12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transmit HIV. Providing male circumcision only to HIV-negative men may discourage allmen from accessing male circumcision <strong>and</strong> women may falsely conclude that if a man iscircumcised, there is no risk of HIV acquisition.Gap noted, <strong>for</strong> example, in Ug<strong>and</strong>a (Wawer et al., 2009); Southern Africa (Anderssonet al., 2009); sub-Saharan Africa (Hallett et al., 2008a); Kenya (Agot et al., 2007); SouthAfrica (Taljaard et al., 2008); Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Zimbabwe (Matovu et al., 2007).3D. Prevention <strong>for</strong> <strong>Women</strong>: Treating SexuallyTransmitted Infections (STIs)Worldwide, the burden of sexually transmitted infections in women is more than five timesthat in men (Sciarra, 2009). The prevention <strong>and</strong> treatment of the other sexually transmittedinfections may also play a role in HIV prevention <strong>for</strong> women.Multiple observational studies have found an association between STIs <strong>and</strong> HIV (Cohen,2009). Modeling exercises suggest that increases in the HIV viral burden in the genital tractcan increase the efficiency of HIV transmission. STIs generally increase the concentration ofHIV-1 in the genital tract. Thus, treating STIs in HIV-infected men was suggested as a wayto reduce transmission to women. In addition, treating STIs in HIV-uninfected women washoped to decrease their susceptibility to acquiring HIV.However, the evidence that treating STIs can reduce the spread of HIV to women has beengenerally disappointing (Padian, 2010; Celum et al., 2010). A Cochrane review from 2004noted: “There is limited evidence from r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trials <strong>for</strong> STI control as an effectiveHIV prevention strategy” (Sangani et al., 2004). The only study to have shown an impacton HIV incidence from STI treatment has been the Mwanza trial in Tanzania. A combinationof improved STI treatment services was shown to reduce HIV incidence in an environmentcharacterized by an emerging HIV epidemic (low <strong>and</strong> slowly rising prevalence), where STItreatment services are poor, <strong>and</strong> where STIs are highly prevalent (Grosskurth et al., 1995). Theother eight trials of STI treatment have shown no effect on HIV acquisition (Padian, 2010).However, using STI services as a point of access to reach women at high risk of acquiringHIV is important. These services “contribute to the achievement of universal access to HIVprevention by promoting condom use, behavioral change <strong>and</strong> the empowerment of vulnerablepopulations” (Chersich <strong>and</strong> Rees, 2008: S35). “Even if in the end it is found that STDs haveonly a limited impact on HIV transmission, we cannot af<strong>for</strong>d to miss the potentially costeffectivechance of controlling HIV through their treatment. Additionally, STDs are importantdiseases, which by themselves cause major morbidity <strong>and</strong> reduced fertility, dem<strong>and</strong>ingcontrol” (Rottingen et al., 2001: 594).[See also Chapter 8. Meeting the Sexual <strong>and</strong> Reproductive Health Needs of <strong>Women</strong> Living WithHIV <strong>for</strong> additional sexual <strong>and</strong> reproductive health interventions]70 CHAPTER 3 PREVENTION FOR WOMEN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!