Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

Recommendations

Info

Version Author Authority Comment MPA response Rev6 Rev6 Rev6 Oceanica Oceanica Oceanica OEPA OEPA OEPA 4. OEPA recommended removal of the reference to the TPS probe. Agreed. The EMMP has been amended. 5. OEPA suggested that MEPA EQG for coral communities are not required. 6. OEPA suggested some small changes to the flow diagrams in Figure 5.2 and 5.3. Agreed. The EMMP has been amended. A further caveat however is that these comments are based on analysis of temperate infauna communities in a relatively sheltered embayment. It is presently not known how these communities may compare to tropical communities located in highly flushed water bodies of the Kimberley. As the EQG in the MEPA may also be used to infer impacts in the HEPA (on an outgoing tide), the EQG must be retained.
Page 1:
Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay
Page 5 and 6:
Client: Marine Produce Australia Re
Page 7 and 8:
Contents 1.� Purpose of this docu
Page 9:
List of Figures Figure 1.1� Locat
Page 12 and 13:
Table 1.1 Environmental Values and
Page 14 and 15:
In addition to the Conditions and C
Page 17:
Note: The habitats shown above are
Page 20 and 21:
2.3.1 Site selection Aquaculture ca
Page 22 and 23:
3. Environmental Objectives 3.1 Bes
Page 24 and 25:
4. Marine Monitoring Program Fish-f
Page 26 and 27:
the bottom of the water column. Sta
Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.2 EQG for water quality EQG
Page 30 and 31:
Table 4.3 EQS for water quality EQS
Page 32 and 33:
4.2 Sediment quality monitoring 4.2
Page 34 and 35:
Table 4.5 EQG for sediments EQG Ind
Page 36 and 37:
4.3 Coral reef monitoring 4.3.1 Obj
Page 38 and 39:
Indicator Light attenuation Chlorop
Page 40 and 41:
4.4 Sediment infauna monitoring 4.4
Page 42 and 43:
Indicator Zone of Ecological Protec
Page 44 and 45:
4.5 Biota monitoring and management
Page 46 and 47:
5. Marine Environmental Management
Page 48 and 49:
Monitor Are�any�sea-cages�wit
Page 50 and 51:
sample median calculated. However,
Page 52 and 53:
EQG�(i)�or�(ii)� exceeded T
Page 54 and 55:
5.4.2 Movement of stock Movement or
Page 56 and 57:
7. Stakeholder Consultation 7.1 Det
Page 58 and 59:
8. Additional information Additiona
Page 60 and 61:
� Administer all prescribed medic
Page 62 and 63:
Category Issue Consequence Likeliho
Page 65 and 66:
9. Acknowledgements This EMMP was p
Page 67 and 68:
EPA (2008) Report and recommendatio
Page 69:
Appendix A Ministerial Statement 79
Page 72 and 73:
2 Proponent Nomination and Contact
Page 74 and 75: 2. Within the zone of High Ecologic
Page 76 and 77: The Proposal (Assessment No. 1642)
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Zones of ecological prote
Page 81: Appendix B Method Statement: Geo-re
Page 84 and 85: Report No. OCEMPA001 Rev A Revision
Page 86 and 87: 1. Introduction Geo Oceans was comm
Page 88 and 89: efore smoothly decreasing to zero a
Page 90 and 91: Table 3 Data fields captured in the
Page 92 and 93: 3. Results A total of 27332 rows of
Page 94 and 95: Figure 3 Hard coral percent cover d
Page 96 and 97: Appendix 2: Video analysis substrat
Page 99: Proposed Seagrass, water quality an
Page 105: Appendix E Responses to comments re
Page 108 and 109: Version Author Authority Comment MP
show all

Marine Produce Australia: Cone Bay Barramundi Aquaculture ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?