18 The <strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter | May 2, 2009CommentaryObama wants Turkey to acknowledge the GenocideEditorialNotebookby Vincent LimaYEREVAN – By 9:10 p.m. Yerevan time, I wasimpatient. “Will he go ahead <strong>and</strong> break hispromise already? It’s noon on April 24 inWashington, <strong>and</strong> we have a paper to put out,”I wrote on Facebook.When, almost two hours later, PresidentBarack Obama’s statement on “<strong>Armenia</strong>nRemembrance Day” arrived, I clicked Ctrl-F<strong>and</strong> searched for “geno.” Not found. No needfor a new front page, with extra-bold, extrablackletters (all caps <strong>and</strong> italics, perhaps).We could put a few finishing touches on thenewspaper <strong>and</strong> go to press.There was no question that as <strong>Armenia</strong>n-Americans we were deeply disappointed inour president. The comments I saw in theminutes, hours, <strong>and</strong> days that followed reflectedheartbreak <strong>and</strong> a deep sense of havingbeen betrayed by a friend.Betrayal was the word first used by theANCA to describe the president’s refusal to usethe word genocide in his statement. USAPACtreated it as a “missed opportunity,” meaning<strong>Armenia</strong>n-Americans were disappointed, butMr. Obama still had time to fulfill his campaignpledge. The <strong>Armenia</strong>n Assembly characterizedthe pledge as an “empty promise.”Mr. Obama’s leap forwardOver the weekend, I had a chance to read thepresidential statement again. The followingpassage strikes me as especially significant:I have consistently stated my own viewof what occurred in 1915, <strong>and</strong> my view ofthat history has not changed. My interestremains the achievement of a full, frank<strong>and</strong> just acknowledgment of the facts.For many years now, we have sought apresidential statement that calls the Aghedor Meds Yeghern a genocide. And that is thestatement Mr. Obama promised us. But let’stake a step back <strong>and</strong> recall why we seek sucha statement.We seek the presidential statement as away of achieving universal recognition of the<strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide, <strong>and</strong> especially recognitionby Turkey.The <strong>Armenia</strong>n Revolutionary Federation,for example, whose political arm in theUnited States is the ANCA, announced as lateas Monday, “the universal recognition <strong>and</strong>condemnation, especially by Turkey, of the<strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide” is an essential elementof <strong>Armenia</strong>’s national security.So if we seek recognition “especially by Turkey,”we may have an ally in the president ofthe United States. In his pre-election statementhe had noted, “I have stood with the<strong>Armenia</strong>n American community in calling forTurkey’s acknowledgement of the <strong>Armenia</strong>nGenocide.” And now, as president, he is statingan interest in “the achievement of a full,frank <strong>and</strong> just acknowledgment of the facts.”And his interest in this matter as presidentis not limited to a statement on April24, 2009. Let us not forget or underestimatewhat he did on April 6, 2009. The presidentwent to Turkey, stood before the Gr<strong>and</strong> <strong>National</strong>Assembly, <strong>and</strong> urged Turkey to addressthe “terrible events of 1915” in a way that is“honest, open, <strong>and</strong> constructive.”As betrayed as we may feel by his failureto use the words “<strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide,” wemust acknowledge that his statement beforethe Turkish parliament was a historic step.Not a bilateral issueWhile Mr. Obama’s stated intention is onethat we should fully support, his stated meansare problematic. In his statement of April 24,he wrote, “The best way to advance that goalright now is for the <strong>Armenia</strong>n <strong>and</strong> Turkishpeople to address the facts of the past as apart of their efforts to move forward.”The president is suggesting that Turkey ismost likely to acknowledge the Genocide inthe context of developing normal bilateralrelations with <strong>Armenia</strong>. And, he said in Turkey,he wants to avoid undermining that processby using the word genocide himself.The approach is problematic for variousreasons that have been discussed in the press(see, for example, the <strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter’s editorialfor April 25). The key reasons are:First, the Turkish government is not exhibitinggoodwill about confronting the past.At the very news conference in Turkey whereMr. Obama was careful to avoid underminingthe process, the president of Turkey, AbdullahGül, engaged in a full-throated denial ofthe Genocide. If he wanted to show good will,he could have expressed openness to reviewingthe sins of an earlier era.Second, genocide is a crime against humanity,not a bilateral issue between <strong>Armenia</strong><strong>and</strong> Turkey. It cannot rightly be a matterfor negotiations between Turkey <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armenia</strong>.I have yet to see a persuasive argumentthat reducing international pressure on Turkeywill encourage it to come to terms withits past.