Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

watershed.watch.org
from watershed.watch.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

sockeye stocks tended to coincide with periods of high productivity in western Alaskanstocks, and vice versa.The Cohen Commission is interested in factors affecting the Fraser sockeye fishery, not onlyFraser sockeye productivity. Over the last two decades there has been an increasing amount ofen-route mortality of returning Fraser sockeye spawners (i.e., mortality between the Missionenumeration site and the spawning ground), as illustrated for late run sockeye in Figure 4.1-5.This results in reduced harvest, as fishery managers do their best to ensure enough spawnersreturn to the spawning ground in spite of considerable mortality along the way. Since en-routemortality is already included in estimates of recruits, it does not affect estimates of productivity,but it does affect the fishery.Other patterns noted by McKinnell et al. (2011) have particular relevance to the low 2009 returns(2007 ocean entry for most sockeye), and provide some interesting contrasts among stocks withdifferent life history patterns and migratory pathways:o most Fraser River sockeye stocks had very poor returns/spawner in 2009, but;o Columbia River sockeye had double their average returns in 2009 (recruits/spawner notavailable),o hatchery-reared sockeye from Cultus Lake showed typical survival rates through theStrait of Georgia in 2007 (estimated from tracking acoustic tags), ando there were record high returns of Harrison River sockeye in 2010, from underyearlingsthat reared in the Strait of Georgia in 2007.32

Figure 4.1-3. Estimates of long term trends in total life cycle productivity for the four Fraser sockeye run timinggroups, by brood year. The graph is based on productivity estimates for each stock, using a smoothedKalman filter, using the stock-recruitment model that best fit the data (methods explained in Peterman andDorner 2011). Brood year is year of spawning. The productivity estimates are in the same units for allstocks, plotted relative to each stock’s mean and standard deviation. Four stocks show no trend in thissmoothed Kalman filter indicator (i.e., Raft, Scotch, Portage, Weaver). This may be due to the absence ofany long term trend, a masking of the underlying trend by high year to year variability, and/or gaps in thetime series. Annual residuals in productivity for these four stocks have however been well below their longterm means in several brood years since 2000. Source: Peterman and Dorner (2011)33

<strong>sockeye</strong> stocks tended to coincide with periods of high productivity in western Alaskanstocks, <strong>and</strong> vice versa.The Cohen Commission is interested in factors affecting the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> fishery, not only<strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> productivity. Over the last two decades there has been an increasing amount ofen-route mortality of returning <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> spawners (i.e., mortality between the Missionenumeration site <strong>and</strong> the spawning ground), as illustrated for late run <strong>sockeye</strong> in Figure 4.1-5.This results in reduced harvest, as fishery managers do their best to ensure enough spawnersreturn to the spawning ground in spite of considerable mortality along the way. Since en-routemortality is already included in estimates of recruits, it does not affect estimates of productivity,but it does affect the fishery.Other patterns noted by McKinnell et al. (2011) have particular relevance to the low 2009 returns(2007 ocean entry for most <strong>sockeye</strong>), <strong>and</strong> provide some interesting contrasts among stocks withdifferent life history patterns <strong>and</strong> migratory pathways:o most <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> stocks had very poor returns/spawner in 2009, but;o Columbia <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> had double their average returns in 2009 (recruits/spawner notavailable),o hatchery-reared <strong>sockeye</strong> from Cultus Lake showed typical survival rates through theStrait of Georgia in 2007 (estimated from tracking acoustic tags), <strong>and</strong>o there were record high returns of Harrison <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> in 2010, from underyearlingsthat reared in the Strait of Georgia in 2007.32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!