Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...
Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ... Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...
INTRODUCTION Aluminium and oxidative stress 64 The model involving aggravation of oxidative stress is among the most recognized hypothesis of aluminium neurotoxicity but the precise molecular mechanism by which it causes oxidative damage into the brain remains uncertain. Actually, a large number of studies confirmed the existence of a state of oxidative stress in most of the neurodegenerative disorders in which aluminium is present in relative high quantities. Numerous publications have detailed an increase in the formation of ROS after aluminium exposure both in vivo and in vitro (Katyal et al. 1997, Flora et al. 2003, Ogasawara et al. 2003, Nehru and Anand 2005). However, the reported results as a whole appear controversial, to such an extent that both pro-oxidant (Zatta et al. 2002, Exley 2004a) and antioxidant (Oteiza et al. 1993a, Abukadar et al. 2004a) properties have been attributed to this metal. The brain: a target for aluminium The brain is a main target for aluminium neurotoxicity as it is highly susceptible to oxidative insult for several reasons: (a) a high oxygen turnover as the brain consumes a proportionally larger amount of oxygen than other organs, around 20% of the body‟s oxygen (Halliwell 1992), (b) a low mitotic rate, (c) low concentrations/activities of brain antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), (d) (Halliwell and Gutteridge 1985) a large amount of highly oxidizable polyunsaturated fatty acids in neuronal cell membranes (Table 5), and (e) a high brain content of iron (Youdim 1988). Several hypotheses have been given to explain the possible link between aluminium and the promotion of oxidative stress (Exley 2004a). Actually, even though aluminium is not a transition metal, and consequently does not undergo redox reactions, it can cause oxidative stress both in vivo and in vitro through multiple mechanisms. As examples, it has been shown to stimulate in vitro iron-induced and non-iron-induced lipid peroxidation (Gutteridge et al. 1985, Verstraeten and Oteiza 2000, Meglio and
INTRODUCTION Oteiza 1999), non-iron-mediated oxidation of NADH (Meglio and Oteiza 1999, Kong et al. 1992), and non-iron-mediated formation of the � OH (Méndez-Álvarez et al. 2002). Table 5: Lipid composition of normal adult human brain (dry weight) (Zatta et al. 2002) Gray matter (%) White matter (%) Cholesterol 22 27.5 Total phospholipids 69.5 45.9 Phosphatidylserine 8.7 7.9 Galactocerebroside 5.4 19.8 Galactocerebroside sulphate 1.7 5.4 Aluminium catalyses iron-driven biological oxidations Aluminium was also shown to potentiate the capacity of pro-oxidants transition metals, such as iron and copper which are present in most cell compartments, to produce oxidative stress (Bondy and Kirstein 1996, Bondy et al. 1998). It was hypothesized that colloidal aluminium may complex these pro-oxidant metals and permit them to participate in Fenton reaction for an extended time (Yang et al. 1999, Campbell et al. 2001). Aluminium stimulates superoxide-/non-iron-driven biological oxidations We have seen that O2 ●─ is the ROS with the lowest oxidant capacity but it can undergo a one-electron transfer to generate H2O2 which can in turn through the Fenton reaction and in the presence of reduced metal ions, be converted to ● OH, increasing its redox potential. Various studies proposed that aluminium could enhance the O2 ●─ - mediated oxidation in different systems that generate this ROS: the photochemical decomposition of rose Bengal (Kong et al. 1992, Meglio and Oteiza 1999), the autoxidation of 6-OHDA (Méndez-Álvarez et al. 2002), the vanadium-mediated oxidation of NADH (Adler et al. 1995), and the xanthine/xanthine oxidase system 65
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 4: Dopamine catabolism (Mén
- Page 39 and 40: The basal ganglia INTRODUCTION The
- Page 41 and 42: The death of SNpc DAergic neurons I
- Page 43 and 44: INTRODUCTION the dorsomedial part o
- Page 45 and 46: INTRODUCTION characterized as are l
- Page 47 and 48: INTRODUCTION (Olanow et al. 2004).
