /inflorescencesimil
Page 175 and 176:
population. However, in spite of th
Page 177 and 178:
Corvallis where they were debearded
Page 179 and 180:
Table 1. Effect of Palisade growth
Page 181 and 182:
Variations on potential and harvest
Page 183 and 184:
Determination of optimum desiccatio
Page 185 and 186:
Relative seed yield (%)Flowers/m225
Page 187 and 188:
Harvesting too soon after peak flow
Page 189 and 190:
Annual ryegrass seed production in
Page 191 and 192:
seed yield, kg/haExtractable Al, mg
Page 193 and 194:
ReferencesHaby, V.A. (1995). Soil m
Page 195 and 196:
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L
Page 197 and 198:
urn residue management (Fig. 1 and
Page 199 and 200:
Comparing herbicide selectivity in
Page 201 and 202:
Development of new tetraploid Chlor
Page 203 and 204:
Following 4 (or 5) cycles of select
Page 205 and 206: Loch, D.S., Rethman, N.F.G. & van N
Page 207 and 208: KBGcocksfootHykorLofatimothymeadowf
Page 209 and 210: Figure 2 Relative seed yield (%) se
Page 211 and 212: and GA 4 . In consequence this inac
Page 213 and 214: Table 1 The effect of trinexapac-et
Page 215 and 216: Silberstein, T.B., Young, W.C. III,
Page 217 and 218: inflorescece number and seed yield
Page 219 and 220: Germination of Lolium multiflorum g
Page 221 and 222: Effect of sowing density on seed yi
Page 223 and 224: y-products of this grass seed crop
Page 225 and 226: Table 2. Effect of PGR on seed yiel
Page 227 and 228: Further culm length measurements ga
Page 229 and 230: chlorophyllometer. Measurements wer
Page 231 and 232: Table 2. Photosynthesis rate of fla
Page 233 and 234: Organization of grass seed research
Page 235 and 236: Path Coefficient and Ridge Regressi
Page 237 and 238: through y4 (0.133). Increasing y 1
Page 239 and 240: Newell G.J., Lee B. (1981)Ridge reg
Page 241 and 242: Relative humidity, seed moisture co
Page 243 and 244: Ergovaline contents in grasses from
Page 245 and 246: 11.8 % (Central East) to 40.0% (Nor
Page 247 and 248: ReferencesBony, S. & Delatour, P. (
Page 249 and 250: Long-term Evaluation of Annual Ryeg
Page 251 and 252: seed yield. All systems of establis
Page 253 and 254: Preliminary results after four year
Page 255: Casals, Marie-LaureFNAMSImpasse du
Page 259 and 260: Vanasche, DavidVanasche Farm36130 N
show all

Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?