Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group Texas, USA 2010 - International Herbage Seed Group
Materials and MethodsBreeding StrategyMass selection was applied to seedling populations derived from „Callide‟ and „Samford‟ Rhodesgrass (2001-06) with the aim of improving both the level of salt tolerance and the agronomicattributes. Based on first generation performance, seedlings selected from „Callide‟ were dividedinto two breeding populations: one comprising leafy, early flowering (less daylength-sensitive)plants with a preference for fine-stemmed types; and the other based on leafy, late floweringplants, rejecting only the very coarse-stemmed types. Selection within the single „Samford‟population focused on leafy, late-flowering, finer-stemmed genotypes.In the first „Callide‟ generation, selection for salt tolerance related only to plant growth andsurvival under high salinity, and was followed by selection for improved agronomic characters.Selection for germination under saline conditions was then added, giving a three-stage selectionprocess for generations 2-4(-5) in „Callide‟ and for generations 1-4 in „Samford‟: (i) germinationunder saline conditions; (ii) growth and survival under saline conditions; and (iii) agronomicperformance under non-saline field conditions.Breeding Procedures2000 „Callide‟ seedlings were grown individually in a peat-vermiculite mix in 50 mm squaretubes. At early tillering, the lower one-third of the tube was immersed in a NaCl solution, and theconcentration progressively raised (0.2 M every 2-3 days) to 0.7 M NaCl, which was maintainedfor c. 2 months during which approximately 85-90% of the seedlings died. The surviving plantswere then established on a spaced-plant grid for field agronomic evaluation.Because salt tolerance for germination and salt tolerance for growth tend to be unrelated,screening for germination under saline conditions was applied to generations 2-4(5) in „Callide‟and generations 1-4 in „Samford‟. Preliminary trials showed that germination was progressivelydelayed (by osmotic effects) and then reduced as the level of salt increased, reaching virtually nilgermination by the 0.3 M NaCl level. At the start of each new generation, seed of the 3 breedingpopulations from the preceding generation was sown and lightly covered by sand in a “floodand-drain”hydroponic system with 0.2 M NaCl plus complete plant nutrients. Despite heavyseeding rates, low numbers of germinated seedlings were obtained due to the heavy selectionpressure exerted for salt tolerance. Following germination, the trays of young seedlings (up to c.1-2 cm tall) growing in sand were placed in salt solutions to c. 3 cm depth. Salt levels wereprogressively increased to 0.7 M NaCl, and the most visibly tolerant seedlings later transferred tothe field as spaced plants.Results and Discussion191
Following 4 (or 5) cycles of selection, 3 new synthetic Rhodes grass cultivars (each based on 10-13 elite plants selected from the final generation) were constituted as shown in Table 1. In eachcase, the selected single-plant clones were divided vegetatively and established as balancedpolycross breeder‟s blocks (each 500-1000 m 2 , with the component clones each contributingequally to the overall cultivar) for seed multiplication in isolation from all other Rhodes grassplants in north Queensland. The aim was to reduce the risk of genetic drift by taking only 2 ofgenerations of seed increase to produce commercial seed.Table 1. New synthetic Rhodes grass cultivars constituted following repeated mass selection.Cultivar No. of Origin No. of Agronomic selection criteriaclonesgenerationsSabre 10 Callide 5 Early flowering, dense, leafy growth habit; finestemsToro 13 Callide 4 Late flowering, dense, leafy growth habitMariner 12 Samford 4 Late flowering with a dense, leafy growth habit;fine stemsA growing trial to describe the new cultivars for Plant Breeder‟s Rights registration (Loch andZorin, 2009) showed that „Toro‟ and „Mariner‟ are later-flowering and „Sabre‟ earlier-floweringthan „Callide‟ and „Samford‟. Probably because of selection against extremely prostrategenotypes, „Sabre‟ and „Toro‟ spread laterally a little slower than „Callide‟ and on average aremore erect in habit. They produce stolons with shorter, thinner internodes and more branches atthe nodes, and thinner culms than „Callide‟. „Sabre‟ produces slightly shorter culms with fewernodes and longer leaves than „Callide‟ and „Toro‟, and does not exsert its inflorescences as farabove the leaf canopy as the latter two cultivars. Stems of „Mariner‟ are thicker than for„Samford‟ (reflecting the removal of the finer-stemmed early-flowering genotypes throughselection) and comparable to „Sabre‟ and „Toro‟. The last 2 cultivars produce smallerinflorescences with fewer raceme branches and („Toro‟ only) shorter racemes than „Callide‟.„Mariner‟ produces larger inflorescences with longer racemes than „Samford, comparable inoverall size to „Sabre‟, but with more (though shorter) racemes.Additional work is on-going to document the levels of salt tolerance achieved through selectionin the 3 new cultivars, both under controlled glasshouse and laboratory conditions and in thefield. In this respect, the gains in salt tolerance reported by Malkin and Waisel (1986) from 5generations of mass selection from „Pioneer‟ Rhodes grass are encouraging.Plants vary in salinity tolerance at different developmental stages. However, available evidencefrom other species (e.g. Mano and Takeda, 1997) suggests that plants tolerant of salt duringgermination may not necessarily show a comparable level of tolerance during growth (and viceversa), hence the two-stage selection process for salt tolerance applied from the second „Callide‟192
