Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...
Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ... Mechanisms of aluminium neurotoxicity in oxidative stress-induced ...
CHAPTER 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals 88 6-OHDA hydrochloride, ascorbic acid, thiobarbituric acid (TBA), butylated hydroxytoluene crystalline (BHT), 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine hydrochloride, desferrioxamine, 1,1,3,3-tetramethoypropane, 5,5‟-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), sodium dodecylsulfate, EDTA, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Guanidine hydrochloride was from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI, USA). The water used for the preparations of solutions was of 18.2 MΩ (Milli-RiOs/Q-A10 grade, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA). All remaining chemicals used were of analytical grade and were purchased from Fluka Chemie AG (Buchs, Switzerland). Animal treatment A total of 32 male Sprague-Dawley rats, each weighing about 200 g, were used. All the experiments were carried out in accordance with the „„Principles of laboratory animal care‟‟ (NIH publication No. 86–23, revised 1985) and approved by the corresponding committee at the University of Santiago de Compostela. Rats were stereotaxically injected in the right striatum with 6 μg of 6-OHDA in 5 μl of sterile saline containing 0.2% ascorbic acid. Stereotaxic coordinates were 1.0 mm anterior to bregma, 2.7 mm right of midline, 5.5 mm ventral to the dura, and tooth bar at -3.3. The solution was injected with a 5 μl Hamilton syringe couple to a monitorized injector (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA) and the cannula was left in situ for 5 min after injection. All surgery was performed under equithesin anesthesia (3 ml/kg i.p.). Groups of four rats were decapitated at the following times after injection: 5 min, 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 3 days, and 7 days. A group of four rats (control) was sacrificed immediately after the administration of the saline.
Brain samples CHAPTER 1 After decapitation, the brain was removed, the striatum and ventral midbrain dissected, and the resulting samples frozen on dry ice. Each sample was immediately sonicated (250 Digital sonifer, Branson Ultrasonic Co., Danbury, CT, USA) with four volumes (w/v) a Na2PO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.4) isotonized with KCl and containing 200 μM BHT and 200 μM desferrioxamine. These compounds were used to prevent amplification of lipid peroxidation during the progression of the analysis. Determination of TBARS The TBARS determination was performed spectrophotometrically using a previously published method (Soto-Otero et al. 2002). Briefly, an aliquot of the sample (200 μl) was treated with SDS (8%, w/v) followed by acetic acid (20%) and the mixture vortexed for 1 min. Then, TBA (0.8%) was added and the resulting mixture incubated at 95°C for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature, 3 ml of n-butanol were added and the mixture shaken vigorously. After centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 5 min, the absorbance of the supernatant (organic layer) was measured at 532 nm using an UV- VIS spectrophotometer, model Lambda 35 (Perkin-Elmer Inc., Norwalk, CT, USA). For calibration, a standard curve (5–150 nM) was generated using the malonodialdehyde (MDA) derived by the acid hydrolysis (SO4H2; 1.5%, v/v) of 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEP) and the TBARS results expressed as nmol MDA/mg protein. The protein concentration of the sample was determined according to the method of Markwell et al. (1978), using BSA as the standard. Determination of protein carbonyl content (PCC) The PCC was assessed spectrophotometrically according to a procedure previously published (Hermida-Ameijeiras et al. 2004). Briefly, an aliquot of the sample was submitted to precipitation of nucleic acids with 1% streptomycin sulfate (1:9, v/v) 89
- Page 61 and 62: INTRODUCTION in connection with Par
- Page 63 and 64: INTRODUCTION Oxidative damage happe
- Page 65 and 66: DA metabolism as a source of ROS IN
- Page 67 and 68: Contribution of oxidative and nitro
- Page 69 and 70: Excitotoxicity INTRODUCTION Glutama
- Page 71 and 72: INTRODUCTION al. 1996, Cicchetti et
- Page 73 and 74: Experimental models of PD INTRODUCT
- Page 75 and 76: INTRODUCTION induce selective DAerg
- Page 77 and 78: ALUMINIUM General features INTRODUC
- Page 79 and 80: INTRODUCTION Varying amounts of alu
- Page 81 and 82: INTRODUCTION and antiperspirants co
- Page 83 and 84: INTRODUCTION approximately 3% of al
- Page 85 and 86: Excretion INTRODUCTION As insoluble
