Electronic absorption spectra Allowed vs forbidden transitions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Transitions in d 1 and d 2 complexesEd xz d xy d yzd x 2 -y 2 d z 2 d xz d xy d yzd x 2 -y 2 d z 2 d x 2 -y 21d xzd xyd yzd x 2 -y 2 d z 2 d x 2 -y 2d z 2d xz d xy d yz1d xy d x 2 -y 21d xz1d xz 1 d z 2 1 d yz 1 d z 2 1d xy 1 d z 2 1 d yz 1 d x 2 -y 21d xz d xy d yzd x 2 -y 2 d z 2d x 2 -y 2 d z 2d xz d xy d yzSome compounds are very highly coloredbecause of charge transfer transitions – evensome with no d electrons● There can be electronic transitions in the visible region that donot involved d-electrons− MnO 4- (purple) and CrO 42-(yellow) are intensely coloredbecause electrons in filled oxygen based orbitals areexcited into empty d-orbitals (LMCT)− Ligand to Metal Charge Transfer (LMCT) bands have fewselection rule restrictions and are typically very intense● Metal to Ligand Charge Transfer (MLCT) bands may also occurfor complexes with d-electrons.− There are few selection rules and the high intensity of thesebands may mask d-d transitions.
Crystal field splitting in tetrahedral complexes• Tetrahedral arrangement of four ligandsshowing their orientation relative to theCartesian axes and the d yzorbital.• The orientation with respect to d xz, d xzandd xyis identical and the interaction withthese orbitals is considerably greater thanwith the d z2and d x2-y2orbitals; thereforethe d yz, d xzand d xyorbitals are higher inenergy than d z2and d x2-y2.• Because there are only four ligands andthe ligand electron pairs do not pointdirectly at the orbitals, Δ t~4/9 Δ o. As aresult the spin-pairing energy is alwaysgreater than Δ and tetrahedral complexesare always high spin.Comparison of crystal field splittings foroctahedral, square planar and tetrahedralligand fields
Page 6: Factors affecting the magnitude of

Electronic absorption spectra Allowed vs forbidden transitions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?