<strong>Armenia</strong>’s roleThe <strong>Armenia</strong>n government has helped theTurkish government make its case for forbearanceon Mr. Obama’s part. The optimistic<strong>and</strong> ill-timed joint statement of the foreignministries of <strong>Armenia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Turkey on April22 oddly came only two days after PresidentSerge Sargsian explicitly acknowledgedthat the talks were not going so well.Mr. Sargsian had told the Wall Street Journalon April 20 that his government <strong>and</strong> “theTurkish side in the negotiations supportedthe idea that we are negotiating without anypreconditions.” But, he said, “I think alreadynow the motivation of Turkey has decreased,because . . . Prime Minister Erdogan is nowoffering preconditions.” Indeed, on April 19Mr. Erdogan had announced, “If the <strong>Armenia</strong>noccupation of Azeri territory continues,Turkey will not open its border gate.”At the same time, Mr. Sargsian set fortha deadline: October 14, 2009. That is thedate of the <strong>Armenia</strong>-Turkey soccer match inKayseri. Mr. Sargsian had invited Mr. Gül towatch the World Cup qualifying match in Yerevanon September 6, 2008. Mr. Gül went<strong>and</strong> then invited Mr. Sargsian to watch thereturn match in Kayseri. Mr. Sargsian toldthe Wall Street Journal, “Obviously settingpreconditions at a point where the perimetersare already set <strong>and</strong> we are very close toa breakthrough is absolutely not acceptablefor us. Of course, if the border is open or ison the eve of opening, I will visit Turkey toattend the return match.” And if it is not, hewill not attend, he said.The next 200 daysSo what are the next steps?First, the president <strong>and</strong> foreign minister of<strong>Armenia</strong> insist that the normalization of <strong>Armenia</strong>-Turkeyrelations should proceed withno preconditions <strong>and</strong> without further delay.(Indeed, if there are no preconditions, whydelay opening the border <strong>and</strong> establishingdiplomatic relations?) The U.S. State Departmenthas likewise announced, “Normalizationshould take place without preconditions<strong>and</strong> within a reasonable timeframe.”Through the administration <strong>and</strong> Congress,we must insist that any preconditions imposedby Turkey are unacceptable, <strong>and</strong> October14 should be considered a firm deadline.Second, on the fairly safe assumption thatefforts toward the normalization of relationsbetween <strong>Armenia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Turkey do not lead to“a full, frank <strong>and</strong> just acknowledgment of thefacts” by Turkey, we should ask Mr. Obama toreconsider “the best way to advance that goal.”The preferred means would be a forceful presidentialstatement acknowledging the Genocide<strong>and</strong> calling on Turkey to do likewise.In short, as we go forward, we should notconsider Mr. Obama’s campaign pledge a lostcause. On the contrary, we should take theadditional commitment he made on April 24– the commitment to achieving “a full, frank<strong>and</strong> just acknowledgment of the facts” byTurkey – together with his campaign pledgeas a starting point to pursue the larger goal ofhaving Turkey acknowledge the Genocide. fCommentsThe article above was posted on Facebook onWednesday. Here are some of the commentsposted in response, printed with permission.Emil Sanamyan at 7:24 p.m. April 29What annoyed me the most about thestatement was the use of “Mets Yeghern”borrowed from Bush’s 2005 statement <strong>and</strong>before that from Pope John Paul II. For me,that made Obama’s commitment so muchmore artificial.As Harut Sassounian pointed out in hiscommentary, Obama’s reference to his preelectionstatement is also not new <strong>and</strong> wasemployed by Bush, Sr.From the point of view of community interest,it seems we are too fixated on the Gword in this one statement, almost at the expenseof any other expression of respect thatour government could pay our community.For example, had Obama showed up atan <strong>Armenia</strong>n church service somewhere lastWith Turkey’sPrimeMinisterErdogan(rear right)present,PresidentObama urgedTurkey toaddressthe “terribleevents of1915” in away thatis “honest,open, <strong>and</strong>constructive.”Ankara, April6, 2009.AP Photo/CharlesDharapak.weekend, or engaged in some other