- Page 87 and 88: INTRODUCTION 3.5 mg may be increase
- Page 89 and 90: INTRODUCTION Oteiza 1999), non-iron
- Page 91 and 92: Aluminium as a cell membrane menace
- Page 93 and 94: INTRODUCTION mobilization of Ca 2+
- Page 95: Aluminium impairs neurotransmission
- Page 99 and 100: AIMS OF THE PRESENT THESIS The main
- Page 101: OBJETIVOS
- Page 104 and 105: OBJETIVOS 3) Evaluar de forma preci
- Page 107: CHAPTER 1 Time-course of brain oxid
- Page 110 and 111: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 86 6-OHDA (2
- Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER 1 followed by centrifugatio
- Page 116 and 117: CHAPTER 1 RESULTS Effects of 6-OHDA
- Page 118 and 119: CHAPTER 1 DISCUSSION 94 As shown by
- Page 120 and 121: CHAPTER 1 strategies or to study th
- Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER 1 Fig. 2 Changes in PCC in
- Page 125: CHAPTER 2
- Page 129 and 130: ABSTRACT CHAPTER 2 In the present w
- Page 131 and 132: MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals CHA
- Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 2 atomization used were 1,5
- Page 135 and 136: DISCUSSION CHAPTER 2 Aluminium ente
- Page 137: Table 1. Graphite furnace programme
- Page 141: CHAPTER 3 Brain oxidative stress an
- Page 144 and 145: CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION 120 The huma
- Page 146 and 147: CHAPTER 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS Che
- Page 148 and 149: CHAPTER 3 1:15 for hippocampus and
- Page 150 and 151: CHAPTER 3 initially incorporated to
- Page 152 and 153: CHAPTER 3 RESULTS In vivo effects o
- Page 154 and 155: CHAPTER 3 Effects of aluminium admi
- Page 156 and 157: CHAPTER 3 DISCUSSION 132 Aluminium
- Page 158 and 159: CHAPTER 3 hippocampus, showed simil
- Page 160 and 161: CHAPTER 3 assume that the distinct
CHAPTER 1<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Chemicals<br />
88<br />
6-OHDA hydrochloride, ascorbic acid, thiobarbituric acid (TBA), butylated<br />
hydroxytoluene crystall<strong>in</strong>e (BHT), 2,4-d<strong>in</strong>itrophenylhydraz<strong>in</strong>e hydrochloride,<br />
desferrioxam<strong>in</strong>e, 1,1,3,3-tetramethoypropane, 5,5‟-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid),<br />
sodium dodecylsulfate, EDTA, and bov<strong>in</strong>e serum album<strong>in</strong> (BSA) were purchased from<br />
Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Guanid<strong>in</strong>e hydrochloride was from Aldrich<br />
Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI, USA). The water used for the preparations <strong>of</strong> solutions<br />
was <strong>of</strong> 18.2 MΩ (Milli-RiOs/Q-A10 grade, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA). All<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g chemicals used were <strong>of</strong> analytical grade and were purchased from Fluka<br />
Chemie AG (Buchs, Switzerland).<br />
Animal treatment<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 32 male Sprague-Dawley rats, each weigh<strong>in</strong>g about 200 g, were used.<br />
All the experiments were carried out <strong>in</strong> accordance with the „„Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> laboratory<br />
animal care‟‟ (NIH publication No. 86–23, revised 1985) and approved by the<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g committee at the University <strong>of</strong> Santiago de Compostela. Rats were<br />
stereotaxically <strong>in</strong>jected <strong>in</strong> the right striatum with 6 μg <strong>of</strong> 6-OHDA <strong>in</strong> 5 μl <strong>of</strong> sterile<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>e conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0.2% ascorbic acid. Stereotaxic coord<strong>in</strong>ates were 1.0 mm anterior to<br />
bregma, 2.7 mm right <strong>of</strong> midl<strong>in</strong>e, 5.5 mm ventral to the dura, and tooth bar at -3.3. The<br />
solution was <strong>in</strong>jected with a 5 μl Hamilton syr<strong>in</strong>ge couple to a monitorized <strong>in</strong>jector<br />
(Stoelt<strong>in</strong>g, Wood Dale, IL, USA) and the cannula was left <strong>in</strong> situ for 5 m<strong>in</strong> after<br />
<strong>in</strong>jection. All surgery was performed under equithes<strong>in</strong> anesthesia (3 ml/kg i.p.). Groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> four rats were decapitated at the follow<strong>in</strong>g times after <strong>in</strong>jection: 5 m<strong>in</strong>, 1 h, 12 h, 24<br />
h, 48 h, 3 days, and 7 days. A group <strong>of</strong> four rats (control) was sacrificed immediately<br />
after the adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>of</strong> the sal<strong>in</strong>e.