An autobiography of your relationship with the Earth - Webpages at ...

An autobiography of your relationship with the Earth - Webpages at ... An autobiography of your relationship with the Earth - Webpages at ...

webpages.scu.edu
from webpages.scu.edu More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

An autobiography of your relationship with the EarthTo start a journey into environmental ethics, begin with what you know. One of the best waysto become aware of what you already know about environmental ethics is to write anautobiography of your relationship with the earth. Ethics is a matter of connecting head andheart. But too often ethical reasoning becomes detached from our experience, emotions,feelings, and deepest if unacknowledged commitments. By telling the story of the history ofyour relationship with the earth, you can better reflect on why we value the natural world aswe do. Many people describe their relationship with the Earth in spiritual or religious terms.Why might that be? Some people understand their relationship with the Earth as a source ofmeaning in their lives, and this might be spiritual, or it might not be. By reflecting on thesedeeper commitments of the heart, you can better refine our ethical reasoning about theenvironment.Step One:The great American environmentalist Aldo Leopold said in Sand County Almanac that "wecan be ethical only in relation to something that we can see, feel, understand, love, orotherwise have faith in." In light of Leopold's comment, we invite you in the course of writingthis autobiography to think of the earth in imaginative, personified terms. Has yourrelationship with the earth been a relationship with a friend or stranger? Or sometime friendand sometime stranger? Using Leopold's terminology, ask yourself the following questions.How do you "see" the earth? Is it beautiful or ugly or somewhere in between? What do you"feel" about the natural world? Do you feel joy or sorrow, pain or pleasure about animals orsunsets or white-capped waves? Do you "understand" the natural world and how itscomponents are related? Or are its ways foreign? Do you "love" the earth - or do you feel alienfrom it? Do you care for its well-being, feel for its suffering, want to heal its wounds? Or doesthinking about the earth in such terms seem inaccurate and far-fetched? And, to use the last ofLeopold's terms, do you have "faith" in the earth? Perhaps this is a religious faith? Or perhapsthis is faith in the sense that you count on the earth to provide well for your life? Or perhapsthe earth is faithless, a fickle friend at best? The first step in writing the autobiography of yourrelationship with the earth is to jot down responses to these questions.Step Two:The next step is an exercise in gathering additional information out of which to shape yourautobiography. In this step, you should jot down responses to the following questions:What is your most significant experience of nature? An experience undertaken in the course ofwork or recreation or other? Are there one or two experiences of an encounter with the naturalworld that stand out in memory? Close your eyes and remember the sights, smells, andfeelings of being in a place where you felt intimate with nature, and then write up notes thatexplain why that place on that day allowed you to relate to the Earth in a special way.