- Page 49 and 50: Etiology and pathogenesis of PD INT
- Page 51 and 52: Ageing INTRODUCTION Ageing remains
- Page 53 and 54: INTRODUCTION The finding of MPTP to
- Page 55 and 56: INTRODUCTION may clarify why many n
- Page 57 and 58: Misfolding and aggregation of prote
- Page 59 and 60: INTRODUCTION (E3) (Figure 18A). Los
- Page 61 and 62: INTRODUCTION in connection with Par
- Page 63 and 64: INTRODUCTION Oxidative damage happe
- Page 65 and 66: DA metabolism as a source of ROS IN
- Page 67 and 68: Contribution of oxidative and nitro
- Page 69 and 70: Excitotoxicity INTRODUCTION Glutama
- Page 71 and 72: INTRODUCTION al. 1996, Cicchetti et
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental models of PD INTRODUCT
- Page 75 and 76: INTRODUCTION induce selective DAerg
- Page 77 and 78: ALUMINIUM General features INTRODUC
- Page 79 and 80: INTRODUCTION Varying amounts of alu
- Page 81 and 82: INTRODUCTION and antiperspirants co
- Page 83 and 84: INTRODUCTION approximately 3% of al
- Page 85 and 86: Excretion INTRODUCTION As insoluble
- Page 87: INTRODUCTION 3.5 mg may be increase
- Page 91 and 92: Aluminium as a cell membrane menace
- Page 93 and 94: INTRODUCTION mobilization of Ca 2+
- Page 95: Aluminium impairs neurotransmission
- Page 99 and 100: AIMS OF THE PRESENT THESIS The main
- Page 101: OBJETIVOS
- Page 104 and 105: OBJETIVOS 3) Evaluar de forma preci
- Page 107: CHAPTER 1 Time-course of brain oxid
- Page 110 and 111: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 86 6-OHDA (2
- Page 112 and 113: CHAPTER 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS Che
- Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER 1 followed by centrifugatio
- Page 116 and 117: CHAPTER 1 RESULTS Effects of 6-OHDA
- Page 118 and 119: CHAPTER 1 DISCUSSION 94 As shown by
- Page 120 and 121: CHAPTER 1 strategies or to study th
- Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER 1 Fig. 2 Changes in PCC in
- Page 125: CHAPTER 2
- Page 129 and 130: ABSTRACT CHAPTER 2 In the present w
- Page 131 and 132: MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals CHA
- Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 2 atomization used were 1,5
- Page 135 and 136: DISCUSSION CHAPTER 2 Aluminium ente
- Page 137: Table 1. Graphite furnace programme
INTRODUCTION<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>ium and <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>stress</strong><br />
64<br />
The model <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g aggravation <strong>of</strong> <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>stress</strong> is among the most<br />
recognized hypothesis <strong>of</strong> <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> <strong>neurotoxicity</strong> but the precise molecular mechanism<br />
by which it causes <strong>oxidative</strong> damage <strong>in</strong>to the bra<strong>in</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s uncerta<strong>in</strong>. Actually, a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> studies confirmed the existence <strong>of</strong> a state <strong>of</strong> <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>stress</strong> <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
neurodegenerative disorders <strong>in</strong> which <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> is present <strong>in</strong> relative high quantities.<br />
Numerous publications have detailed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> ROS after<br />
<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> exposure both <strong>in</strong> vivo and <strong>in</strong> vitro (Katyal et al. 1997, Flora et al. 2003,<br />
Ogasawara et al. 2003, Nehru and Anand 2005). However, the reported results as a<br />
whole appear controversial, to such an extent that both pro-oxidant (Zatta et al. 2002,<br />
Exley 2004a) and antioxidant (Oteiza et al. 1993a, Abukadar et al. 2004a) properties<br />
have been attributed to this metal.<br />
The bra<strong>in</strong>: a target for <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong><br />
The bra<strong>in</strong> is a ma<strong>in</strong> target for <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> <strong>neurotoxicity</strong> as it is highly susceptible<br />
to <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>in</strong>sult for several reasons: (a) a high oxygen turnover as the bra<strong>in</strong> consumes<br />
a proportionally larger amount <strong>of</strong> oxygen than other organs, around 20% <strong>of</strong> the body‟s<br />
oxygen (Halliwell 1992), (b) a low mitotic rate, (c) low concentrations/activities <strong>of</strong><br />
bra<strong>in</strong> antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and<br />
glutathione peroxidase (GPx), (d) (Halliwell and Gutteridge 1985) a large amount <strong>of</strong><br />
highly oxidizable polyunsaturated fatty acids <strong>in</strong> neuronal cell membranes (Table 5), and<br />
(e) a high bra<strong>in</strong> content <strong>of</strong> iron (Youdim 1988).<br />
Several hypotheses have been given to expla<strong>in</strong> the possible l<strong>in</strong>k between<br />
<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> and the promotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>stress</strong> (Exley 2004a). Actually, even though<br />
<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> is not a transition metal, and consequently does not undergo redox reactions,<br />
it can cause <strong>oxidative</strong> <strong>stress</strong> both <strong>in</strong> vivo and <strong>in</strong> vitro through multiple mechanisms. As<br />
examples, it has been shown to stimulate <strong>in</strong> vitro iron-<strong>in</strong>duced and non-iron-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />
lipid peroxidation (Gutteridge et al. 1985, Verstraeten and Oteiza 2000, Meglio and