12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Promising Strategies:5. Integrating ARV therapy into antenatal care, rather than referring women separately <strong>for</strong>HIV treatment, may reduce time to treatment initiation <strong>for</strong> pregnant women living withHIV. [See also Chapter 13. Structuring Health Services to Meet <strong>Women</strong>’s Needs]An evaluation in Zambia that compared integration of antiretroviral therapy in antenatalcare to referral to ART care found that where antiretroviral therapy was integrated withantenatal care, women were more than twice as likely to be enrolled while pregnant <strong>and</strong>within 60 days of HIV diagnosis <strong>and</strong> to have initiated ART while pregnant. Between2007 <strong>and</strong> 2008, 13,917 women started antenatal care more than 60 days be<strong>for</strong>e theintervention rollout <strong>and</strong> constituted the control cohort; 17,619 women started antenatalcare after ART was integrated into ANC <strong>and</strong> constituted the intervention cohort. Ofthe 1,566 patients found eligible <strong>for</strong> ART, 376 out of 846 (44.4%) enrolled while pregnant<strong>and</strong> within 60 days of HIV diagnosis as compared with 181 of 716 (25.3%) whowere referred <strong>for</strong> ART. 278 out of 846 (32.9%) of women who accessed ART in integratedservices in ANC initiated ART while pregnant compared to 103 of 716 (14.4%) ofthose who were referred <strong>for</strong> ART. <strong>Women</strong> found to be HIV-positive through antenataltesting had a specimen routinely sent <strong>for</strong> a CD4 cell count. Separate ART facilities werelocated on the same premises but physically separate <strong>and</strong> separately staffed (Killam etal., 2009). (Gray III) (treatment, PMTCT, antenatal care, Zambia)A study of 872 women in Zambia found that HAART was less effective among womenwho had been exposed to single dose nevirapine. HIV-positive women who had receivedsingle dose nevirapine between 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2005 who could be contacted were evaluated<strong>for</strong> eligibility <strong>for</strong> HAART if they had CD4 counts under 200 or viral counts under35 <strong>and</strong> evidence of WHO clinical disease stage 3” (Kuhn et al., 2009b). . Mortality inwomen who met ART eligibility criteria was high with 23.7% mortality by 24 monthsin the era be<strong>for</strong>e ART became available. Of 161 single dose nevirapine exposed womenwho were still on HAART after six months, 70.8% achieved a viral load less than 400copies per milliliter <strong>and</strong> 40.4% achieved a viral load less than 50 copies per milliliter. Ofeight women exposed to single dose nevirapine within six months of starting HAART,only three achieved a viral load of less than 400 copies per milliliter by six monthsafter therapy compared with 59.1% of 22 women who started HAART within six to 12months after single dose nevirapine <strong>and</strong>, 72.1% of 61 who started HAART within 12 to24 months, <strong>and</strong> 77.1% of 70 who started more than 24 months after exposure. “WithHIV treatment programs now in place, women should be screened <strong>for</strong> ART during pregnancy”(Kuhn et al., 2009b: 135). “If ART is available, pregnant women should be prioritized<strong>and</strong> started on therapy if eligible as a matter of urgency… These results emphasizethe importance of establishing appropriate referrals <strong>and</strong> coordination between servicesso that pregnant HIV-infected women can be triaged <strong>for</strong> ART if appropriate” (Kuhn etal., 2009b: 136). (Gray III) (HAART, PMTCT, Zambia)WHAT WORKS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!