- Page 151 and 152: The pot experiments did not reveale
- Page 153 and 154: CharacterWeed abundance1 A few plan
- Page 155 and 156: Jensen, P. K. (2010) Longevity of s
- Page 157 and 158: Effects of intraspecific competitio
- Page 159 and 160: flowering, Gangi accumulated a high
- Page 161 and 162: The seed yield of Gangi was, on ave
- Page 163 and 164: Seed yield components and yield per
- Page 165 and 166: ResultsVariation among populations
- Page 167 and 168: Table 2. Means of total seeds per p
- Page 169 and 170: Ryle, G. J. (1970). Partition of As
- Page 171 and 172: Control of Apion trifolii in red cl
- Page 173 and 174: Number of seeds /inflorescencesimil
- Page 175 and 176: population. However, in spite of th
- Page 177 and 178: Corvallis where they were debearded
- Page 179 and 180: Table 1. Effect of Palisade growth
- Page 181 and 182: Variations on potential and harvest
- Page 183 and 184: Determination of optimum desiccatio
- Page 185 and 186: Relative seed yield (%)Flowers/m225
- Page 187 and 188: Harvesting too soon after peak flow
- Page 189 and 190: Annual ryegrass seed production in
- Page 191 and 192: seed yield, kg/haExtractable Al, mg
- Page 193 and 194: ReferencesHaby, V.A. (1995). Soil m
- Page 195 and 196: Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L
- Page 197 and 198: urn residue management (Fig. 1 and
- Page 199 and 200: Comparing herbicide selectivity in
- Page 201: Development of new tetraploid Chlor
- Page 205 and 206: Loch, D.S., Rethman, N.F.G. & van N
- Page 207 and 208: KBGcocksfootHykorLofatimothymeadowf
- Page 209 and 210: Figure 2 Relative seed yield (%) se
- Page 211 and 212: and GA 4 . In consequence this inac
- Page 213 and 214: Table 1 The effect of trinexapac-et
- Page 215 and 216: Silberstein, T.B., Young, W.C. III,
- Page 217 and 218: inflorescece number and seed yield
- Page 219 and 220: Germination of Lolium multiflorum g
- Page 221 and 222: Effect of sowing density on seed yi
- Page 223 and 224: y-products of this grass seed crop
- Page 225 and 226: Table 2. Effect of PGR on seed yiel
- Page 227 and 228: Further culm length measurements ga
- Page 229 and 230: chlorophyllometer. Measurements wer
- Page 231 and 232: Table 2. Photosynthesis rate of fla
- Page 233 and 234: Organization of grass seed research
- Page 235 and 236: Path Coefficient and Ridge Regressi
- Page 237 and 238: through y4 (0.133). Increasing y 1
- Page 239 and 240: Newell G.J., Lee B. (1981)Ridge reg
- Page 241 and 242: Relative humidity, seed moisture co
- Page 243 and 244: Ergovaline contents in grasses from
- Page 245 and 246: 11.8 % (Central East) to 40.0% (Nor
- Page 247 and 248: ReferencesBony, S. & Delatour, P. (
- Page 249 and 250: Long-term Evaluation of Annual Ryeg
- Page 251 and 252: seed yield. All systems of establis
Materials and MethodsBreeding StrategyMass selection was applied to seedling populations derived from „Callide‟ and „Samford‟ Rhodesgrass (2001-06) with the aim of improving both the level of salt tolerance and the agronomicattributes. Based on first generation performance, seedlings selected from „Callide‟ were dividedinto two breeding populations: one comprising leafy, early flowering (less daylength-sensitive)plants with a preference for fine-stemmed types; and the other based on leafy, late floweringplants, rejecting only the very coarse-stemmed types. Selection within the single „Samford‟population focused on leafy, late-flowering, finer-stemmed genotypes.In the first „Callide‟ generation, selection for salt tolerance related only to plant growth andsurvival under high salinity, and was followed by selection for improved agronomic characters.Selection for germination under saline conditions was then added, giving a three-stage selectionprocess for generations 2-4(-5) in „Callide‟ and for generations 1-4 in „Samford‟: (i) germinationunder saline conditions; (ii) growth and survival under saline conditions; and (iii) agronomicperformance under non-saline field conditions.Breeding Procedures2000 „Callide‟ seedlings were grown individually in a peat-vermiculite mix in 50 mm squaretubes. At early tillering, the lower one-third of the tube was immersed in a NaCl solution, and theconcentration progressively raised (0.2 M every 2-3 days) to 0.7 M NaCl, which was maintainedfor c. 2 months during which approximately 85-90% of the seedlings died. The surviving plantswere then established on a spaced-plant grid for field agronomic evaluation.Because salt tolerance for germination and salt tolerance for growth tend to be unrelated,screening for germination under saline conditions was applied to generations 2-4(5) in „Callide‟and generations 1-4 in „Samford‟. Preliminary trials showed that germination was progressivelydelayed (by osmotic effects) and then reduced as the level of salt increased, reaching virtually nilgermination by the 0.3 M NaCl level. At the start of each new generation, seed of the 3 breedingpopulations from the preceding generation was sown and lightly covered by sand in a “floodand-drain”hydroponic system with 0.2 M NaCl plus complete plant nutrients. Despite heavyseeding rates, low numbers of germinated seedlings were obtained due to the heavy selectionpressure exerted for salt tolerance. Following germination, the trays of young seedlings (up to c.1-2 cm tall) growing in sand were placed in salt solutions to c. 3 cm depth. Salt levels wereprogressively increased to 0.7 M NaCl, and the most visibly tolerant seedlings later transferred tothe field as spaced plants.Results and Discussion191