Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Recommendations

Info

7. Stakeholder Consultation 7.1 Details of stakeholder consultation A letter outlining MPA's plans to expand operations from 1000 t/a to 2000 t/a annual production was forwarded to major stakeholder groups on the 10 November 2011 (Appendix D). The Stakeholder groups contacted are included in Table 7.1. Table 7.1 List of stakeholder groups contacted Name of Organisation Shire of Derby West Kimberley Name of Contact Person Shane Burge Both Posted or Emailed Kimberley Land Council Nolan Hunter Both None WAFIC Guy Leyland Both Recfishwest Andrew Matthews Both None The Wilderness Society Jenita Enevoldsen Both None Environs Kimberly Martin Prichard Both None Conservation Council Of WA Piers Verstengen Mail None Australian Marine Conservation Society Craige McGovern Both Tourism WA Neil Poh Both None Department of Fisheries Both None Department of Environment Kelran McNamara Both None Broome Fishing Club Jeff Cooper Both Mary Island Fishing Club Richard Macfarlan Emailed None Wanjina Wunggurr Aboriginal Corporation Bardi and Jawi Aboriginal Corporation Donny Woolagoodja Mail None Response John Albert Both None “At this time we do not have any comment to make on your planned proposal and are prepared to allow the EPA to assess your expansion plans as you have suggested.” “I wish to advise that Marine Produce has the full support of the Western Australian Fishing Council in its endeavours to expand production of barramundi. We appreciate the challenges in operating in such a remote area and we wish you well in regard to your future plans.” “Thanks for your email and attached letter. I’ve forwarded that on for you.” “The Broome Fishing Club sees aquacultured Barramundi as a more sustainable and environmentally amenable option to the wild caught product and as always you will have our full support.” 46 Oceanica: Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture, Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan
7.2 Feedback received At 11:00 am on the 22 November 2011, MPA had received four responses to the letter. The responses are outlined in Table 7.2. Table 7.2 Feedback received from stakeholder groups Name of Organisation Shire of Derby West Kimberley Name of Contact Person Shane Burge Both Posted or Emailed Kimberley Land Council Nolan Hunter Both None WAFIC Guy Leyland Both Recfishwest Andrew Matthews Both None The Wilderness Society Jenita Enevoldsen Both None Environs Kimberly Martin Prichard Both None Conservation Council Of WA Piers Verstengen Mail None Australian Marine Conservation Society Craige McGovern Both Tourism WA Neil Poh Both None Department of Fisheries Both None Department of Environment Kelran McNamara Both None Broome Fishing Club Jeff Cooper Both Mary Island Fishing Club Richard Macfarlan Emailed None Wanjina Wunggurr Aboriginal Corporation Bardi and Jawi Aboriginal Corporation Donny Woolagoodja Mail None Response John Albert Both None “At this time we do not have any comment to make on your planned proposal and are prepared to allow the EPA to assess your expansion plans as you have suggested.” “I wish to advise that Marine Produce has the full support of the Western Australian Fishing Council in its endeavours to expand production of barramundi. We appreciate the challenges in operating in such a remote area and we wish you well in regard to your future plans.” “Thanks for your email and attached letter. I’ve forwarded that on for you.” “The Broome Fishing Club sees aquacultured Barramundi as a more sustainable and environmentally amenable option to the wild caught product and as always you will have our full support.” Oceanica: Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture, Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan 47
Page 1:
Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay
Page 5 and 6: Client: Marine Produce Australia Re
Page 7 and 8: Contents 1.� Purpose of this docu
Page 9: List of Figures Figure 1.1� Locat
Page 12 and 13: Table 1.1 Environmental Values and
Page 14 and 15: In addition to the Conditions and C
Page 17: Note: The habitats shown above are
Page 20 and 21: 2.3.1 Site selection Aquaculture ca
Page 22 and 23: 3. Environmental Objectives 3.1 Bes
Page 24 and 25: 4. Marine Monitoring Program Fish-f
Page 26 and 27: the bottom of the water column. Sta
Page 28 and 29: Table 4.2 EQG for water quality EQG
Page 30 and 31: Table 4.3 EQS for water quality EQS
Page 32 and 33: 4.2 Sediment quality monitoring 4.2
Page 34 and 35: Table 4.5 EQG for sediments EQG Ind
Page 36 and 37: 4.3 Coral reef monitoring 4.3.1 Obj
Page 38 and 39: Indicator Light attenuation Chlorop
Page 40 and 41: 4.4 Sediment infauna monitoring 4.4
Page 42 and 43: Indicator Zone of Ecological Protec
Page 44 and 45: 4.5 Biota monitoring and management
Page 46 and 47: 5. Marine Environmental Management
Page 48 and 49: Monitor Are�any�sea-cages�wit
Page 50 and 51: sample median calculated. However,
Page 52 and 53: EQG�(i)�or�(ii)� exceeded T
Page 54 and 55: 5.4.2 Movement of stock Movement or
Page 58 and 59: 8. Additional information Additiona
Page 60 and 61: � Administer all prescribed medic
Page 62 and 63: Category Issue Consequence Likeliho
Page 65 and 66: 9. Acknowledgements This EMMP was p
Page 67 and 68: EPA (2008) Report and recommendatio
Page 69: Appendix A Ministerial Statement 79
Page 72 and 73: 2 Proponent Nomination and Contact
Page 74 and 75: 2. Within the zone of High Ecologic
Page 76 and 77: The Proposal (Assessment No. 1642)
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Zones of ecological prote
Page 81: Appendix B Method Statement: Geo-re
Page 84 and 85: Report No. OCEMPA001 Rev A Revision
Page 86 and 87: 1. Introduction Geo Oceans was comm
Page 88 and 89: efore smoothly decreasing to zero a
Page 90 and 91: Table 3 Data fields captured in the
Page 92 and 93: 3. Results A total of 27332 rows of
Page 94 and 95: Figure 3 Hard coral percent cover d
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 2: Video analysis substrat
Page 99: Proposed Seagrass, water quality an
Page 105: Appendix E Responses to comments re
Page 108 and 109:
Version Author Authority Comment MP
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124:
show all

Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?