12.07.2015 Views

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

What Works for Women and Girls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Geneva, Switzerl<strong>and</strong> (November 2–4, 2009), noted that “In 2007 alone, there were 2.7 millionnew HIV infections. By the end of 2008, more than 4 million people were accessing antiretroviraltherapy in low- <strong>and</strong> middle-income countries. That same year, an estimated 5.5 million inimmediate need of treatment could not access it. Current ef<strong>for</strong>ts to treat HIV are not keepingpace with all those who need therapy. Without a dramatic reduction in new HIV infections,this trend will continue (WHO, 2009j).<strong>What</strong> <strong>Works</strong>—Treatment: Provision <strong>and</strong> Access1. Antiretroviral therapy has been successfully administered to both men <strong>and</strong> womenwith good adherence, good patient retention, <strong>and</strong> good clinical outcomes in resourcepoorsettings; results have been similar to those achieved in resource-rich countries.EVIDENCE1. Antiretroviral therapy has been successfully administered to both men <strong>and</strong> women withgood adherence, good patient retention, <strong>and</strong> good clinical outcomes in resource-poorsettings; results have been similar to those achieved in resource-rich countries.A systematic comparison of antiretroviral therapy on mortality of HIV-positive patients inboth low-income <strong>and</strong> high-income countries found that antiretroviral therapy is feasible<strong>and</strong> effective in low-income settings. Mortality was higher in the first few months oftreatment <strong>for</strong> patients in low-income settings. Those in low-income settings startedtreatment with considerably more advanced immunodeficiency than those from industrializedcountries, but virological <strong>and</strong> immunological response to HAART were similarin both settings. The study compared 4,810 treatment-naïve adult patients (51% female)from 18 HAART programs in Africa, Asia <strong>and</strong> South America (low-income settings)with 22,217 treatment-naïve adults (25% female) in 12 HIV cohort studies from Europe<strong>and</strong> North America (high-income settings) <strong>and</strong> compared baseline characteristics <strong>and</strong>outcomes during the first year of HAART (ART-LINC & ART-CC, 2006). (Gray III)(treatment, HAART, Africa, Asia, South America, Europe, North America)A review of nine articles <strong>and</strong> 18 abstracts until 2006 from sub-Saharan Africa, with12,116 patients found favorable levels of adherence, with 77% of patients achieving 95%adherence according to patient self-reports. Adherence from studies in sub-SaharanAfrica showed that that more patients were adherent than patients in North America,based on 31 studies with 17,537 patients (Mills et al., 2006). (Gray IV) (adherence, treatment,sub-Saharan Africa, North America)172 CHAPTER 7 TREATMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!