12.07.2015 Views

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development - World Bank Internet ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

highest potential for savings. Currently, IFC has devotedstaff attention to small loans <strong>of</strong>fering only a few thousandtons per year <strong>of</strong> CO 2savings, and in at least one case (theabove-noted distribution utility) failing to follow up on aproject <strong>of</strong>fering energy and CO 2savings a hundred timesgreater. IFC has just hired an expert in building energyefficiency—how should this expert’s scarce time be allocatedfor maximum impact? Third, IFC could encourage benchmarking<strong>of</strong> performance among its smaller direct clientsand among clients <strong>of</strong> financial intermediaries, preparingstandardized audit services and loan products for them.Systems issuesEnergy efficiency can <strong>of</strong>fer a cost-effective alternative tonew generation, but this may be overlooked in the absence<strong>of</strong> a view <strong>of</strong> the entire power system. Similarly, thecongestion impacts <strong>of</strong> new generation on transmission canbe overlooked. A systems view is important to address thedegree to which energy efficiency provokes “snap-back”—increased consumption <strong>of</strong> electricity as its effective pricedrops.Learning and feedbackMost <strong>of</strong> the financial intermediation projects had a rationale<strong>of</strong> promoting diffusion <strong>of</strong> financial technologies—thatis, the techniques <strong>of</strong> appraising and structuring energy efficiencyloans. However, this was most effective in China,where the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Energy Conservation Project (especially)and IFC’s CHUEE Program (to a lesser extent) sought tobuild networks and disseminate information throughoutthe financial and end-user industries. In contrast, mostother projects did not create explicit channels for diffusion,and banks had little motivation for sharing their learningwith competitors.<strong>The</strong>re remains a tremendous need tounderstand what works and what does notin the evolving field <strong>of</strong> energy efficiency.<strong>The</strong>re remains a tremendous need to understand whatworks and what does not in this still-evolving field. Financialreturns to energy efficiency are poorly and inconsistentlymeasured. A lack <strong>of</strong> monitoring information on thestate <strong>of</strong> T&D losses weakens power planning and makes itmore difficult to locate high-return investments. And thereis a desperate need for applied operations research in efficientlighting programs to understand which consumer andproducer barriers are most salient and which interventionsare most effective.<strong>The</strong> first phase <strong>of</strong> this evaluation stressed the importance<strong>of</strong> developing indicators for energy efficiency to set targetsand assess progress. Learning is critical, because energyefficiency promotion is less well understood than renewableenergy promotion. However, current project-levelmethodologies are haphazardly applied, <strong>of</strong>ten lack ex postmeasurement, and are inconsistent in their treatment <strong>of</strong>projects that combine retr<strong>of</strong>its with capacity expansion.<strong>The</strong> United Nations Industrial <strong>Development</strong> Organization,however, has documented that it is possible to set up informationnetworks that facilitate benchmarking and sharing<strong>of</strong> infromation on efficiency performance. At the nationallevel, several countries are beginning to assemble sectoralinformation on energy efficiency, as a recent ESMAPsponsoredworkshop showed. “Bottom-up” indicators, forexample, for particular industry sectors or for power distributionlosses, would be more useful for the purposes discussedhere than national level indicators.Energy Efficiency | 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!