The sharp decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the size <strong>and</strong> abundance of <strong>Undaria</strong> plants at Westhaven Mar<strong>in</strong>a between October 2011 <strong>and</strong> January2012 can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 17.Figure 17: <strong>Undaria</strong> plants at Pier Z Westhaven Mar<strong>in</strong>a21/10/11 6/01/1122
5. Discussion5.1. <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>distribution</strong> of <strong>Undaria</strong> around the Corom<strong>and</strong>el Pen<strong>in</strong>sula<strong>Undaria</strong> is widespread on mussel farms around the Corom<strong>and</strong>el Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. It is well established on mussel farmstructures from Moturua Isl<strong>and</strong> (off the Papa Aroha coast) to Wilson Bay on the west coast of the Corom<strong>and</strong>el Pen<strong>in</strong>sula.Of the thirty one mussel farms surveyed, levels of <strong>Undaria</strong> <strong>in</strong>festation were def<strong>in</strong>ed as low to medium (1-100 plants per 50m transect) on seventeen of these mussel farms, high (>100 plants per 50 m transect) on eleven farms <strong>and</strong> <strong>Undaria</strong> wasnot seen on three of the farms <strong>in</strong>spected. The three mussel farms where <strong>Undaria</strong> was not recorded were at Kennedy Bay(two farms) <strong>and</strong> Port Charles (one farm). Small amounts of <strong>Undaria</strong> were found on an adjacent mussel farm at PortCharles <strong>and</strong> on a moor<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>e at Kennedy Bay which is an <strong>in</strong>dication that <strong>Undaria</strong> is likely to be present on the musselfarms dur<strong>in</strong>g peak grow<strong>in</strong>g season or when conditions are more favourable, such as when mussel l<strong>in</strong>es have been <strong>in</strong> thewater for longer. <strong>Undaria</strong> may have been present on l<strong>in</strong>es not <strong>in</strong>spected <strong>in</strong> this survey. <strong>Undaria</strong> is known to require highlight levels for successful growth <strong>and</strong> reproduction (Stuart, 2004). Hence <strong>Undaria</strong> was generally concentrated on the upper2 m of mussel l<strong>in</strong>es with densities decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rapidly at greater depths, consistent with Duder (2009) <strong>and</strong> Chen (2012).<strong>Undaria</strong> <strong>in</strong>festation levels tended to be higher on mussel l<strong>in</strong>es with mussels larger than 60mm present. Mussels of a sizeof ~60 mm will have been grow<strong>in</strong>g for 5-7 months, therefore giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Undaria</strong> this same amount of time to colonise the l<strong>in</strong>es.The high density <strong>Undaria</strong> populations found on the three mussel farms around Motukopake Isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> one off WhanganuiIsl<strong>and</strong> were on l<strong>in</strong>es with large mussels, 80-120mm. These farms were also <strong>in</strong>fested with the other <strong>in</strong>vasive species StyelaClava <strong>and</strong> Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides as well as native seaweeds (e.g., Ecklonia radiata, Sargassum ssp.) <strong>and</strong>other encrust<strong>in</strong>g organisms, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a low level of farm ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or clean<strong>in</strong>g at these sites. Clean<strong>in</strong>g of the floats<strong>and</strong> other <strong>in</strong>frastructure at small mussel farm<strong>in</strong>g sites does appear to reduce <strong>Undaria</strong> biomass on the farms. However,even well cleaned mussel farms were seen to have “hot spots” of <strong>Undaria</strong> <strong>in</strong>festation at the ends of l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> on warp l<strong>in</strong>eswhich are not pulled out of the water <strong>and</strong> cleaned as regularly as the rest of the floats <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es. These “hot spots” maythen act as reservoirs from which <strong>Undaria</strong> can spread back across mussel dropper l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> floats when they aredeployed at a site.The seven mussel farms surveyed with<strong>in</strong> the WBMFZ had <strong>Undaria</strong> present at more than 500 plants per 50m transect.These farms appeared well ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, with no “oversized” mussels <strong>and</strong> with low levels of other pest species present. Thevigour <strong>and</strong> density of the populations seen here, by far the largest aquaculture site surveyed, may be due to the fact thatthis is the most long established population of <strong>Undaria</strong>, it is where <strong>Undaria</strong> was first noted <strong>in</strong> the Corom<strong>and</strong>el region <strong>in</strong>1999 (Jessop, 2006). The size, ~1250ha, <strong>and</strong> nature of the WBMFZ likely ensures a constant <strong>and</strong> immense supply of<strong>Undaria</strong> spores at this site. This high propagule pressure is likely to perpetuate the dense population at this site despitediffer<strong>in</strong>g stages of mussel growth <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e/float rotation at <strong>in</strong>dividual farms with<strong>in</strong> the Zone. Further <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>toenvironmental <strong>in</strong>fluences could reveal other factors promot<strong>in</strong>g the growth <strong>and</strong> proliferation of <strong>Undaria</strong> at this site.Coastal survey results <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>Undaria</strong> has not extensively <strong>in</strong>vaded coastal sites adjacent to Corom<strong>and</strong>el musselfarm locations. <strong>Undaria</strong> was found at six out of the twenty six coastal sites surveyed. In general, numbers found at thecoastal sites were relatively low compared to densities found on the farms, total numbers seen at <strong>in</strong>dividual coastal siteswere between one <strong>and</strong> fifty plants. At this stage it is unknown whether the low densities are a result of recent colonisation<strong>and</strong> therefore <strong>in</strong>sufficient time for establishment of large populations, whether other mechanisms may prevent theestablishment of large populations at these coastal sites, or if the tim<strong>in</strong>g of some surveys may have co<strong>in</strong>cided with lowdensities of plants. <strong>Undaria</strong> was found <strong>in</strong> shallow reef habitats with easily colonisable open spaces. It was not found to bepresent at comparable sites with dense macroalgal canopies. Plants were seen to be colonis<strong>in</strong>g areas of small to mediumboulders or patches of clear rocky reef <strong>in</strong>side the subtidal algal belt or adjacent to it at the low-<strong>in</strong>tertidal or reef-s<strong>and</strong>border.Coastal sites adjacent to mussel farms potentially present less favourable conditions for the colonisation of <strong>Undaria</strong> thanthe mussel farms themselves. The abundance of <strong>Undaria</strong> on float<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> suspended structures may be l<strong>in</strong>ked to thereduction <strong>in</strong> graz<strong>in</strong>g pressure which occurs on these surfaces as opposed to coastal sites (Castric-Fey et al, 1993; Floc’het al, 1998; S<strong>in</strong>ner et al, 2000). Relatively low densities at coastal sites could reflect poor dispersal to these locations or23