Figure 2Investment Returns June 30, <strong>2009</strong>(<strong>Annual</strong>ized)<strong>2009</strong> 2008 2007 2006 2005 3 Yrs. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs.% % % % % % % %Total Fund (20.1) (6.2) 17.1 11.0 10.1 (4.3) 1.4 1.9Composite Benchmark* (17.0) (4.6) 16.4 11.5 10.9 (2.7) 2.7 2.7Consumer Price Index (1.4) 5.0 2.7 4.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 2.6U.S. Equities (22.0) (11.6) 19.9 10.7 9.3 (6.2) 0.0 0.2Russell 3000 Index (26.6) (12.5) 20.1 9.6 8.1 (8.4) (1.8) (1.5)International Equities (29.1) (10.3) 28.8 28.9 14.8 (6.4) 3.9 2.4MSCI-EAFE Index (31.0) (10.2) 27.5 27.1 14.1 7.5 2.8 1.6Fixed Income (2.4) 5.3 6.9 0.8 6.9 3.3 3.5 4.5Barclay’s Capital U.S.Universal Index 4.9 6.2 6.6 (0.3) 7.4 5.9 5.0 6.0Real Estate (31.7) 2.6 15.3 19.5 14.8 (6.9) 2.1 4.4NCRIEF Real Estate Index (19.6) 9.2 17.2 18.7 15.6 1.0 7.6 8.5Private Equity (18.8) (4.9) 31.7 21.3 29.6 0.6 9.9 7.3* Composite Benchmark:Effective 11/08:Effective 04/08:Effective 12/03:Effective 4/02:Prior to 4/02:30% Russell 3000; 20% MSCI-EAFE; 25% Barclays U.S. Capital Universal; 10% NCRIEF;5% Venture Economic all Private Equity Index; 10% HFR Equity Hedged Index.30% Russell 3000; 20% MSCI-EAFE; 25% Lehman Universal; 10% NCRIEF;5% Venture Economic all Private Equity Index; 10% HFR Equity Hedged Index.45% Wilshire 5000; 10% MSCI-EAFE; 25% Lehman Universal; 10% NCRIEF;5% Venture Economic all Private Equity Index; 5% HFR Equity Hedged Index.46% Russell 3000; 15% MS-AC Free ex US; 23% Lehman Universal;8% NCRIEF; 8% Russell 2000 + 3.0%.43% Russell 3000; 20% MS-AC Free ex US; 22% Lehman Aggregate;7% NCRIEF; 8% absolute return <strong>of</strong> 12%.International EquitiesThe Morgan Stanley EAFE Index returned negative 31.0% forthe fiscal year ended June 30, <strong>2009</strong>, or 4.4% below the U.S.return. ISBI’s International equity portfolio was down 29.1%,1.9% above the EAFE Index. As with the U.S. equity portfolio,the Board has the twin objectives <strong>of</strong> limiting tracking errorrelative to the benchmark and adding value with activemanagement. The returns for longer time periods are shown inFigure 2.Fixed IncomeThe ISBI Fixed Income portfolio had a negative return <strong>of</strong> 2.4%for the fiscal year ended June 30, <strong>2009</strong>, compared to thepositive 4.9% for the Barclay’s Universal Bond Index. Anunderweighting to Government bonds coupled with anassociated overweight to investment grade, mortgage-backedsecurities, when compared to the index, was the reason forthe under-performance. Figure 2 shows the long-term resultsfor Fixed Income.Real EstateIn FY <strong>2009</strong>, ISBI’s real estate portfolio earned a return <strong>of</strong>negative 31.7 %. The NCREIF Real Estate Index, a measure <strong>of</strong>core, operating, non-leveraged real estate, earned a negative19.6%. The portfolio’s underperformance relative to thisbenchmark can be attributed to ISBI’s prompt writing down <strong>of</strong>real estate assets, and a general lag on the part <strong>of</strong> the indexfor similar write downs. Further, while ISBI, as well as mostinstitutional investors, utilizes a prudent amount <strong>of</strong> leveragedin its real estate portfolio, the NCREIF Real Estate Index iscompletely un-levered. Over the last five years, the Boardincreased the real estate strategic allocation from 5% to 10%<strong>of</strong> the total fund with the new allocation targeting 70% <strong>of</strong> itsreal estate to core, income producing real estate, with thebalance in higher return strategies. The increased Real Estateallocation resulted in the addition <strong>of</strong> two core, separate realestate accounts. Originally, it was planned to have the newseparate accounts fully invested by the end <strong>of</strong> calendar year2008. However, as a result <strong>of</strong> challenging market conditions,ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF INVESTMENT5
% Investment Returns June 30201510Total FundComposite BenchmarkCPI50-5-10-20<strong>2009</strong> 2008 2007 2006 2005those accounts are yet to be fully funded.ISBI’s Real Estate portfolio is invested primarily throughinterests in separate accounts, limited partnerships, trusts,and other forms <strong>of</strong> pooled investments. Long-term results forreal estate are shown in Figure 2.Private EquityIn FY 2008, ISBI’s Private Equity portfolio returns were negative18.8%. The Private Equity portfolio consists <strong>of</strong> interests inlimited partnerships and other commingled vehicles that investin management buyouts, venture capital, and other privateplacement equity strategy activities. The Private Equity assetclass was challenged by disruptions in the credit markets andan overall weakness in pricing for the fiscal year period. Inspite <strong>of</strong> these challenges, long-term results as detailed inFigure 2 show that Private Equity remains the best performingasset class for the ten-year period ended June 30, <strong>2009</strong>.Management ExpensesThe resulting expense ratio (expenses divided by average fairvalue <strong>of</strong> assets) was .44% for fiscal year <strong>2009</strong>, as compared to.36% for fiscal year 2008. Total expenses for fiscal year <strong>2009</strong>,based on $8.7 billion in total assets were $41.2 million,compared to $41.9 million based on $11.3 billion in total assetsfor fiscal year 2008. Decreased aggregate expenses in fiscal<strong>2009</strong> were mainly a result <strong>of</strong> decreased fees paid to investmentmanagers.Minority/Female ParticipationJust as ISBI seeks prudent diversification within its totalportfolio, the Board continues to seek an appropriate level <strong>of</strong>diversity among the pr<strong>of</strong>essionals charged with meeting theBoard’s mission. The Board membership itself is comprised <strong>of</strong>33% minority and 22% women.ISBI operates under its own Minority Brokers and MoneyManagers Policy regarding utilization <strong>of</strong> minority and femaleowned broker/dealers, minority and female owned moneymanagers, and emerging managers. Since April, 2006, theBoard has achieved its minimum goal <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> the totalportfolio being managed by emerging and minority managers.At the end <strong>of</strong> FY <strong>2009</strong>, 25.7% <strong>of</strong> ISBI’s portfolio was managedby emerging, minority, and female owned firms. During fiscalyear <strong>2009</strong>, the Board increased the allocations to three <strong>of</strong> itsexisting emerging/minority managers: RhumbLine, DecaturCapital, and Rock Creek Capital.At its meeting held in July, 2008, the Board’s Minority Brokerand Money Managers Policy was amended to increase theminority broker/dealer target to 20% from 15%. The policyrequires that such trades be executed directly and prohibitsthe utilization <strong>of</strong> step-outs. Further, language was addedincorporating ISBI’s international equity portfolio into thepolicy. The Board’s policy also encourages utilization <strong>of</strong><strong>Illinois</strong>-based broker/dealers and establishes 25% utilization asa minimum.During fiscal year <strong>2009</strong>, utilization <strong>of</strong> minority-ownedILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF INVESTMENT6
- Page 1 and 2: 2009ANNUALREPORTILLINOISSTATEBOARDO
- Page 3 and 4: BOARD MEMBERSCHAIRMANRonald E. Powe
- Page 5: International Equity 17%U.S. Equity
- Page 9 and 10: FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSFISCAL YEARS EN
- Page 11 and 12: FINANCIALSTATEMENTS2009ILLINOIS STA
- Page 13 and 14: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALY
- Page 15 and 16: STATEMENT OF NET ASSETSJUNE 30, 200
- Page 18 and 19: Note 2Deposits, Investments, and In
- Page 20 and 21: Note 2 (continued)Deposits, Investm
- Page 22 and 23: Note 2 (continued)Deposits, Investm
- Page 24 and 25: Note 3 General StateMember Systems
- Page 26 and 27: Note 4PensionsPlan DescriptionAll o
- Page 28 and 29: SUPPLEMENTALFINANCIALINFORMATION200
- Page 30 and 31: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 32 and 33: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 34 and 35: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 36 and 37: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 38 and 39: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 40 and 41: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 42 and 43: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 44 and 45: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 46 and 47: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 48 and 49: Moody’s S&P Shares/Quality Qualit
- Page 51 and 52: PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 53 and 54: PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 55 and 56: PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 57 and 58:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 59 and 60:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 61 and 62:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 63 and 64:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 65 and 66:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 67 and 68:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 69 and 70:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 71 and 72:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 73 and 74:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 75 and 76:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 77 and 78:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 79 and 80:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 81 and 82:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 83 and 84:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 85 and 86:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 87 and 88:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 89 and 90:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 91 and 92:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 93 and 94:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 95 and 96:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 97 and 98:
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTSJUNE 30, 20
- Page 99 and 100:
PORTFOLIO DATAFISCAL YEARS ENDED JU
- Page 101 and 102:
INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS WITH BROKER
- Page 103 and 104:
RESTRICTED INVESTMENTSPublic Act 95
- Page 105:
STAFF AND INVESTMENT MANAGERSEXECUT