12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>for</strong> infectivity) were inconsistent (Curtis et al., 2009). (Gray III) (contraception, familyplanning)A multi-country cohort analysis comparing the incidence of HIV disease progressionamong anti-retroviral therapy-naïve women with <strong>and</strong> without exposure to hormonalcontraception at 13 sites in Africa <strong>and</strong> Asia found no association between hormonalcontraceptive use <strong>and</strong> HIV disease progression. Between August 2002 <strong>and</strong> December2007, the MTCT-Plus programs enrolled 7846 women. 4109 (52%) women met theeligibility criteria <strong>for</strong> this analysis <strong>and</strong> contributed 5911 person-years of follow-up. Atbaseline, 3064 (75%) women reported using either no contraception or a nonhormonalmethod, whereas 823 (20%) reported using implants/injectables <strong>and</strong> 222 (5%) reportedusing oral contraceptive pills. The disease progression outcome was met by 944 (29%)women. Neither implants/injectables nor oral contraceptive pills were associated withdisease progression (Stringer et al., 2009). (Gray III) (contraception, family planning,PMTCT)A study of 4,200 HIV-negative women in South Africa ages 35 to 49 years of age foundthat during 5,010 person years of follow-up, 111 women acquired HIV. Of the 4,200women, 21% used hormonal contraception, of which 14% used DMPA <strong>and</strong> 5% norethindroneenanthate. After adjusting <strong>for</strong> sexual risk behaviors <strong>and</strong> STIs, the incidenceof HIV was similar among women using combined oral contraceptives, DMPA <strong>and</strong>norethindrone enanthate compared to women not using any hormonal contraceptives.“The conflicting evidence regarding the potential role of hormonal contraception inincreasing women’s risk of HIV infection would appear to dem<strong>and</strong> further epidemiologicalinvestigation. However, any true association is likely to be small…In the caseof hormonal contraception <strong>and</strong> HIV infection, it is unclear whether more definitiveevidence is likely to emerge from observational epidemiological studies…” (Myer et al.,2007b: 173.). (Gray III) (contraception, DMPA, South Africa)A study with 13 years of follow-up in Ug<strong>and</strong>a which assessed the association betweenhormonal contraceptive use on time from HIV seroconversion to death from 1994 to2006 with 625 women found that hormonal contraception was not associated with anincreased risk of death in HIV-positive women <strong>and</strong> “thus does not support the concernthat hormonal contraception accelerates time-to-death among HIV-infected women”(Polis et al., 2009). (Gray III) (contraception, Ug<strong>and</strong>a)An observational prospective cohort study of 498 HIV-positive women in Kenya <strong>and</strong>Zimbabwe with CD4 counts equal to or greater than 500 who used a contraceptivemethod of their choice <strong>and</strong> were followed up every six months <strong>for</strong> four years was notassociated with HIV disease progression. Of the 363 women who used their contraceptivemethod consistently <strong>for</strong> a mean of two years, 135 (37%) used DMPA; 85 (23%) usedoral contraceptives <strong>and</strong> 143 (39%) used non-hormonal methods. DMPA users <strong>and</strong> oralcontraceptive users had a similar change in CD4 count in comparison to women usingnon-hormonal contraception methods; change in HIV viral load was not significantlyWHAT WORKS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!