Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Recommendations

Info

Indicator Light attenuation Chlorophyll-a N/A Ammonia Zone of Ecological Protection Moderate High Maximum* (i) Median LAC calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, must be less than the 80%ile or 95%ile of Reference Site data*, or (ii) Median LAC over a four month period, at any site, must be less than the 80%ile or 95%ile of Reference Site data* (i) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom) calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, not to exceed 500 μg/L or 1200 μg/L*, or (ii) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom), at any site, calculated over a four month period, not to exceed 500 μg/L or 1200 μg/L* (i) Median LAC calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, must be less than the 80%ile of Reference Site data, or (ii) Median LAC over a four month period, at any site, must be less than the 80%ile of Reference Site data Median chl-a calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion must be less than 3 x 50%ile of Reference Site data (i) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom) calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, not to exceed 500 μg/L, or (ii) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom) at any site, calculated over a four month period, not to exceed 500 μg/L (i) Median LAC calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, must be less than the 70%ile of Reference Site data, or (ii) Median LAC over a four month period, at any site, must be less than the 70%ile of Reference Site data Median chl-a calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion must be less than 2 x 50%ile of Reference Site data (i) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom) calculated from pooled sites, on each sampling occasion, not to exceed 250 μg/L, or (ii) 95%ile of total ammonia (50 cm from bottom) at any site, calculated over a four month period, not to exceed 250 μg/L Notes: * The EQG for Maximum Ecological Protection has been modified (from that included in Condition 5-3.3) in consultation with the OEPA. Environmental Quality Standards As per the multiple lines of evidence approach advocated in EPA (2005a), two indicators of coral reef system health are to be implemented (Table 4.8). To exceed the EQS, EQS (i) and (ii) must be exceeded for at least one of the indicators. Table 4.8 EQS for coral reef monitoring Indicator TSS Moderate Zone of Ecological Protection High Maximum If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the moderate protection guideline (95%ile): No action required If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the high protection guideline (80%ile): Proceed to EQS for high and maximum protection (i) Mean TSS over an 8 week period (based on fortnightly sampling) at coral monitoring sites not to be significantly greater than at coral reef Reference Sites as assessed by ANOVA, and (ii) Evaluation of images taken at coral monitoring sites must not indicate elevated incidences of coral mucous or colour reduction, relative to coral reef Reference Sites 28 Oceanica: Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture, Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan
Indicator LAC Zone of Ecological Protection Moderate High Maximum If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the moderate protection guideline (95%): No action required If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the high protection guideline (80%ile): Proceed to EQS for high and maximum protection Chlorophyll-a N/A Ammonia If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the moderate protection guideline (95%ile): No action required If EQG (i) and/or (ii) is exceeded and the exceedance is based on the high protection guideline (80%ile): Proceed to EQS for high and maximum protection (i) Mean LAC over an 8 week period (based on fortnightly sampling) at coral monitoring sites not to be significantly greater than at coral reef Reference Sites as assessed by ANOVA, and (ii) Evaluation of images taken at coral monitoring sites must not indicate elevated incidences of coral mucous or colour reduction, relative to coral reef Reference Sites (i) Mean LAC over an 8 week period (based on fortnightly sampling) is not significantly greater than the mean of LAC at the coral reef Reference Sites, as determined by ANOVA, or (ii) Evaluation of images taken at coral monitoring sites must not indicate elevated incidences of coral mucous or colour reduction, relative to coral reef Reference Sites (i) Evaluation of images taken at coral monitoring sites must not indicate elevated incidences of coral mucous or colour reduction, relative to coral reef Reference Sites Oceanica: Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture, Environmental Monitoring & Management Plan 29
Page 1: Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay
Page 5 and 6: Client: Marine Produce Australia Re
Page 7 and 8: Contents 1.� Purpose of this docu
Page 9: List of Figures Figure 1.1� Locat
Page 12 and 13: Table 1.1 Environmental Values and
Page 14 and 15: In addition to the Conditions and C
Page 17: Note: The habitats shown above are
Page 20 and 21: 2.3.1 Site selection Aquaculture ca
Page 22 and 23: 3. Environmental Objectives 3.1 Bes
Page 24 and 25: 4. Marine Monitoring Program Fish-f
Page 26 and 27: the bottom of the water column. Sta
Page 28 and 29: Table 4.2 EQG for water quality EQG
Page 30 and 31: Table 4.3 EQS for water quality EQS
Page 32 and 33: 4.2 Sediment quality monitoring 4.2
Page 34 and 35: Table 4.5 EQG for sediments EQG Ind
Page 36 and 37: 4.3 Coral reef monitoring 4.3.1 Obj
Page 40 and 41: 4.4 Sediment infauna monitoring 4.4
Page 42 and 43: Indicator Zone of Ecological Protec
Page 44 and 45: 4.5 Biota monitoring and management
Page 46 and 47: 5. Marine Environmental Management
Page 48 and 49: Monitor Are�any�sea-cages�wit
Page 50 and 51: sample median calculated. However,
Page 52 and 53: EQG�(i)�or�(ii)� exceeded T
Page 54 and 55: 5.4.2 Movement of stock Movement or
Page 56 and 57: 7. Stakeholder Consultation 7.1 Det
Page 58 and 59: 8. Additional information Additiona
Page 60 and 61: � Administer all prescribed medic
Page 62 and 63: Category Issue Consequence Likeliho
Page 65 and 66: 9. Acknowledgements This EMMP was p
Page 67 and 68: EPA (2008) Report and recommendatio
Page 69: Appendix A Ministerial Statement 79
Page 72 and 73: 2 Proponent Nomination and Contact
Page 74 and 75: 2. Within the zone of High Ecologic
Page 76 and 77: The Proposal (Assessment No. 1642)
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Zones of ecological prote
Page 81: Appendix B Method Statement: Geo-re
Page 84 and 85: Report No. OCEMPA001 Rev A Revision
Page 86 and 87: 1. Introduction Geo Oceans was comm
Page 88 and 89:
efore smoothly decreasing to zero a
Page 90 and 91:
Table 3 Data fields captured in the
Page 92 and 93:
3. Results A total of 27332 rows of
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 3 Hard coral percent cover d
Page 96 and 97:
Appendix 2: Video analysis substrat
Page 99:
Proposed Seagrass, water quality an
Page 105:
Appendix E Responses to comments re
Page 108 and 109:
Version Author Authority Comment MP
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124:
show all

Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?