Heat detection by - ICAR
Heat detection by - ICAR
Heat detection by - ICAR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Pierre CLEMENT, DVM, PhD student-<strong>ICAR</strong>-30/05/2012
Introduction : CREAVIA bovine activity1-Reproduction techniques- 3.000.000 AI doses sold/year- 1.000.000 AI/year- 8500 embryo transfer25 000 memberfarmers2-Bovine selection- Dairy (Holstein, Normande, Red Pied)- Beef (Charolais, Parthenais, Rouge desPrés)- 300 dairy bulls tested/year(Jocko Besne)3-Reproduction solutions for breeders- Calving sensors- <strong>Heat</strong> <strong>detection</strong> : <strong>Heat</strong>ime- Monitoring : <strong>Heat</strong>ime-RuminactPhenotyping
<strong>Heat</strong>ime-RuminactRuminact (HR)TAG :- Activimeter : activity/2h- Microphone : rumination time/2hDevelopmentDistribution EuropeSell FranceBOX :-Cow history : calving,AI, pregnancy testdates…-Algorithm for heat <strong>detection</strong>-Algorithms for health disorders<strong>detection</strong>• <strong>Heat</strong> <strong>detection</strong>• Health trouble <strong>detection</strong>• Nutrition monitoringInformative value of raw dataand alarms ?
Informative value of raw data and alarms ?I- Evaluate HR performance for heat <strong>detection</strong>under field conditions.A- Study 1 : HR <strong>detection</strong> compared with usual <strong>detection</strong> methods in dairy cowsB- Study 2 : Impact of HR use on reproduction results in commercial dairy herdsII- Informative value of HR rumination time ?
I- Evaluate HR performance for heat <strong>detection</strong>under field conditions.A- Study 1 : HR <strong>detection</strong> compared with usual <strong>detection</strong> methodsin dairy cowsB- Study 2 : Impact of HR use on reproduction results in commercial dairy herdsII- Informative value of HR rumination time ?
A- Study 1 : HR <strong>detection</strong> compared with usual <strong>detection</strong> methods in dairy cows(Philipot et al., 2010)1- Material and methods•43 Holstein cows (MY=9000kg)• <strong>Heat</strong> <strong>detection</strong> from calving until fecundation <strong>by</strong> : Visual inspection (3 times/day) HR (2 times/day, before milking) using manufacturer recomandations
Decision tree for heat validationHR <strong>detection</strong>Visual Inspection (VI)<strong>detection</strong> («Blindly»)No <strong>detection</strong>Progesterone dosage (Ovucheck milk, Biovet)True Positive False Positive True Positive False PositiveTotal of heatdetectedTotal HR <strong>detection</strong>sTotal VI <strong>detection</strong>s
2- Results and discussionDetection methodHR only HR&VI V I only TotalTP 16 71 27 114FP 7 0 4 11Total 23 71 3194 102HRVIRHD (Rateof <strong>Heat</strong>Detected)76%(87/114)86%(98/114)P
I- Evaluate HR performance for heat <strong>detection</strong>under field conditions.A- Study 1 : HR <strong>detection</strong> compared with usual <strong>detection</strong> methods in dairy cowsB- Study 2 : Impact of HR use on reproduction results incommercial dairy herdsII- Informative value of HR rumination time ?
B- Study 2 : Impact of HR use on reproduction results incommercial dairy herds1- Material and methods• Comparison of reproduction results of 2 herd groups04-2007/03-2008Before <strong>Heat</strong>ime04-2008 :1st <strong>Heat</strong>imeon CREAVIA area<strong>Heat</strong>imeNo <strong>Heat</strong>ime06-2009/05-2010Since <strong>Heat</strong>imeNo <strong>Heat</strong>imeNo <strong>Heat</strong>ime<strong>Heat</strong>imeNo <strong>Heat</strong>ime
Statistical analysis : ANOVA (proc GLM, SAS)Model :Yi = α + Xi b + εi, ε ~ Normal (0,σ2)- Calving-1st AI- AI-AI interval- 1st AI pregnancy rate-Parity-Period-<strong>Heat</strong>ime equipment-Period*equipment2- ResultsNo <strong>Heat</strong>ime<strong>Heat</strong>imeNumber of herds 1510 46Cows/herd 49 57Average production(kg/cow)8320 8280Fertility Index 0.67 0.66
93484690458640• No effect of <strong>Heat</strong>ime equipment on 1st AI pregnancy rate (40.5 vs 41.2, N.S.)• Potential gain…16 days on calving interval
•HR sensitivity = mean farmers sensitivity•HR PPV HR can be used « without risk » for heat <strong>detection</strong>,alone or as a complement to VI
I- Evaluate HR performance for heat <strong>detection</strong>under field conditions.A- Study 1 : HR <strong>detection</strong> compared with usual <strong>detection</strong> methods in dairy cowsB- Study 2 : Impact of HR use on reproduction results in commercial dairy herdsII- Informative value of HR rumination time ?
2x8 cowsF/C : 70/30(low risk ofacidosis diet : LR)F/C : 45/55(high risk ofacidosis diet )F/C : 30/70(3d acidosis challenges)N=1620 days mean ruminationtime/cow (h/day)Mean 6.3SD 1.5Min 4Max 9.6
•Important drop in mean rumination time during the 1st day of acidosischallenges : acidosis/SARA <strong>detection</strong>•High variability of rumination times between cows : potential geneticimprovement ?What could be the benefit to selectanimals on rumination time ?
1- Phenotyping-High variability of rumination times between cows• Ex : CREAVIA/Oniris ongoing studies :‣ Relationship between rumination and food intake ?‣ Relationship between rumination and entericmethane emission ?2- Monitoring-HR= sensitive and highly reliable system for heat <strong>detection</strong>• EX : CREAVIA/Oniris ongoing studies‣ Informative value of HR health alerts ?
Thank you for your attention…
Comparison of oestrus <strong>detection</strong> methods in dairy cattle(Holman et al., 2011)•67 Holstein cows (MY=11000kg)• <strong>Heat</strong> <strong>detection</strong> <strong>by</strong> :• Gold standard : progesteron dosage twice a week** ** p PPV Pedometer•Association <strong>Heat</strong>ime+VI increase <strong>detection</strong> sensitivity
HR(2x8 cows)Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13241212F/C : 70/30(low risk ofacidosis diet : LR)F/C : 45/55(high risk ofacidosis diet : HR)F/C : 30/70(3d acidosis challenges)