form oflive interaction with <strong>Armenia</strong>ns – with mediacoverage – that could send a real messagethat he cares, <strong>and</strong> be more effective in gettingthat message out than simply issuing astatement even with the G word.Emil Sanamyan at 7:29 p.m. April 29Had it not been for Turkish opposition tothe statement, the president’s April 24 statementwould be in the same sort of categoryof obscurity as most other utterances releasedby a president on any given day.Emil Sanamyan at 7:41 p.m. April 29And the same goes for the nonbindingresolution.Nareg Seferian at 7:58 p.m. April 29Could we somehow also express that theborder opening shouldn’t really be a bargainingchip of any sort? It’s not like Turkey willdo <strong>Armenia</strong> a favor by opening the border;the border ought to be open anyway.Harout Topsacalian at 10:21 p.m. April 29Sure it would have been nice for Obama tosay it, but he still has three years to keep hispromise. Also, as all eyes are on Turkey to fulfillits obligations <strong>and</strong> “deal with its history inan open way,” the U.S. will continue to havethe “stick” of this declaration available.Garabet Moumdjian at 9:29 a.m. April 30Well, did he not say it because it’s not anelection year? And he might do so when midtermelections come around <strong>and</strong> Democratswould need to maintain a majority in bothhouses?Come on guys. It’s a game <strong>and</strong> they areplaying with our nerves. I think the manpower<strong>and</strong> money we are spending on thisissue will be much better spent on anotherworthwhile cause.Katy Pearce at 11:34 a.m. April 30Great piece Vincent!Patricia Constantinian-Voskeridjian at7:00 p.m. April 29I have had a number of thoughts regardingrecent developments surrounding Turkey,<strong>Armenia</strong>, <strong>Armenia</strong>ns, <strong>and</strong> Obama. I haven’treally been following things too intensively,given how full my plate currently is withwork <strong>and</strong> kids, so I apologize if my impressionscome across somewhat fragmented, incomplete,<strong>and</strong> not fully formulated. But herethey are for what it’s worth.My first thought goes to something saidContinued on page 19 m<strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter (ISSN 0004-2358), an independent newspaper,is published weekly by <strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter llc.Copyright © 2009 by <strong>Armenia</strong>nReporter llc. All Rights ReservedGerard L. Cafesjian, President <strong>and</strong> ceoPeriodicals postage paid at Paramus, N.J., <strong>and</strong>additional mailing offices.POSTMASTER: Send address changes to PO Box129, Paramus, NJ 07652-0129.The views expressed, except in the editorial, arenot necessarily those of the publishers.Editor Vincent LimaAssociate editor Maria TitizianWashington editor Emil SanamyanEastern U.S. editor Lou Ann MatossianAssistant to the Editor Seda StepanyanCopy editor Ishkhan JinbashianArt director Grigor HakobyanThe <strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter is your newspaper. We urge you to send us your news <strong>and</strong> yourviews.<strong>News</strong>. Please send your news to .Letters. Please send your letters to Letters should be no morethan 250 words long <strong>and</strong> may be edited for clarity. Please include your mailing address<strong>and</strong> daytime telephone number.Commentary. Please send your essays to Essays <strong>and</strong> articlesnormally should be no longer than 900 words.Photos <strong>and</strong> artwork. We require high-resolution originals. All photos <strong>and</strong> artworkmust include a credit to the photographer <strong>and</strong> a signed statement granting us permissionto publish.Advertising <strong>and</strong> subscriptions. Please direct questions to orcall us.Our offices2727 West Alameda BlvdBurbank CA 915051-818-955-9933 phone1-818-955-8799 fax1 Yeghvard Hwy Fl 5Yerevan 0054 <strong>Armenia</strong>374-10-367-195 phone374-10-367-194 fax
The <strong>Armenia</strong>n Reporter | May 2, 2009 19CommentaryLiving in<strong>Armenia</strong>The power of the peopleby Maria TitizianLettersWhenever there’s imbalance in the world,events, either natural or artificial, occur thatplace things in their proper order.Political developments in <strong>Armenia</strong> canchange rapidly as can people’s perceptions ofthe world in which they live <strong>and</strong> it can dictatetheir every move.For the past ten months, <strong>Armenia</strong>-Turkeyrapprochement has been on the forefront of<strong>Armenia</strong>’s domestic <strong>and</strong> foreign policy agenda.Football diplomacy became the diplomaticcatchphrase everyone from the UnitedStates to Russia was referring to.Relations with a neighbor with whom wehave deep historical grievances <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>swas further compounded when Turkeyslammed the border shut in solidarity withAzerbaijan over the Nagorno Karabakh conflict16 years ago. While an air corridor betweenour two countries exists, l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> railcrossings have not been realized since 1993.On the morning of April 23, 2009 we wokeup to a different world. <strong>Armenia</strong>’s foreign affairsministry at approximately 1:30 in themorning, Yerevan time had released a statementthat <strong>Armenia</strong> <strong>and</strong> Turkey, throughSwiss mediation had agreed to some elusiveroad map, one which we have yet to fullyunderst<strong>and</strong>. While Turkish media is on afree-for-all, disseminating misinformation,the <strong>Armenia</strong>n media is still scrambling to getanswers from its leadership. That same day,Yerkir Media, a local TV station posed a questionto the foreign affairs ministry, askingwhat the road map was. The answer that theministry later circulated to all media outletsin the country was that in diplomatic lingo,road map means a plan of action, a term oftenused in diplomatic negotiations. No kidding.The Middle East has had a road map forthe past twenty years...All of this one day before the 94th anniversaryof the greatest tragedy in our collectivehistory. The <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide is anintrinsic component of our national identity.It’s the one issue that unites us among a divergenceof opinions regarding every aspectof our nationhood.I have walked to Tsitsernagaberd, theGenocide memorial in Yerevan for the pastnine years with my compatriots. Every year Ihave witnessed the solemn journey that <strong>Armenia</strong>nsin the homel<strong>and</strong> embark upon topay their respect to their slain forefathers.Every year I am moved. This year somethingelse took place.While admittedly, only a small percentageof <strong>Armenia</strong>ns globally are truly engagedin issues impacting statehood, <strong>and</strong> an evensmaller percentage of <strong>Armenia</strong>ns in <strong>Armenia</strong>are engaged <strong>and</strong> while I don’t believe thatpeople had the time or the capacity in a 24hour period to analyze the events that wereunfolding before us, there was a collectiveunderst<strong>and</strong>ing that something was askew inour national life.Hence the remarkable numbers of peoplemaking the annual journey to Tsitsernagaberdthis year.Even in 2005, when for the 90th anniversaryof the <strong>Armenia</strong> Genocide, a plethora ofevents were organized in <strong>Armenia</strong>, not asmany people made the journey to the Genocidememorial.By 6:00 P.M. this year, the flowers werealready about two meters high <strong>and</strong> thenumbers of people coming to pay their respectsby the eternal flame were increasingby the hour. At approximately 9:45 P.M.Tzitzernakaberd, April 24, 2009. Photo: MkhitarKhachatryan/Photolure.<strong>Armenia</strong>’s state run television announcedthat already 800,000 people had been tothe monument, <strong>and</strong> the numbers keptgrowing. Watching the swelling crowdsat the memorial on television, caused ourhearts to swell with a mixture of pride <strong>and</strong>trepidation.What did this mean? Why was there suchan overwhelming need, this year, to go to themonument?The <strong>Armenia</strong>n people understood thatthey had to come out, they had to show theworld that regardless of what kind of roadmap their authorities had agreed to with theTurkish side, they would never forget <strong>and</strong>never stop dem<strong>and</strong>ing justice. It was a nationalobligation. It was a personal obligationto our gr<strong>and</strong>parents who had witnessed akind of hatred that leaves its scent on generations<strong>and</strong> generations to come.But the <strong>Armenia</strong>ns in Yerevan were notthe only ones who felt that something thatmight change the course of our lives, or ourcountry was developing. Most instinctivelyfelt the tug of history, of what shadowy relationswith our much stronger neighbor to thewest was capable of. From Stepanakert, thecapital of Nagorno Karabakh to Akhaltskha,Akhalkalak, <strong>and</strong> Ninotsminda in Javakhk,to Gyumri under a freak snow storm, <strong>Armenia</strong>nspaid tribute, they remembered, theydem<strong>and</strong>ed recognition <strong>and</strong> justice.Right across the globe, <strong>Armenia</strong>ns dispersedto the winds because of the Genocide,marched, demonstrated, held c<strong>and</strong>lelightvigils, organized exhibitions, had book readings,<strong>and</strong> film screenings, clashed with riotpolice, h<strong>and</strong>ed over memor<strong>and</strong>ums to Turkishmissions in all the major <strong>and</strong> some not-somajorcapitals around the world.Watching <strong>Armenia</strong>ns in different countriescommemorating the 94th anniversaryof the <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide, I realized we areso unbelievably strong when we are united. Asmall nation, so small that people can forgetwe exist, yet our voices can be so strong as tobring global attention to the one thing thatwiped away even our personal histories, the<strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide.While the future is somewhat blurry <strong>and</strong>both the homel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Diaspora arestruggling; while <strong>Armenia</strong>ns <strong>and</strong> Turks aretalking <strong>and</strong> the Azeris are sulking <strong>and</strong> theRussians <strong>and</strong> the Americans are maneuvering<strong>and</strong> who knows what Iran is thinking, Iam so proud to be an <strong>Armenia</strong>n. fObama’s statement was“astonishing”Sir:It was astonishing to read that PresidentObama did not use the word genocide to describethe slaughter of nearly 2 million <strong>Armenia</strong>nsin 1915–23, knowing that the word wascoined by jurist Raphael Lemkin specificallyto describe the barbarity that befell the <strong>Armenia</strong>nsat the h<strong>and</strong>s of the Turkish state.Dr. Lemkin, a lawyer of Polish-Jewish descent<strong>and</strong> Holocaust survivor, used the wordgenocide in 1943 to describe the genocide ofthe <strong>Armenia</strong>ns <strong>and</strong> then the Holocaust. Dr.Lemkin played an important role in compellingthe United Nations to adopt the Conventionon the Prevention <strong>and</strong> Punishment ofthe Crime of Genocide in 1948.In a 1949 CBS <strong>News</strong> interview, Dr. Lemkintalked about the UN Convention <strong>and</strong>the <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide. Showing footage ofTurkish soldiers brutally chasing <strong>and</strong> killing<strong>Armenia</strong>ns, Dr. Lemkin explained that theTurkish state acted with the intent to annihilatenearly 2 million <strong>Armenia</strong>ns, who weredriven from their homes to perish in the desertor die before they got there.Before the word genocide existed, Britishprime minister Winston Churchill <strong>and</strong>world leaders described the events as the“<strong>Armenia</strong>n holocaust.” President Obama,who does not speak <strong>Armenia</strong>n, used the<strong>Armenia</strong>n phrase “Mets Yeghern” (GreatCatastrophe), thus shielding Turkey fromany accountability for its crime of genocideunder the UN convention <strong>and</strong> internationallaw.Imagine if back in the days of West Germany,the U.S. president refrained from usingthe word Holocaust, not wanting to offendor sour relations with a strategic NATO ally,only describing the destruction of EuropeanJewry during World War II as “Ha Shoah.”Very truly yours,Berge JololianCambridge, Mass.Just say it alreadySir:<strong>Armenia</strong>ns, stop fooling yourselves aboutthe U.S. government <strong>and</strong> “Genocide”!Nobody welcomed the election of PresidentObama more than I. But on April 24, Mr.Obama thought he would appease Turkey bysubstituting the phrase “Mets Yeghern” forthe exact word that he had used throughouthis presidential campaign, “Genocide.”His attempt at cleverness failed miserably.He fell into a trap when Turkey’s President Gülnot only praised him for dropping genocide, butalso shot back that Mr. Obama should havealso referred to the “hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s ofTurks” who were killed in the world war.Worst of all, just as Mr. Gül expected, theAmerican media dutifully published the disingenuousTurkish response, word for word.In Mr. Obama’s April 24 statement, heclaimed that his “interest remains theachievement of a full, frank <strong>and</strong> just acknowledgmentof the facts,” which he knows fullwell is totally impossible because the Turkshave thoroughly established that despite theenormous weight of irrefutable documentationby qualified historians <strong>and</strong> eyewitnessesto the contrary, only their version of eventsis to be tolerated. Ever.Better that he should endorse an internationalconference to determine whether pie ala mode can ever be served without ice cream.That, at least, might be amusing.Meanwhile, Mr. President, please be “perfectlyclear” when you contend that yourviews of the slaughter of <strong>Armenia</strong>ns had notchanged. It is not difficult. Instead of leavingit to your readers or listeners to look up whatyou had said, “Say it!”Very truly yours,George AvakianNew YorkA timeline, pleaseSir:When <strong>and</strong> why did Europe cease using theterm holocaust for the <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide,<strong>and</strong> when <strong>and</strong> why did Turkey begin to denythe Genocide?