Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3 Hard coral percent cover data 12 of 14
Appendix 1: Video analysis biological community classification scheme Biota classes Morphological groups Definitions and examples Other biota Recorded for presence/absence only Microphytobenthos (MPB) Thin film layer (low, medium, high) Crustose coralline algae (CCA) Encrusting algae Turfing algae Hair-like algae 20 mm Seagrass Separated into genus or species Macroalgae Small algae Macroalgae 20 mm to 20 cm Membrane, thin sheets Padina spp., Lobophora spp. Foliaceous, bushy Caulerpa spp. Lobed, flattened and rounded Halimeda spp. Fleshy or ball-like Codium spp. Canopy algae Macroalgae >20 cm Flat Ecklonia radiata Branching Cystophora spp., Sargassum spp., other fucoids Hard Coral Branching At least 20 branching (e.g. Seriatopora hystrix) Digitate Less than 20 branching (e.g. Acroporid digitifera) Tabular Horizontal flattened plates (e.g. Acroporid hyacinthus) Encrusting Major portion attached to substrate as a laminar plate (e.g. Poritid vaughani) Foliose Coral attached at one or more points, leaf-like appearance e.g. Turbinaria spp.) Massive Solid boulder or mound (e.g. Favites spp.) Submassive Tends to small columns, knobs or wedges Soft Coral (BPP) Photosynthetic soft corals (BPP) Filter feeders Ahermatypic animals (not defined as BPP) Soft Coral (non-BPP) Non-photosynthetic soft corals Sponges Can note morphological groups Ascidians Hydroids Sea whips Gorgonian fans Sea pens Stalked, encrusting, solitary Bryozoan Foliose, stalked Anemones Polychaetes Tube, solitary Percent cover classes Cover value Decision rules >80% 90 no substrate visible 60–80% 70 some substrate is visible 40–60% 50 substrate is clearly visible but biota dominates the image frame 20–40% 30 substrate dominates most of the image frame 10–20% 15 substrate dominates most of the image frame 5–10% 7.5 substrate dominates most of the image frame 1–5% 3 trace densities 0–1% 0.5 no significant macro-biota 13 of 14
Page 1:
Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay
Page 5 and 6:
Client: Marine Produce Australia Re
Page 7 and 8:
Contents 1.� Purpose of this docu
Page 9:
List of Figures Figure 1.1� Locat
Page 12 and 13:
Table 1.1 Environmental Values and
Page 14 and 15:
In addition to the Conditions and C
Page 17:
Note: The habitats shown above are
Page 20 and 21:
2.3.1 Site selection Aquaculture ca
Page 22 and 23:
3. Environmental Objectives 3.1 Bes
Page 24 and 25:
4. Marine Monitoring Program Fish-f
Page 26 and 27:
the bottom of the water column. Sta
Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.2 EQG for water quality EQG
Page 30 and 31:
Table 4.3 EQS for water quality EQS
Page 32 and 33:
4.2 Sediment quality monitoring 4.2
Page 34 and 35:
Table 4.5 EQG for sediments EQG Ind
Page 36 and 37:
4.3 Coral reef monitoring 4.3.1 Obj
Page 38 and 39:
Indicator Light attenuation Chlorop
Page 40 and 41:
4.4 Sediment infauna monitoring 4.4
Page 42 and 43:
Indicator Zone of Ecological Protec
Page 44 and 45: 4.5 Biota monitoring and management
Page 46 and 47: 5. Marine Environmental Management
Page 48 and 49: Monitor Are�any�sea-cages�wit
Page 50 and 51: sample median calculated. However,
Page 52 and 53: EQG�(i)�or�(ii)� exceeded T
Page 54 and 55: 5.4.2 Movement of stock Movement or
Page 56 and 57: 7. Stakeholder Consultation 7.1 Det
Page 58 and 59: 8. Additional information Additiona
Page 60 and 61: � Administer all prescribed medic
Page 62 and 63: Category Issue Consequence Likeliho
Page 65 and 66: 9. Acknowledgements This EMMP was p
Page 67 and 68: EPA (2008) Report and recommendatio
Page 69: Appendix A Ministerial Statement 79
Page 72 and 73: 2 Proponent Nomination and Contact
Page 74 and 75: 2. Within the zone of High Ecologic
Page 76 and 77: The Proposal (Assessment No. 1642)
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Zones of ecological prote
Page 81: Appendix B Method Statement: Geo-re
Page 84 and 85: Report No. OCEMPA001 Rev A Revision
Page 86 and 87: 1. Introduction Geo Oceans was comm
Page 88 and 89: efore smoothly decreasing to zero a
Page 90 and 91: Table 3 Data fields captured in the
Page 92 and 93: 3. Results A total of 27332 rows of
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 2: Video analysis substrat
Page 99: Proposed Seagrass, water quality an
Page 105: Appendix E Responses to comments re
Page 108 and 109: Version Author Authority Comment MP
Page 124: Version Author Authority Comment MP
show all

Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?