<strong>An</strong> <strong>autobiography</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong> <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>To start a journey into environmental ethics, begin <strong>with</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> you know. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best waysto become aware <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> you already know about environmental ethics is to write an<strong>autobiography</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong> <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth. Ethics is a m<strong>at</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> connecting head andheart. But too <strong>of</strong>ten ethical reasoning becomes detached from our experience, emotions,feelings, and deepest if unacknowledged commitments. By telling <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong><strong>your</strong> <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth, you can better reflect on why we value <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural world aswe do. Many people describe <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> in spiritual or religious terms.Why might th<strong>at</strong> be? Some people understand <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> as a source <strong>of</strong>meaning in <strong>the</strong>ir lives, and this might be spiritual, or it might not be. By reflecting on <strong>the</strong>sedeeper commitments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heart, you can better refine our ethical reasoning about <strong>the</strong>environment.Step One:The gre<strong>at</strong> American environmentalist Aldo Leopold said in Sand County Almanac th<strong>at</strong> "wecan be ethical only in rel<strong>at</strong>ion to something th<strong>at</strong> we can see, feel, understand, love, oro<strong>the</strong>rwise have faith in." In light <strong>of</strong> Leopold's comment, we invite you in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> writingthis <strong>autobiography</strong> to think <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth in imagin<strong>at</strong>ive, personified terms. Has <strong>your</strong><strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth been a <strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> a friend or stranger? Or sometime friendand sometime stranger? Using Leopold's terminology, ask <strong>your</strong>self <strong>the</strong> following questions.How do you "see" <strong>the</strong> earth? Is it beautiful or ugly or somewhere in between? Wh<strong>at</strong> do you"feel" about <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural world? Do you feel joy or sorrow, pain or pleasure about animals orsunsets or white-capped waves? Do you "understand" <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural world and how itscomponents are rel<strong>at</strong>ed? Or are its ways foreign? Do you "love" <strong>the</strong> earth - or do you feel alienfrom it? Do you care for its well-being, feel for its suffering, want to heal its wounds? Or doesthinking about <strong>the</strong> earth in such terms seem inaccur<strong>at</strong>e and far-fetched? <strong>An</strong>d, to use <strong>the</strong> last <strong>of</strong>Leopold's terms, do you have "faith" in <strong>the</strong> earth? Perhaps this is a religious faith? Or perhapsthis is faith in <strong>the</strong> sense th<strong>at</strong> you count on <strong>the</strong> earth to provide well for <strong>your</strong> life? Or perhaps<strong>the</strong> earth is faithless, a fickle friend <strong>at</strong> best? The first step in writing <strong>the</strong> <strong>autobiography</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong><strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ionship</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth is to jot down responses to <strong>the</strong>se questions.Step Two:The next step is an exercise in ga<strong>the</strong>ring additional inform<strong>at</strong>ion out <strong>of</strong> which to shape <strong>your</strong><strong>autobiography</strong>. In this step, you should jot down responses to <strong>the</strong> following questions:Wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>your</strong> most significant experience <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ure? <strong>An</strong> experience undertaken in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong>work or recre<strong>at</strong>ion or o<strong>the</strong>r? Are <strong>the</strong>re one or two experiences <strong>of</strong> an encounter <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>uralworld th<strong>at</strong> stand out in memory? Close <strong>your</strong> eyes and remember <strong>the</strong> sights, smells, andfeelings <strong>of</strong> being in a place where you felt intim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>with</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ure, and <strong>the</strong>n write up notes th<strong>at</strong>explain why th<strong>at</strong> place on th<strong>at</strong> day allowed you to rel<strong>at</strong>e to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> in a special way.


A grading rubric for reflection papersKeith Douglass Warner OFM<strong>An</strong> excellent paper will…1. provide a concise summary and insightful analysis <strong>of</strong> some key issues th<strong>at</strong> emerge from<strong>the</strong> readings, paying special especially <strong>the</strong> intersection between readings2. articul<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> implic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se issues as <strong>the</strong>y pertain to <strong>your</strong> life, including <strong>your</strong>beliefs, desires, practice, voc<strong>at</strong>ion3. drawing from <strong>your</strong> experience in critical analysis, describe <strong>your</strong> response to <strong>the</strong>seissues, and <strong>the</strong>ir implic<strong>at</strong>ions for <strong>your</strong> beliefs4. present <strong>the</strong>se in a coherent essay in which <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong> description and argument ispersuasive.5. use clear, vivid and gramm<strong>at</strong>ically correct language.A very good paper will1. demonstr<strong>at</strong>e engagement <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> readings and provide analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key issues th<strong>at</strong>emerge from <strong>the</strong>m2. describe how <strong>the</strong>se issues pertain to some aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong> life and beliefs3. describe <strong>your</strong> response to <strong>the</strong>se issues and <strong>the</strong>ir implic<strong>at</strong>ions for <strong>your</strong> beliefs4. present <strong>the</strong>se in an essay th<strong>at</strong> has flow and is persuasive5. use language th<strong>at</strong> is clear and gramm<strong>at</strong>ically correctA good paper will1. describe <strong>at</strong> least one key idea from <strong>the</strong> readings2. demonstr<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> this/<strong>the</strong>se idea(s) and <strong>your</strong> own beliefs3. describe <strong>the</strong> possible responses to this idea/<strong>the</strong>se ideas4. present <strong>the</strong>se in an essay th<strong>at</strong> uses gramm<strong>at</strong>ically correct language<strong>An</strong> acceptable paper will1. describe an idea from <strong>the</strong> readings and <strong>your</strong> response to this in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>your</strong> beliefs2. present <strong>the</strong>se in an essay th<strong>at</strong> uses gramm<strong>at</strong>ically correct languageWithout <strong>the</strong> elements described under “acceptable,” a paper will be unacceptable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!