direct testimony of the capital expenditures, reliability, and - nyseg
direct testimony of the capital expenditures, reliability, and - nyseg direct testimony of the capital expenditures, reliability, and - nyseg
Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYSEG)DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES,RELIABILITY, AND OPERATIONS PANEL12345678910111213141516171819202122density and proximity to energized conductors that can be achieved with periodic,scheduled clearing, and the reduction in handling costs for the large trees removedduring the first cycle can mitigate the cost of subsequent clearing cycles. Further,a comprehensive cycle program would allow for even more efficient planning andcontracting of clearing work, reducing per-mile maintenance costs. Cyclical lineclearance also helps improve customer satisfaction. Customers are moreamenable to frequent cutting of small limbs and trees, and generally view this asacceptable. During the first cycle, however, customer satisfaction may beexpected to decrease as ROW is reclaimed. The incremental annual cost is $25.3million and the total annual cost for this program would be $36.19 million.Q. Has the Company utilized a partial clearing cycle in the past?A. Yes. Distribution line clearance has been funded to achieve established reliabilitytargets. This has resulted in the implementation of a partial clearing cycle.Transition to a full cycle clearing program has multiple benefits as described inthe previous response.Q. Is the Company proposing a change in accounting treatment?A. Yes. The cost to perform full cycle distribution line clearance is significantlygreater than the present spend. Additionally, costs for line clearance can varybased on market conditions and the expected volume of work per mile. TheCompany proposes that costs to achieve full cycle distribution line clearance bereconciled as part of the deferral recovery mechanism surcharge or surcreditmechanism that is discussed in detail by the Revenue Requirements Panel.55
Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYSEG)DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES,RELIABILITY, AND OPERATIONS PANEL123456789101112131415161718192021Transmission Right-of-Way MaintenanceQ. Can you explain the Company's current transmission line clearing program?A. The transmission line clearing program is set forth in the Company's Long-RangeRight-of-Way Management Plan (also referred to as the Transmission VegetationManagement Plan or "TVMP"). The TVMP is designed to meet mandatoryNERC standards (i.e., FAC-003) and the Commission's requirements establishedin Case 04-E-0822. We have determined that there is a need for approximately$400,000 in incremental annual transmission line clearing expenditures to ensurecompliance with the applicable standards and requirements.Incremental PositionsQ. Are incremental positions necessary to support reliable service?A. Additional positions are needed to maintain the electric system. The CommissionStaff recommended in the 2007 Electric Reliability Performance Report, datedSeptember 8, 2008, that NYSEG should conduct a detailed self-assessment of itsexisting crewing/field work personnel levels, crew locations, and the effect theselevels have on system reliability, particularly interruption duration. The reportalso noted that the assessment should include historical personnel levels and fieldwork locations broken down per operating division, along with the Company'sfuture plans. The report also noted that the assessment should identifyimprovements to ensure that an adequate workforce remains in place so thatreliability is maintained at pre-2007 levels.56
- Page 5 and 6: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 7 and 8: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 9 and 10: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 11 and 12: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 13 and 14: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 15 and 16: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 17 and 18: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 19 and 20: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 21 and 22: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 23 and 24: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 25 and 26: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 27 and 28: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 29 and 30: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 31 and 32: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 33 and 34: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 35 and 36: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 37 and 38: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 39 and 40: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 41 and 42: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 43 and 44: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 45 and 46: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 47 and 48: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 49 and 50: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 51 and 52: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 53 and 54: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 55: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 59 and 60: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 61 and 62: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 63 and 64: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 65 and 66: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 67 and 68: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 69 and 70: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 71 and 72: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 73 and 74: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 75 and 76: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 77 and 78: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 79 and 80: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 81 and 82: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 83 and 84: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 85 and 86: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 87 and 88: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 89 and 90: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 91 and 92: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
- Page 93 and 94: Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYS
Case 09-E-____; Case 09-G-____ (NYSEG)DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES,RELIABILITY, AND OPERATIONS PANEL123456789101112131415161718192021Transmission Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way MaintenanceQ. Can you explain <strong>the</strong> Company's current transmission line clearing program?A. The transmission line clearing program is set forth in <strong>the</strong> Company's Long-RangeRight-<strong>of</strong>-Way Management Plan (also referred to as <strong>the</strong> Transmission VegetationManagement Plan or "TVMP"). The TVMP is designed to meet m<strong>and</strong>atoryNERC st<strong>and</strong>ards (i.e., FAC-003) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commission's requirements establishedin Case 04-E-0822. We have determined that <strong>the</strong>re is a need for approximately$400,000 in incremental annual transmission line clearing <strong>expenditures</strong> to ensurecompliance with <strong>the</strong> applicable st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> requirements.Incremental PositionsQ. Are incremental positions necessary to support reliable service?A. Additional positions are needed to maintain <strong>the</strong> electric system. The CommissionStaff recommended in <strong>the</strong> 2007 Electric Reliability Performance Report, datedSeptember 8, 2008, that NYSEG should conduct a detailed self-assessment <strong>of</strong> itsexisting crewing/field work personnel levels, crew locations, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>the</strong>selevels have on system <strong>reliability</strong>, particularly interruption duration. The reportalso noted that <strong>the</strong> assessment should include historical personnel levels <strong>and</strong> fieldwork locations broken down per operating division, along with <strong>the</strong> Company'sfuture plans. The report also noted that <strong>the</strong> assessment should identifyimprovements to ensure that an adequate workforce remains in place so that<strong>reliability</strong> is maintained at pre-2007 levels.56