<strong>Armenia</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Armenia</strong>ns all over theworld are marking the 94th anniversary ofthe <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide. During the past 94years, <strong>Armenia</strong>ns have put all their energy<strong>and</strong> effort trying to prove to the world <strong>and</strong>to Turkey that the events of 1896–1923 weredeliberate <strong>and</strong> calculated genocide, not verydissimilar from the acts of Nazi Germanyagainst the Jews.The wartime prime minister of Great BritainDavid Lloyd George, in his Memoirs of aPeace Conference (1939) wrote, “The actionof the British government led inevitably tothe terrible massacres of 1895–97, 1909, <strong>and</strong>most of all the holocaust of 1915.”Arnold Toynbee, in his book Murder of aNation used the words “<strong>Armenia</strong>n Holocaust”to describe the unfolding genocide against<strong>Armenia</strong>ns. Before Raphael Lemkin’s coiningof the word genocide, the term holocaustwas used in the English language to indicatewholesale <strong>and</strong> organized destruction of a civilianpopulation. The exclusivity of the wordholocaust only for the murder of the Jewsappears much later.Soon after the events many books werepublished in Turkey, probably with the approvalof the Turkish censor, indicating thatthe then-rulers of Turkey had acknowledgedthe events <strong>and</strong> were not shying away fromlearning about them.My question to <strong>Armenia</strong>n Genocide expertsis this: When <strong>and</strong> why did Europe ceaseusing the word holocaust for the <strong>Armenia</strong>ns?Similarly when <strong>and</strong> why did Turkey begin todeny the Genocide?Very truly yours,Dr. Vrej NersessianLondonObama wants Turkey to acknowledge the Genociden Continued from page 18by Turkish novelist Elif Shafak, somethingto the effect that <strong>Armenia</strong>ns’ relationship tothe past is one of remembering, while forthe Turks it’s one of forgetting. When Gülgets the final word (as in the joint press conference)<strong>and</strong> says that the “happenings” of1915 are a historical matter to be decided byhistorians from both sides, he is speakingvery much as a Turk who believes the pastis there to be forgotten. For Turks, historybegins with Atatürk.I then think about what “history” actually is,<strong>and</strong> why Gül would think it beneficial to framethe Genocide as something for historians fromboth sides to study <strong>and</strong> resolve. History is adiscipline, a social science, <strong>and</strong> as such, historiansseek to elucidate doubt as well as fact.Historians develop hypotheses <strong>and</strong> formulatetheories, not truth. As long as it’s decided byhistorians, it’s not necessarily “truth,” <strong>and</strong> itcan be excluded from a political process.Obama, however, seems to be framing theGenocide issue as an integral part of a politicalprocess, <strong>and</strong> as long as that continuesit’s probably a positive thing for <strong>Armenia</strong>ns.When framed as part of a political process,it is possible to include notions of reparation<strong>and</strong> justice that have legal implications.The historicity of it almost becomes secondary.Yes, it’s disappointing that he didn’t gothe full distance, but can he do so as headof a government that hasn’t yet passed aGenocide bill? He’s always been a masterof “both/<strong>and</strong>” rather than “either/or”. Incalling it “Mets Yeghern” in <strong>Armenia</strong>n, heactually switches codes. He both says it <strong>and</strong>doesn’t say it.Framing it as part of a political process,however, implies that both sides are goingto have to make some concessions. For many<strong>Armenia</strong>ns, the thought of any concessionson the matter of the Genocide is unbearable<strong>and</strong> unthinkable. This may be due, partly, to adeeply held notion that there can be no healingwithout acknowledgement. I personallydon’t believe this. Many survivors of traumacan <strong>and</strong> do actually transcend their trauma<strong>and</strong> in some ways, this facilitates eventualacknowledgement.Regards,PatriciaDo you have a comment? Write letters@reporter.amf
- Page 1 and 2: Atom Egoyantalks abouthis new film,
- Page 3 and 4: Number 112May 2, 2009the armenianre
- Page 5 and 6: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 7 and 8: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 9 and 10: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 11 and 12: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 13 and 14: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 16: 14 The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2
- Page 19: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009
- Page 23 and 24: The Armenian Reporter | May 2, 2009