Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...

Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ... Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...

dspace.usc.es
from dspace.usc.es More from this publisher
28.11.2012 Views

INTRODUCTION et al. 1993), probably through formation of insoluble complexes with aluminium ion in the gut (Schaefer et al. 1988). Three mechanisms, reviewed by Greger and Sutherland (1997), were proposed to explain the increase in aluminium absorption provoked by citrate: enhanced aluminium solubility in the gastrointestinal tract, transport of aluminium citrate into mucosal cells, and opening of epithelial tight junctions that are present between mucosal cells (Taylor et al. 1998). 58 Aluminium absorption does not seem to happen in the stomach where most aluminium is converted to soluble monomolecular species at low pH (Froment et al. 1989). At near-neutral pH aluminium precipitation occurs in the intestine. Consequently, the small portion of aluminium accessible for transport is the part that has been complexed with organic molecules in the stomach, allowing it to remain soluble at higher pH of the small intestine (Reiber et al. 1995). The primary site of aluminium absorption is the proximal intestine (Greger and Sutherland 1997). The precise mechanism of gastrointestinal absorption is not yet fully known. It has been suggested that intestinal absorption of aluminium occurs paracellularly along enterocytes and through tight junctions by passives processes (Exley et al. 1996) and transcellularly through enterocytes involving passive facilitated and active transport processes, such as calcium uptake and sodium transport processes, and a role for transferrin (Greger 1993, Greger and Sutherland 1997). Interestingly, it was suggested that each aluminium species likely has its own absorption mechanism (Van der Voet 1992). Intranasal absorption Inhalation exposure to aluminium occurs from cosmetic (aerosols), environmental and occupational sources (fumes, dusts, flakes). Inhaled aluminium was suggested to accumulate in the brain through absorption via the olfactory system (Roberts 1986, Exley et al. 1996) or through systemic absorption via the lung epithelia (Gitelman et al. 1995) and through the gastrointestinal tract as particulates are swallowed (Rollin et al. 1993). Pulmonary absorption seems to be more efficient than gastrointestinal absorption. Actually, Jones and Benett (1986) estimated that

INTRODUCTION approximately 3% of aluminium is absorbed into the blood from the lung. Although there is still controversy regarding the ability of aluminium to enter the brain from nasal cavity, it has been suggested that aluminium may be able of directly entering the brain from the nose through olfactory neurons. These latter, which are the only part of the CNS with direct contact to external milieu, are located in the roof of the nasal cavity and project to the olfactory bulb. These neurons synapse with complex pathways in the olfactory bulb which subsequently project to other cerebral areas, such as the olfactory cortex, cortex, and hippocampus. A few studies tried to demonstrate that aluminium distribution in the brain occurs through olfactory nerve uptake, axonal and trans- synaptic transport. Absorption of aluminium from the olfactory pathway has been studied in rabbits exposed to aluminium lactate application in the upper nasal cavity for one month. This resulted in aluminium accumulation in the olfactory bulb, pyriform cortex, hippocampus and cerebral cortex (Perl and Good 1987) although this prolonged exposure may probably have led to mechanical disruption of the olfactory epithelia (Lewis et al. 1994). Rats exposed to aluminium acetylacetonate had aluminium deposits in the olfactory bulb, ponsmedulla and hippocampus (Zatta et al. 1993). One nose-only exposure study showed that aluminium was also distributed to the brain stem of rats using aluminium chlorohydrate (Divine et al. 1999). Dermal absorption Aluminium chloride was shown to be absorbed through the skin when applied to the skin of mice, and to accumulate in both serum and brain, especially in the hippocampus (Anane et al. 1995). Nevertheless, systemic absorption of the metal may have been enhanced by mice shaving prior to its application. As aluminium chlorhydrate is the active ingredient extensivey used in antiperspirants, the skin was predicted to be another route of aluminium entry into the systemic circulation (Exley 2004b). Aluminium chlorhydrate is thought to precipitate inside the eccrine sweat glands and to form insoluble aluminium hydroxyde, which then physically blocks the sweat duct (Quartrale 1988, Teagraden et al. 1982) but its efficacy in reducing perspiration may also be due to chemical inhibition of the sweat gland (Strassburger and 59

INTRODUCTION<br />

et al. 1993), probably through formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>soluble complexes with <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> ion <strong>in</strong><br />

the gut (Schaefer et al. 1988). Three mechanisms, reviewed by Greger and Sutherland<br />

(1997), were proposed to expla<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> absorption provoked by<br />

citrate: enhanced <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> solubility <strong>in</strong> the gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al tract, transport <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> citrate <strong>in</strong>to mucosal cells, and open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> epithelial tight junctions that are<br />

present between mucosal cells (Taylor et al. 1998).<br />

58<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>ium absorption does not seem to happen <strong>in</strong> the stomach where most<br />

<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> is converted to soluble monomolecular species at low pH (Froment et al.<br />

1989). At near-neutral pH <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> precipitation occurs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Consequently, the small portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> accessible for transport is the part that<br />

has been complexed with organic molecules <strong>in</strong> the stomach, allow<strong>in</strong>g it to rema<strong>in</strong><br />

soluble at higher pH <strong>of</strong> the small <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e (Reiber et al. 1995). The primary site <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> absorption is the proximal <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e (Greger and Sutherland 1997). The<br />

precise mechanism <strong>of</strong> gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al absorption is not yet fully known. It has been<br />

suggested that <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al absorption <strong>of</strong> <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> occurs paracellularly along<br />

enterocytes and through tight junctions by passives processes (Exley et al. 1996) and<br />

transcellularly through enterocytes <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g passive facilitated and active transport<br />

processes, such as calcium uptake and sodium transport processes, and a role for<br />

transferr<strong>in</strong> (Greger 1993, Greger and Sutherland 1997). Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, it was suggested<br />

that each <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> species likely has its own absorption mechanism (Van der Voet<br />

1992).<br />

Intranasal absorption<br />

Inhalation exposure to <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> occurs from cosmetic (aerosols),<br />

environmental and occupational sources (fumes, dusts, flakes). Inhaled <strong>alum<strong>in</strong>ium</strong> was<br />

suggested to accumulate <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> through absorption via the olfactory system<br />

(Roberts 1986, Exley et al. 1996) or through systemic absorption via the lung epithelia<br />

(Gitelman et al. 1995) and through the gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al tract as particulates are<br />

swallowed (Roll<strong>in</strong> et al. 1993). Pulmonary absorption seems to be more efficient than<br />

gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al absorption. Actually, Jones and Benett (1986) estimated that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!