Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ...
Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ... Children's Needs â Parenting Capacity - Digital Education Resource ...
Is concern justified? Problems of definition and prevalence 45Mutual combat may be the norm in many violent households, but attacks bywomen tend only to be reported when the attacks are very dangerous or result inserious injury (Cook 1997; Fergusson et al. 2005). Research in Canada, the US,Australia and New Zealand suggests that violence between couples is relativelycommon and may be an intimate part of the relationship. For example, from aCanadian sample of women, recruited on the basis of being victims of husbandabuse, two-thirds admitted they also were perpetrators of violence to their husbands(Currie 2006). Similar findings were also reported in a US study of 258 children andtheir mothers, recruited from domestic-violence shelters; 61% of women who hadbeen subject to severe intimate-partner violence reported committing one or moresuch acts themselves in the previous year (McDonald et al. 2009).Intimate-partner violence exists also in same-sex relationships and US studiessuggest prevalence rates are similar to those among heterosexual couples (Covelland Howe 2009). There is little research covering the impact on children of mutualviolence or violence perpetrated by women. However, regardless of the gender ofthe perpetrator, witnessing adults hitting, pushing or shoving one another, evenif no injuries occur, is frightening and gives children the message that violence isacceptable behaviour.Prevalence of domestic violence: child protectionstudiesChild-focused research reveals strong links between child abuse and domesticviolence. Gibbons et al.’s (1995) study of all child protection referrals noted thatdomestic violence occurred in approximately a quarter (27%) of cases. Cleaver andWalker with Meadows’ study of 2,248 referrals to children’s social care found, onre-analysing their data, that domestic violence was recorded in only 4.8% of allreferrals; at the initial assessment stage social workers had recorded concerns aboutdomestic violence in 16.7% of cases (Cleaver and Walker with Meadows 2004).Qualitative research suggests that this may be an underestimation, Cleaver andFreeman (1995) found domestic violence in 40% of cases where child protectionconcerns had warranted a visit to the family.Thoburn et al. (1995) suggest a figure of 35% at the child protection conferencestage, but acknowledge that much violence may be hidden, ‘the amount of presentand past marital conflict is almost certainly underestimated’ (Thoburn et al. 1995,p.38). This claim is substantiated by Farmer and Owen (1995) who found a similarrate of reporting by social workers at the child protection conference stage, althoughsubsequent research interviews with families revealed the higher rate of 52%. Thisis in line with figures from the NSPCC (1997b), which estimated that domesticviolence was present in over half (55%) of child protection cases they had dealtwith.
46 Children’s Needs – Parenting CapacityThe level remains fairly constant when children are the subject of care proceedings.Hunt et al. (1999) found that domestic violence was an issue in 51% of cases comingto court. Finally, an analysis of serious case reviews found evidence of past or presentdomestic violence in over half (53%) of the living circumstances of the children(Brandon et al. 2009).Domestic violence and the type of child abuseThere is considerable evidence that ‘adult partners who are violent toward each otherare also at increased risk of abusing their children’ (Moffitt and Caspi 1998, p.137;Farmer and Pollock 1998; Hester et al 2007). Research suggests that men’s severeinterpersonal violence seldom occurs in isolation; women’s violence to their partner,partner-child aggression, and mother-child aggression are also common (McDonaldet al. 2009). Cavanagh and colleagues’ (2007) study of 26 cases of fatal child abuseperpetrated by fathers found that in three-quarters of cases the man had also beenviolent towards his partner (the child’s mother). The risk of child abuse is shown tobe between three and nine times greater in homes where the adult partners hit eachother (Moffitt and Caspi 1998). However, there is little agreement on the rates ofoverlap between domestic violence and child physical abuse: rates fluctuate betweenstudies and range from 45% to 70% (Holt et al. 2008).Additional evidence for a link between domestic violence and physical child abusecomes from feminist research. An American study of ‘wife beating’, using a voluntarysample of 1,000 women, found ‘wife beaters abused children in 70% of familieswhere children were present’ (Bowker et al. 1988, p.162). In contrast, the NationalChildren’s Home (NCH) Action for Children (1994) study of children living withdomestic violence found only 27% of children were reported by their mother as ‘hitor abused’. The large disparity between these findings may be deceptive. The authorssuggest the figure of 27% may under-represent the prevalence of physical childabuse because mothers are reluctant to disclose the abuse or are ignorant of it. Inanother study, less than half the mothers (44%) reported that their violent partners‘didn’t touch the children’ (NCH Action for Children 1994, p.31). Evidence is alsoemerging that identifies a link between mothers who have experienced domesticviolence and mother-child maltreatment. In a sample of 1,236 families enteringthe US child welfare system, almost half (44%) of the mothers who were reportedfor alleged child maltreatment had experienced physical violence by their partner(Casanueva et al. 2009).There is also some evidence to suggest a raised incidence of co-occurrence ofdomestic violence and child sexual abuse, although rates vary due to sampling. Forexample, in a community sample of 54 mothers who had experienced domesticviolence, 4% reported the sexual abuse of their child by their ex-partners (Smithet al. 1997). Humphreys and Stanley’s (2006) analysis of case files where there wasevidence of child sexual abuse, found the presence of domestic violence in over halfthe cases. Fathers and father figures were more likely to sexually abuse their child
