12.07.2015 Views

Justice William Charles Crockett AO - Victorian Bar

Justice William Charles Crockett AO - Victorian Bar

Justice William Charles Crockett AO - Victorian Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Judge Judith Cohen, <strong>Justice</strong> Rosemary Balmford and <strong>Justice</strong> Marcia Neave.although the majority of senior positionsin academia, the law and commerce andindustry are still occupied by men. Thisyear the enactment of the <strong>Victorian</strong>Charter of Rights and Responsibilitiesformally recognised the right to equalitybefore the law. The Equal OpportunityAct makes it unlawful to discriminatein areas such as education, employmentand the provision of goods and serviceson the grounds of gender, pregnancy andmarital status. The criminal law principleswhich treated women as unreliable witnessesin sex offence cases were repealedmany years ago. Recent reforms to sexualoffences laws based on recommendationsmade by the <strong>Victorian</strong> Law ReformCommission will make it less stressful forcomplainants in sexual offence cases togive evidence. 11 Violent men who kill theirpartners are no longer able to rely on thepartial excuse of provocation. 12 The highincidence and terrible human cost of familyviolence is better recognised and thereare now more remedies for women whoare assaulted by their partners.On the other hand there is still a substantialgap between the rhetoric and thereality of gender equality, both at the <strong>Bar</strong>and in the broader workforce. Comparedto many other women, barristers are awell educated and privileged group, butthe patterns of gender segmentationwhich exist in the general workforce areapparent at the <strong>Bar</strong>, where women areunder-represented in the senior ranks ofthe profession. While I do not have figureson the comparative earnings of male andfemale barristers, I think it is highly likelythat women barristers generally earn lessthan their brothers. Again this reproducesthe position of women in the broader community.Women barristers, like their sisters inother parts of the workforce, still find itdifficult to achieve a satisfactory balancebetween family and work responsibilities,particularly if they are single parents.In the general community women areover-represented among victims of familyviolence and sexual assault. Familyviolence is not a class-based phenomenonand I would be prepared to bet that thereare some women at the <strong>Bar</strong> who have hadto deal with this issue personally. Manyyears ago I participated in a seminar onfamily violence attended by a numberwomen who were senior members of thelegal profession. After the seminar I wastold by three women present that theyhad been the victims of violence earlierin their lives.The issues which women barristersconfront reflect the strategic dilemmasfaced by women in the whole community.Broadly the question we need to consideris “Where do we go from here”?At this point in history we may beapproaching the outer limits of the lawas an instrument for improving the livesof women.Areas where legislative reform is obviouslyneeded have been identified andlargely addressed. Apart from industrialrelations changes which make it easier forwomen to combine paid work and familyresponsibilities — which are not on thehorizon at the moment — I do not thinkthat legislative reform is likely to deliversignificant gains for women in the future.Procedural and administrative changescan also improve the position of women— particularly women from disadvantagedsections of the community. The changesto procedures in sex offence cases and theestablishment of specialist family violencecourts are recent examples. But again Ithink that such changes will have limitedcapacity to address the complex questionsof gender inequality which are likely toarise in the future.Common law changes have alsoimproved the position of women in thepast. Developments of constructivetrusts principles to enable women in defacto relationships to claim an interest inproperty owned by their partner are oneexample of doctrinal changes which havebenefited women. Another was the abandonmentof the common law principle thata man cannot rape his wife, which surviveduntil 1991. 13 Though courts are notlaw reform bodies, the changing compositionof the judiciary is likely to result inbetter understanding of how rules whichare apparently gender neutral may have adifferent impact on men and women.In the past women looked to lawreform to improve their position. I haveargued that legislative changes and commonlaw developments are now less likely65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!