12.07.2015 Views

something to smile about? - Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC

something to smile about? - Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC

something to smile about? - Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MANAGING RISKFX FORECASTER OF THE YEARHow accurate areFX forecasts?Every month financial institutions across the UK provide CFwith their FX and interest-rate predictions. But how accurateare they? Jason Eden analyses the submissions for 2003 andreveals who is CF’s FX Forecaster of the Year.METHODOLOGYThe methodology consists as follows:Each month the participants forecastwhere the spot rate will be in 3 monthstime. We have taken the mid-month spotrate for each applicable month andawarded the 10 nearest forecasters pointsstarting from 10 for a first place, down <strong>to</strong>one for 10th place. CF chose <strong>to</strong> rankforecasters by <strong>to</strong>tal points, not averagepoints, hence rewarding those who havebeen most diligent in providing forecastseach month.The past 12 months haven’tbeen easy for FX forecasters.The war in Iraq, SARSand only a fledglingrecovery of the world’seconomies have kept many of them ontheir <strong>to</strong>es.But, judging by the results of theanalysis of FX forecasts published in CFduring 2003, some of the forecasters outthere have done a damn good job,despite these difficulties. (Some, <strong>to</strong> befair, have done a pretty poor job, butwe’ll leave you <strong>to</strong> work out who has eggover their face).So, the results are in and for the firsttime in four years, CF is pleased <strong>to</strong>announce a new titleholder of its FXForecaster of the year trophy. Or, <strong>to</strong> bemore precise, two new titleholders.Royal Bank of Scotland’s (RBoS) forecastingduo Neil Parker, marketingstrategist for G7 countries, and AdrianSchmidt, senior currency strategist,have <strong>to</strong>ppled Societe Generale’s BobEveling from the <strong>to</strong>p spot he has heldfor the past three years.“We are very pleased <strong>to</strong> be numberone. We believe it is due, in part, <strong>to</strong> theclose working relationship that Adrianand me have at RBoS,” says Parker. AndRBoS deserves its place at the <strong>to</strong>p of theleague table. Not only was it the overallwinner, but it placed first in cable and €-JPY – two currency pairs that saw someserious volatility during 2003 - and finishedin the <strong>to</strong>p five of all the currencypairs we categorised in our leaguetables. “RBoS would expect <strong>to</strong> do verywell in cable, as it is our home market.We feel confident in predicting whatdrives this currency pair,” says Schmidt.A volatile market - maybeDepending on which forecaster youtalk <strong>to</strong>, 2003 was either a very volatileyear or pretty flat. Such varying viewsmay explain the array of forecasts CFreceives every month.“Volumes were massive in 2003,”says Trevor Williams, chief economist,financial market division at Lloyds TSB,“largely due <strong>to</strong> the volatility.” AndWilliams predicts 2004 <strong>to</strong> be as interesting,and busy, a year. “Theglobalisation of the world economymeans an increase in trade, and withChina and Russia joining in, capitalOVERALL BEST FXFORECASTER BANKTotal Frequency AveragePointspointsRBoS 236 36 5.88Lloyds 228 37 6.16Societe Generale 222 42 5.42SEB 203 28 7.25Commerzbank 201 37 5.43UBS 184 33 6.90Citigroup 181 28 6.46AMEX 168 23 7.30CSFB 137 24 5.71markets expanding and volatility rising.”Parker agrees: “The volatility isself-evident by the see-sawing we’veseen in the currency markets and thescale and speed of the moves during2003. Moving forward, we’d expectvolatility <strong>to</strong> be high this year as well,although perhaps slightly lower thanlast year. Moves will remain abrupt andlarge by recent his<strong>to</strong>rical standards.”Bob Eveling, senior vice president,FX and derivative sales at SocieteGenerale, disagrees with both Parkerand Williams: “Volatility levels becamerelatively flat as it became obvious theUSD was a one-way bet, i.e. it would godown. Apart from brief flurries onprofit-taking driven orders in general,volatility was quiet.”USD weakeningFor most analysts, developing a weakeningdollar strategy was the key <strong>to</strong> asuccessful 2003. Parker, for example,30 cf March 2004 corporatefinancemag.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!