- Page 1 and 2: Children’s Needs - Parenting Capa
- Page 3 and 4: Published for the Department for Ed
- Page 5 and 6: ivChildren’s Needs - Parenting Ca
- Page 7 and 8: List of figures and tablesFiguresFi
- Page 9 and 10: AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge with
- Page 11 and 12: 2 Children’s Needs - Parenting Ca
- Page 13 and 14: 4 Children’s Needs - Parenting Ca
- Page 15 and 16: 6 Children’s Needs - Parenting Ca
- Page 17 and 18: 8 Children’s Needs - Parenting Ca
- Page 19 and 20: 10 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 21 and 22: 12 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 23 and 24: 14 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 25 and 26: 16 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 27 and 28: 18 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 29 and 30: PART I: GENERAL ISSUESAFFECTING PAR
- Page 31 and 32: 24 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 33 and 34: 26 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 35 and 36: 28 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 37 and 38: 30 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 39 and 40: 32 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 41 and 42: 34 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 43 and 44: 36 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 45 and 46: 38 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 47 and 48: 40 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 49 and 50: 42 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 51: 44 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 55 and 56: 48 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 57 and 58: 50 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 59 and 60: 52 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 61 and 62: 54 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 63 and 64: 56 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 65 and 66: 58 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 67 and 68: 60 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 69 and 70: 62 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 71 and 72: 64 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 73 and 74: 66 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 75 and 76: 68 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 77 and 78: 70 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 79 and 80: 72 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 81 and 82: 74 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 83 and 84: 76 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 85 and 86: 78 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 87 and 88: 80 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 89 and 90: 82 Children’s Needs - Parenting C
- Page 91 and 92: 3Which children are most at risk of
- Page 93 and 94: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 95 and 96: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 97 and 98: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 99 and 100: Which children are most at risk of
- Page 101 and 102: Which children are most at risk of
Is concern justified? Problems of definition and prevalence 45Mutual combat may be the norm in many violent households, but attacks bywomen tend only to be reported when the attacks are very dangerous or result inserious injury (Cook 1997; Fergusson et al. 2005). Research in Canada, the US,Australia and New Zealand suggests that violence between couples is relativelycommon and may be an intimate part of the relationship. For example, from aCanadian sample of women, recruited on the basis of being victims of husbandabuse, two-thirds admitted they also were perpetrators of violence to their husbands(Currie 2006). Similar findings were also reported in a US study of 258 children andtheir mothers, recruited from domestic-violence shelters; 61% of women who hadbeen subject to severe intimate-partner violence reported committing one or moresuch acts themselves in the previous year (McDonald et al. 2009).Intimate-partner violence exists also in same-sex relationships and US studiessuggest prevalence rates are similar to those among heterosexual couples (Covelland Howe 2009). There is little research covering the impact on children of mutualviolence or violence perpetrated by women. However, regardless of the gender ofthe perpetrator, witnessing adults hitting, pushing or shoving one another, evenif no injuries occur, is frightening and gives children the message that violence isacceptable behaviour.Prevalence of domestic violence: child protectionstudiesChild-focused research reveals strong links between child abuse and domesticviolence. Gibbons et al.’s (1995) study of all child protection referrals noted thatdomestic violence occurred in approximately a quarter (27%) of cases. Cleaver andWalker with Meadows’ study of 2,248 referrals to children’s social care found, onre-analysing their data, that domestic violence was recorded in only 4.8% of allreferrals; at the initial assessment stage social workers had recorded concerns aboutdomestic violence in 16.7% of cases (Cleaver and Walker with Meadows 2004).Qualitative research suggests that this may be an underestimation, Cleaver andFreeman (1995) found domestic violence in 40% of cases where child protectionconcerns had warranted a visit to the family.Thoburn et al. (1995) suggest a figure of 35% at the child protection conferencestage, but acknowledge that much violence may be hidden, ‘the amount of presentand past marital conflict is almost certainly underestimated’ (Thoburn et al. 1995,p.38). This claim is substantiated by Farmer and Owen (1995) who found a similarrate of reporting by social workers at the child protection conference stage, althoughsubsequent research interviews with families revealed the higher rate of 52%. Thisis in line with figures from the NSPCC (1997b), which estimated that domesticviolence was present in over half (55%) of child protection cases they had dealtwith.