Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ...
Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ... Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ...
How mental illness, learning disability, substance misuse anddomestic violence affect parenting capacity 83 Relationships within families can be disrupted. Mental illness, learningdisability, problem drinking and drug misuse are associated with maritalbreakdown. The association is complex. The parental disorder itself, orits consequences such as the loss of a job and reduced income, may strainfamily relationships. Alternatively, mental illness, excessive drinking or drugmisuse may be a consequence of an unhappy or violent relationship. Finally,all may have a common cause, such as childhood adversity.
3Which children are most at risk ofsignificant harm?Chapter 3 explores factors that increase children’s vulnerability and those that protectchildren from suffering significant harm. Vulnerability factors include:co-morbidity of parental problemsa cumulation of negative childhood experiences including abuse and neglectgenetic transmission of parental disordersinvolvement in parental delusionsexposure to illicit drugs and the paraphernalia of drug use.Protective factors include:quick resolution of parental problemsday-to-day presence of a caring, safe adult who parents the childthe child’s own temperament, coping strategies and resilience.What constitutes significant harm?The concept of significant harm was introduced by the Children Act 1989 as thethreshold for compulsory intervention in family life in the best interests of children.The Act places a duty on local authorities to make enquiries to decide whetherthey should take action to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child who issuffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm. Statutory guidance (HM Government2010a) discusses the issues that should be considered when judging what constitutessignificant harm in individual cases.There are no absolute criteria on which to rely when judging what constitutessignificant harm. Consideration of the severity of ill-treatment may include thedegree and the extent of physical harm, the duration and frequency of abuseand neglect, the extent of premeditation, and the presence or degree of threat,coercion, sadism and bizarre or unusual elements. Each of these elements has beenassociated with more severe effects on the child, and/or relatively greater difficultyin helping the child overcome the adverse impact of the maltreatment. Sometimes,a single traumatic event may constitute significant harm, for example, a violent
- Page 39 and 40: 32 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 41 and 42: 34 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 43 and 44: 36 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 45 and 46: 38 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 47 and 48: 40 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 49 and 50: 42 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 51 and 52: 44 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 53 and 54: 46 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 55 and 56: 48 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 57 and 58: 50 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 59 and 60: 52 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 61 and 62: 54 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 63 and 64: 56 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 65 and 66: 58 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 67 and 68: 60 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 69 and 70: 62 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 71 and 72: 64 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 73 and 74: 66 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 75 and 76: 68 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 77 and 78: 70 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 79 and 80: 72 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 81 and 82: 74 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 83 and 84: 76 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 85 and 86: 78 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 87 and 88: 80 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 89: 82 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 93 and 94: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 95 and 96: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 97 and 98: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 99 and 100: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 101 and 102: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 103 and 104: 4Child development and parents’re
- Page 105 and 106: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 107 and 108: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 109 and 110: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 111 and 112: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 113 and 114: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 115 and 116: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 117 and 118: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 119 and 120: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 121 and 122: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 123 and 124: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 125 and 126: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 127 and 128: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 129 and 130: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 131 and 132: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 133 and 134: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 135 and 136: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 137 and 138: Child development and parents’ re
- Page 139 and 140: Child development and parents’ re
3Which children are most at risk ofsignificant harm?Chapter 3 explores factors that increase children’s vulnerability and those that protectchildren from suffering significant harm. Vulnerability factors include:co-morbidity of parental problemsa cumulation of negative childhood experiences including abuse and neglectgenetic transmission of parental disordersinvolvement in parental delusionsexposure to illicit drugs and the paraphernalia of drug use.Protective factors include:quick resolution of parental problemsday-to-day presence of a caring, safe adult who parents the childthe child’s own temperament, coping strategies and resilience.What constitutes significant harm?The concept of significant harm was introduced by the Children Act 1989 as thethreshold for compulsory intervention in family life in the best interests of children.The Act places a duty on local authorities to make enquiries to decide whetherthey should take action to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child who issuffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm. Statutory guidance (HM Government2010a) discusses the issues that should be considered when judging what constitutessignificant harm in individual cases.There are no absolute criteria on which to rely when judging what constitutessignificant harm. Consideration of the severity of ill-treatment may include thedegree and the extent of physical harm, the duration and frequency of abuseand neglect, the extent of premeditation, and the presence or degree of threat,coercion, sadism and bizarre or unusual elements. Each of these elements has beenassociated with more severe effects on the child, and/or relatively greater difficultyin helping the child overcome the adverse impact of the maltreatment. Sometimes,a single traumatic event may constitute significant harm, for example, a violent